Unsightly Mental Blemishes

From the European Southern Observatory:

First ever image of a multi-planet system around a Sun-like star.

First ever image of a multi-planet system around a Sun-like star (uncropped, with annotations)

I’ve never seen so much unintended height differential between characters!

Manhandled (1949) is a mediocre whodunit that does a credible job on the front end and then wastes it on the back end. Author and cash-strapped husband Alton has been bothered for weeks with a dream that he’s beating his wife, a rich socialite, to death with a bottle of perfume. He takes his problem to a psychiatrist, who urgently contacts the wife for an interview. She shows up in the company of an architect, who is designing a beach house for her; she has little time for the absurd dream.

But the psychiatrist’s assistant has a rather loose, flappy mouth, telling her wannabe boyfriend, a former police officer who was removed from the force and is now a private detective, about this unusual case, and mentioning the expensive diamonds the woman wore to the appointment. This smarmy ex-cop takes advantage of her to snatch her keys to the office and make a copy of them.

The next morning, the wife is dead, bludgeoned to death in her apartment with, yes, a bottle of expensive perfume. And the ex-cop is fencing her jewels.

Who did it? Unfortunately, people are exonerated far too easily. The husband, a dislikable character, took sleeping pills and couldn’t have done it; the maid and butler confirm that and have their own alibis; the architect, who is honestly a nobody, is also quickly proven to be elsewhere.

Which leaves the assistant and the ex-cop.

There’s a lot missing here. Some characters seem to exist without histories or futures. The husband might be an author, but will he ever publish another book? And why the dream? The architect, who seems unaffected by the murder? The insurance agent, who pops up out of nowhere and gets in the police’s way? The police? The ex-cop?

The psychiatrist?

The mysteries are somewhat fun to figure out, but there’s a lack of connection to the characters that keep this movie on the B-list. It’s not awful, and when one of the characters is purposefully crushed by a car against a wall in a back alley, it’s almost surreal. Some of it is clever, but in the end, it just doesn’t click.

A nature show with a drunk narrator.

I’ve been suggesting for years that the Republican Party, because of the use of the internal RINO! (Republican In Name Only, as in cries of) tactic to drive out members who are moderate or stand in the way of the ambitious, will eventually lose enough members that the party will become irrelevant, even extinct. It’s like a cancer, cancerous cells killing off healthy cells through deprivation of resources, all in their frantic race to survive forever. Thus, as the host dies, ends the cancer, and so, too, with the Republicans.

And, perhaps, some Republicans are beginning to realize it.

… some Republicans are privately fretting about their own lot, worried that the extremes of their party will drive them into extinction.

“I hope these trends reverse, but I don’t see them reversing without very principled and strong leadership emerging from those who have the responsibility to step forward and say enough is enough,” said former congressman Charles W. Boustany Jr. (R-La.), who said his onetime colleagues appear to be “cowed into silence” instead of pushing back on the direction the party is going.

Admittedly, the provenance of the plural pronoun is somewhat ambiguous, but whether it points at the GOP composite entity, or the “moderate” Republicans, many of whom were the far-right radicals just a few short years ago, it’s much the same thing: a death sentence, not yet executed but direly threatening the inhabitants of the famed epistemic bubble, a bubble which cuts them off from communications and judgments from the outside world. That glass wall, so easily pierced, keeps them from realizing how perverse they’ve become – and how this appears to be ending for them over the next few years.

Republicans, however, aren’t technically moving right as much as they are becoming more Trump-like and embracing controversial positions. This summer, each primary appeared to be a race to convince voters who was closer to Trump, who supported him first or who loves him most.

Whether or not they had reasoned positions, first comes their allegiance to Trump and the bubble. Outside is chaos, inside is order. Trump and his incompetence, his barstool blowhard-ism, is the clarion call for those whose views on important issues are often incoherent, and cannot understand why they’ve not been accorded respect and power before now.

Well, reality has already slapped them across the face, once, but not as hard as I’d think 180,000+ dead would be. We’ve seen certain senior Republicans advance the view that the pandemic toll is really only 9,000, the number of death certificates that list Covid-19 as the sole cause of death. It’s trivial enough to refute: a “co-morbidity” such as diabetes does not consign them to a short lifetime. I have a friend who’s been diabetic for 40+ years. But if he caught Covid-19, he might be dead within a week.

Those Republicans should resign in embarrassment.

But that’s how they try to avoid the reality that they are unequal to the task of government: confusion, mendacity, distraction. Welcome to the bubble.

Vote Biden, and vote early.

When the ornamental grass is getting hairy.

Soon to be flattened by … snow.

Some random shots over the last couple of weeks.

Best I could do with a smartphone.

Here’s an orb weaver that I surprised at the back faucet.

I don’t think he’s smiling.

I rather like this bee supping on our garlic chives. Came out well.

Emily Atkin of Heated notes how the real danger missed by all of us drama addicts in the wake of Hurricane Laura:

People in Southwest Louisiana are suffering in the wake of Hurricane Laura, the strongest storm to ever hit the state, and the fifth-strongest storm to ever hit the country.

Though not as catastrophic as expected, the Category 4 storm killed at least 16 people, and insured losses are estimated to be between $8 billion and $12 billion. That’s staggering considering Laura’s path avoided major population centers like New Orleans and Houston. …

Living in a city with these conditions would be dangerous on its own, particularly for poor, elderly, or sick populations. But Southwest Louisiana residents have also had another dangerous condition to deal with since the storm passed: relentless extreme heat. Since Hurricane Laura hit, a relentless heat wave has been choking the region. That extreme and potentially deadly heat continues today [August 31], according to the National Weather Service.

It’s not hyberbole to call this deadly. More Americans die each year from the effects of heat and heat-related illness than any other form of severe weather, according to the National Weather Service. The heat index in Laura-plagued regions could reach up to 112 degrees Fahrenheit on Monday, the NWS’s advisory said. It added: “Hot temperatures and high humidity may cause heat illnesses, especially where power outages have occurred.”

How to highlight heatwaves? Up here in Minnesota, anything over 90° gets the the local meteorologists barking, acting as if we’re a bunch of wilting dandelions, and that can be true when we also get hit by a wave of moisture, such as, say, from a Gulf of Mexico hurricane. This summer we’ve seen a number of days with abnormally high dewpoints, days that reminded me of childhood visits to Gulfport, Mississippi.

But Atkins is also reporting on a proposal to name heatwaves. No doubt a lot of people will be skeptical, right up until they discover that a lot of people are talking about how they lost their parents to Heatwave Doug. Names will function as a marker and a warning to those in affected areas – and reminders that heat is a result of anthropogenic climate change.

So, add together the wreckage in the trail of the Iowa derecho, and the wildfires in California, and right now we seem to be silently reeling.

In case you’ve recently heard of the South Atlantic Anomaly, and was wondering if it’s a precursor to the rumored flip of the Earth’s magnetic poles, well, sorry to  disappoint your inner drama queen, but probably not:

“Our study provides the first long term analysis of the magnetic field in this region dating back millions of years,” Yael Engbers, lead author of the study, said in a statement. “It reveals that the anomaly in the magnetic field in the South Atlantic is not a one-off, similar anomalies existed eight to 11 million years ago.”

Researchers studied rocks from 34 volcanic eruptions that occurred at Saint Helena between 8 and 11 million years ago. When volcanic rocks cool down, small grains of iron-oxide in them get magnetized, preserving the direction and strength of the Earth’s magnetic field at that time and place.

Earth’s magnetic field lines run from south to north. The geomagnetic records from the rocks show that the magnetic field at Saint Helena has pointed in different directions during past eruptions. This suggests that the magnetic field in this region has been unstable for millions of years.

Earth’s magnetic field changes in strength and direction over time. It is believed that these fluctuations may eventually trigger a reversal of the Earth’s magnetic field. However, given that the magnetic field at the region of the South Atlantic Anomaly has been unstable for several million years, it is not likely associated with any such impending reversal, according to the statement. [Space.com]

Yeah, I had my hopes up, too, but it appears that this is not the big signal we were hoping for.

Oh, you weren’t hoping for it? Terribly sorry. I hope I haven’t upset you.

Much.

(I should write a Fringe Play some day, just to get all this smart-alecky dialogue out of my head. See, my drain-plug is stuck and it’s building up over time … or was it space … or maybe Kentucky …)

From NewScientist (18 July 2020, but recently received):

Making an artificial intelligence less biased makes it less accurate, according to conventional wisdom, but that may not be true. A new way of testing AIs could help us build algorithms that are both fairer and more effective.

Excuse me, but isn’t bias a cause of inaccuracy?

Years and years ago, when I first heard about Kaggle, a then-independent web site for developing data science / machine learning skills, I enjoyed messing about. Without formal training or the free time to work on algorithms, I never did much more than play with their Titanic survivor challenge, but it was fun.

Nowadays, I get mail like this:

The Connectivity Map, a project within the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, together with the Laboratory for Innovation Science at Harvard (LISH) brings this challenge to you with the goal to improve existing algorithms for drug development by looking at a cell’s Mechanism of Action (MoA).

In this competition, you will have access to a unique dataset that combines gene expression and cell viability data. The data is based on a new technology that measures human cells’ responses to drugs in a pool of 100 different cell types. If successful, you’ll develop an algorithm to predict a compound’s MoA given its cellular signature; thus helping scientists advance the drug discovery process.

Prizes
$30,000 – Total prize pool

Maybe I’m profoundly ignorant, but, quite honestly, improving or replacing those algorithms could lead to millions or even billions of dollars in profits, years down the road.

And a $30,000 prize pool seems cheap in comparison.

I think it’d be far more fair if Kaggle, or the sponsors of the competition, guaranteed the winners a part of the action. Probably some percentage of revenue generated by their work, if that’s measurable.

Although, honestly, it also sounds like a wellspring of lawsuits.

But the entire competition, as it sits now, feels like a scam.

For those following the side show, Kanye West’s Presidential Campaign has suffered two legal reversals, in Virginia and Arizona, but for differing reasons. First, Virginia:

A Circuit Court judge ordered state officials to remove independent presidential candidate Kanye West from the Virginia ballot Thursday, granting an emergency order sought by two voters who said they were duped into helping the rapper-entrepreneur qualify for the ballot.

Circuit Court Judge Joi Jeter Taylor made the ruling in a lawsuit filed this week by Matthan Wilson and Bryan Wright, who sued state elections officials for putting West on the ballot but faced their only opposition from West, whose attorney petitioned to intervene in the case. [WaPo]

In other words, West supporters cheated in order to get the required signatures. A bit mundane, compared to Arizona:

West has already qualified to appear on the ballot in several states, including Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Tennessee and Utah. He didn’t qualify in Ohio, Montana, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin and other states, though he has filed lawsuits challenging some of those decisions.

Earlier this week, Arizona resident Rasean Clayton filed a lawsuit for West to be barred from appearing on the ballot. The lawsuit accused the rapper of serving as an election spoiler and argued that state law barred him from running as an independent candidate because West is a registered Republican. …

Despite those claims, Clayton’s attorneys said West remains a registered Republican. They also said nearly all of West’s electors — who would cast electoral college votes if he were to win — were Republicans until they changed registrations to independent on Monday and Tuesday. [azcentral]

Not only dishonesty, but an interesting accusation of being an election spoiler. This is a legal thing? No statute is cited, of course. On the other hand, having two Republicans running for President on the same ballot does sound dubious.

Especially if they were both marked as Republicans.

I keep wondering if the Republican Trump cult strategists understand the hand grenade they’re playing with here, giving moderate Republicans an alternative to voting for Trump. Sure, I know it’s all a fantasy for little old me^[1] to think I know better than professional, if incompetent, strategists, but I can’t help but put myself into a moderate Republican’s shoes, envision the ballot in front of me – and mark it for West rather than Trump.

Or perhaps that’s the entire point to the exercise. Anyone check for links from Kanye West to The Lincoln Project?

¹ OK, so I’m 6′ 3″ and 230 pounds. Work with me here!

Company of the Day: Troubled clothing store Old Navy:

On Tuesday, Old Navy announced it will pay its store employees to work the polls on Election Day. The company, which has 50,000-plus employees, said it is working with Civic Alliance, a nonpartisan coalition of businesses, and Power the Polls, an organization aimed at recruiting 250,000 poll workers “to ensure polling sites stay open and operate efficiently across the country” on Election Day. [Business Insider]

They are not unique, as other companies such as Tory Burch are also paying their employees to work at the polls. However, it’s worth noting for two reasons:

1. Old Navy, in particular, has been in trouble for a few years, so this can be considered to be a promotional move on their part.
2. But, since Republican Party fortunes are generally considered to be in an inverse relationship to the number of votes cast, this can also be considered a repudiation of President Trump and, generally, Republican policies. Without access to the boardrooms of these companies, it’s hard to say exactly what upsets the directors and executives of these companies, but candidates include the incompetency exhibited by the Republican, specific policies, such as deregulation, a general dismay at the business atmosphere engendered by Republican leadership, or even the mercantilistic preferences that have appeared from time to time.

We’ve seen other rebuffs of the Republicans, as a number of spacious sports venues have been made available as polling locations, particularly in states where vote by mail may be suspect. While those moves have, in part, been prompted by their employees that are their lifeblood, i.e., the players, in the Old Navy case the employees don’t have that kind of leverage.

Which makes this more impressive.

I’ve been thinking we’re seeing the disintegrative phase of the American Empire, as President Trump’s clash with the Democrats and, in actual deed, reality, appears to align with Professor’s observation that the disintegrative phase of historical empires includes internecine warfare in the ruling class. Perhaps the corporate world has recognized that leadership by a group determined to hold onto power, as evidenced by rampant gerrymandering, voter suppression, and Trump’s own conflict with reality^[1], will not lead to continued prosperity, but into an uncertain future inherent in having third-raters leading government.

And, by moves such as these, we can evade, or at least delay, that expected internecine warfare. I suppose it’ll depend on how the great American Political Middle responds to extremists on both ends of the spectrum. My ideal ending? A whole lot of white supremacists, boogaloo boys, and allied groups stripped of their weapons and sitting in jail, and, for the extremist left, those who are violent – not many, but there will be a few – jailed, while the intellectual extreme left defanged through debate and fortitude by the liberals and rational conservatives.

Gotta love my fantasies. Why have bad ones?

¹ If I have to give examples of any of this, my reader needs to get caught up on the news on their own time.

Republican strategist Michael Steel doesn’t get it:

This is clearly not the campaign the president wanted to run. Trump’s initial strategy, before the pandemic set in, was clear. Look at his 2020 Super Bowl ad, which seems like a quaint relic from a bygone age. Titled, “Stronger, Safer, More Prosperous,” it lays out the administration’s then-impressive economic record (‘best wage growth in a decade’ ‘sinking unemployment’).

When the president followed good conservative public policy (like tax reform and cutting red tape), the results were excellent. It’s also worth looking back at the ad his team ran during the World Series last fall, which said, “He’s no Mr. Nice Guy, but sometimes it takes a Donald Trump to change Washington.” [The Dispatch]

“If it wasn’t for Covid-19” is the message behind Steele’s post, “then Republican religious tenets would have won the day!”

But it’s simply not true. 20,000 lies would remain to be explained away, and for the stickler who notes that some of those lies are connected to Covid-19 and thus should be excluded, the first 18,000 more or less guarantee that even without Covid-19, the lies would have kept coming. He is what he is.

Their adherence to the Laffer Curve, a primary religious tenet, was proven to be unwise by the mountainous deficits run by the Federal government after the 2017 tax reforms were passed into law.

Source: St. Louis Fed

This long time strategist, who may be seen as instrumental in building a culture which permits a Donald Trump to become President, clearly doesn’t understand that in order to avoid a repeat of the current four-year fiasco, it’s necessary to understand that the entire party, including himself, must take the blame and investigate how to adjust to become, once again, a responsible governance party – and not a party that merely seeks to win and reap the treasure that supposedly comes with it.

We have to get off this film, I tell you!

Sound Of Horror (1966) is the story of a team of European treasure hunters, in the mountains of Greece, who believe they’ve found the location of a buried treasure. And all that stands between them and it is a buried concrete barrier. A little dynamite will take care of that, right?

And a really irritable, screaming dinosaur. Which was apparently only able to shuffle about like it’s lame.

And just to compound the fun, not to mention keep the budget low, the dinosaur is … wait for it … invisible.

Don’t blink! It’s the producer!

Yeah, nothing can save this bad boy. Earnest acting, occasional glimpses of the monster, footprints, a little handwaving at character development, a plot that has characters doing dumb stuff, this is all going nowhere, and getting nowhere.

Yeow!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abxbVRhkODI

Need a new clock?

ANDREW LUDLOW’S is no ordinary ticker. An intricate tangle of tubes, cables and lasers occupying an entire room at his lab in Boulder, Colorado, it is one of the best timekeeping devices ever made. “It’s the Lamborghini of atomic clocks,” he says.

That isn’t to say it is fast. But Yb-2, as the clock is known, is precision engineered. In fact, it should measure out each passing second so precisely that it wouldn’t miss a beat for around 20 billion years – more than the age of the universe.

This is the stunning frontier of precision at which timekeeping now finds itself. Clocks such as Ludlow’s could spur on as yet unheard-of technological innovations. They could transform our understanding of the universe, revealing wrinkles in established laws of physics and variations in the fundamental constants of nature that would otherwise be impossible to detect. But for metrologists like Ludlow, they raise an even more fundamental question: is it time once again to redefine time? [“Inside the incredibly slow race to reinvent time“, Rachel Nuwer, NewScientist (22 August 2020)]

A little baffled by this fascination? Don’t be. If you use a GPS, it depends on proper measurement of time.

And, yet, time itself is quite the mystery. Good article. I don’t need that clock in my house, though.

I guess President Trump saw that poll in the Military Times concerning … his popularity:

Source: Military Times

The latest Military Times poll shows a continued decline in active-duty service members’ views of President Donald Trump and a slight but significant preference for former Vice President Joe Biden in the upcoming November election among troops surveyed.

The results, collected before the political conventions earlier this month, appear to undercut claims from the president that his support among military members is strong thanks to big defense budget increases in recent years and promised moves to draw down troops from overseas conflict zones.

But the Military Times Polls, surveying active-duty troops in partnership with the Institute for Veterans and Military Families (IVMF) at Syracuse University, have seen a steady drop in troops’ opinion of the commander in chief since his election four years ago.

Why do I say that? Because President Trump is indulging in his favorite reaction when some group appears to denigrate him – he’s punching back. From USA Today:

In a heretofore unpublicized recent memo, the Pentagon delivered an order to shutter Stars and Stripes, a newspaper that has been a lifeline and a voice for American troops since the Civil War. The memo orders the publisher of the news organization (which now publishes online as well as in print) to present a plan that “dissolves the Stars and Stripes” by Sept. 15 including “specific timeline for vacating government owned/leased space worldwide.”

“The last newspaper publication (in all forms) will be September 30, 2020,” writes Col. Paul Haverstick Jr., the memo’s author.

It’s rather like watching a petulant three year old take a swat at a tower of blocks, only to have it all come raining down on him, doesn’t it? In all likelihood, this’ll simply engender more politically independent troops to become Biden voters; only hardened Trump supporters will be unaffected, politically.

Fortunately, this venerable institution can be easily restored once this President is replaced. I hope.

And that graph is especially telling, isn’t it? From a 9 point advantage to a 12 point disadvantage over twelve years, it’s gotta say something about how a body of people whose culture includes commitment to discipline views the deeply undisciplined actions of this Administration. While the military does have its problems, at its core it believes not only in what it does, but in how it does it – and, Trump’s claims of being the military’s best friend notwithstanding, they are coming more and more to the realization that Trump shares very little with them.

Large, distributed enterprises require the careful selection of appropriate incentives in order to entice the humans who happen to inhabit them to, well, not pee in the corners. Dr. Stuart Ritchie has been looking into the twin problems of sloppy experiments and reproducibility, and talks about it in this interview in NewScientist (22 August 2020) – but, first, this:

WHEN Stuart Ritchie was a graduate student in Edinburgh, UK, in 2011, he was involved in an incident that shook his faith in science. With two colleagues, he tried and failed to replicate a famous experiment on precognition, the ability to see the future. They sent their results to the journal that published the original research and received an immediate rejection on the grounds that the journal didn’t accept studies that repeated previous experiments.

Which leaves me wondering just what this nameless journal is doing if it won’t publish retrospective studies. Since we’re talking precognition, a noted delusion, we can be fairly sure the experiment should have found nothing; if it did find something, then there was something wrong about it, and a careful survey of the study could be informative.

My sneaking suspicion is that the journals inhabiting the junk science part of the landscape are run by biased people – those who are convinced they’re studying real phenomenon, and whose livelihoods depend on that assertion.

But back to Ritchie:

How did we let the rot set in?

It crept in due to a system of perverse incentives. There’s huge pressure to publish papers and huge pressure to bring in grants – which is an incentive to publish papers and apply for grants, but not an incentive to discover the truth. We focus far too much on rewarding people who have brought in big grants or published papers in prestigious journals, which isn’t necessarily getting us what we want.

But there are checks and balances, like peer review, where independent experts vet papers before they are published…

It works in some cases, but it’s nowhere near the filter it needs to be. Some of the worst papers ever went through the peer-review system of the world’s best journals.

For instance, the system isn’t set up in a way that peer reviewers can easily get raw data. It’s absurd. The people who are supposed to be checking whether the analysis is correct rarely see the data that the claims are based on.

And so a lot of our knowledge of reality is, well, even more contingent than it should be.

What’s to be done? Perhaps every relevant discipline could support an Institute of Reproducibility (IoR), and every fresh post-doc could be expected to put in a year or two at their IoR. Papers lacking a notation in their IoR’s public database are considered dubious.

But, in a way, this is a patch on a systemic problem. This is really a fault of the institutes of higher learning that mostly exist to support research and teaching, and excellence in the former is proven by publishing – not in excellent publishing, but just publishing. As Ritchie points out, publishing is considered a pure good, when it should be considered a contingent good. The problem in this competitive system – for that’s how science is performed these days, and has, to a greater or lesser extent, since the Renaissance, whether it be in terms of prestige, individual and national, or profit-driven concerns – is that, incredibly, little credence is given to the possibility that someone’s study is wrong – despite the fact that RetractionWatch is flooded with news related to study retractions.

Oh, sure, there are noted retractions, such as the disgraced Dr. Wakefield’s notorious study erroneously connecting autism with vaccines, published in the top-flight journal Nature – a disastrous move that has cost many people their lives, for it was taken seriously for far too long by credulous people^[1]. While many folks would hold up its eventual retraction as proof that the system works, I’ll suggest that it was nothing more than the spasmodic reaction of a dying animal that happened to kick the conquering predator in the teeth – a symbolic victory, at best.

We need a sea-change in all of the culture surrounding science, including both the scientific community, and the lay community which benefits from science, to understand that a single, unconfirmed study is the moral equivalent of probable bullshit. Reproduce a study’s results in two or three repetitions, and then we know we may have something. And maybe a collection of IoRs is part of that change.

But, first, we have to impregnate society with that proper skepticism, and I don’t know how to get there.

¹ Although it doesn’t qualify as the start of the anti-vaxxer movement. My understanding is that the anti-vaccine movement more or less began with the introduction of the first vaccine, at least in Western culture.

As the season approaches its end, a few more random pics.

Here’s a depiction of just how bad the drought is on the West Coast, via WaPo:

And temperatures:

I wonder what sort of damage is being done to American agriculture.

Reuters is reporting on a new Republican, or former Republican, group announcing its support for Democrat Joe Biden:

Nearly 100 Republican and independent leaders will endorse Democrat Joe Biden for president on Thursday, including one-time 2020 Republican presidential candidate Bill Weld and the former Republican governors of Michigan and New Jersey, people involved in the effort told Reuters.

The latest Republican-led effort to oppose the re-election of President Donald Trump also includes current and former Republicans in the key battleground state of Michigan that will help decide the outcome of the Nov. 3 election, the group’s members said.

Called ‘Republicans and Independents for Biden’, the group is headed by Christine Todd Whitman, a former Republican governor of New Jersey who has become one of Trump’s fiercest critics and who spoke at the recent Democratic National Convention in support of Biden.

Steve Benen provides a comprehensive summary of Republicans Endorsing Biden here.

Source: Uncertain. Sort of like its future.

Skipping any jokes about how enthusiasm for Biden exceeds enthusiasm for Trump on the right side of the political spectrum, we may be seeing the beginning of the formation of a new Republican Party. The old Republican Party, the GOP, will continue its skid to the right, losing members who are, ironically, less and less moderate – but no longer acceptable to the Trumpists.

And while, in the short-term, the cavalcade of the more moderate Republicans to Biden will help ensure votes for Biden from the undecided independents and moderate Republicans, in the long-term many of these people are contributors to the pathological specimen that is the Republican Party. If they believe Trump is an anomaly and all will snap back to normal after Trump is roundly defeated, then they mistake their erstwhile Party.

This is nothing new for long-time readers. My themes on this matter are toxic team politics, religion and politics mixing and the consequent disdain for science, and, in common with the Democratic far-left, a palpable loathing for those fellow Americans who don’t fall into line with them, a belief that abortion should somehow be a crime, or, as I call it, the great crowbar of American politics, and those who disagree are intolerable monsters – rather than just folks with a differing opinion on a subject that some find difficult.

Without repairing these faults – a word that seems entirely inadequate to the situation – I fear a new Republican Party will suffer the same fate as it appears will befall the current GOP – taken over by any power-hungry and/or God-driven righteous person who can shout RINO! loudly enough.

Senator Barry Goldwater, right-wing fringer that he was, sure sounded the right alarm on this group.

Proper technique for sneezing is to turn your head and sneeze into your neighbor’s sleeve.

The Woman Eater (1958) is a story about a Dr Moran, whose unfettered ego soars far above his accomplishments, and it’s made him bitter. Having traveled to the Amazon and obtained a sample of a plant that exudes a sap that makes mankind immortal, now he seeks to refine it in the English countryside – by feeding the plant random women, who go to their fate inexplicably all wearing the same one-strap dress after being subjected to a drum-beat song from an Amazonian ex-pat.

Into this mess stumbles Dr Moran’s car mechanic, and the woman the mechanic rescues from an abusive circus situation, whose name might be Susan. He’s a bit of a lump, and her hula dancing fails to counter the depradations of the plant, but the local gendarmerie have been poking around, looking for missing women.

Well, Susan gets a job as a maid, inadvertently pushes out the housekeeper, and things go terribly wrong from there. The plant becomes underfed, and, well, it all comes to a flaming climax.

It’s a bit limp and dated, even if the monstrous plant is cool in that B-list movie monster way that evokes affection more than horror, but it remains a B-list movie. Maybe, after a couple of beers, you’ll enjoy this.

Then again, maybe not.

The Lincoln Project should write a thank-you note for Trump providing his own rope. If you haven’t heard about the “people in the dark shadows”, here it is:

He is crazy. He is unraveling.

Wake up. pic.twitter.com/YkhIl4FkUZ

— The Lincoln Project (@ProjectLincoln) September 2, 2020

The interviewer is Fox News host Laura Ingraham and Trump fan, and even she seems disbelieving of what she’s hearing.

Gnomon:

A gnomon (/ˈnoʊmɒn,ˈnoʊmən/, from Greek γνώμων, gnōmōn, literally: “one that knows or examines”) is the part of a sundial that casts a shadow. The term is used for a variety of purposes in mathematics and other fields. [Wikipedia]

Noted in “Everything you wanted to know about Joe Biden’s shadow people but were afraid to ask,” Alexandra Petri, WaPo:

I’m glad you asked. The Shadow People have been present ever since someone glancing at the Washington Monument realized that it was the gnomon of an ominous sundial and stood in its shadow as the sun set; within that shadow were bits of deeper shadow. That man was Henry Clay; it was because the Thing from the Shadow followed him patiently out of it that the presidency always eluded him. It was long thought that the Shadow People could not cross the Mississippi River but that turned out to be what they wanted us to believe. And if you stare into the Masonic eye on the dollar too long, something small and gray will flit out of it into your eye and, from that moment onward, you will not know rest.

Great rant!

Graham Lawton reports in NewScientist (22 August 2020) on the newest environmentalist goal:

Jackson’s theme was restoring the atmosphere, by which he means returning it to its pre-industrial state. Jackson said he was no longer satisfied with goals to keep warming to 1.5°C or some other arbitrary value, but longed to return the atmosphere to how it was before we started dumping carbon dioxide, methane and other pollutants into it.

Taking inspiration from the growing field of ecological restoration – intervening to help degraded ecosystems recover – he argued that we should treat the atmosphere as we do wetlands, forests or endangered species. We don’t merely aim to halt their destruction, but to nurse them back to full, pristine health. The atmosphere deserves no less. Think of it as rewilding the sky.

Yes, he admitted, it seems a “preposterous idea”. We can’t even stabilise levels of greenhouse gases, let alone reverse them. But, he said, with so much bad news we need a new narrative of hope. Temperature thresholds are abstract; normal people don’t relate to them. “They don’t provide a narrative that has, or will, lead to action.”

There is a certain importance in having impossible goals, because sometimes they’re not impossible.

But I’m wondering about the definition in this case. It might be great to have the atmosphere returned to some pristine state – even defining such a state strikes me as being problematic, unless you have large error bars. Really big ones, maybe. I mean, pristine can mean an atmosphere nearly empty of O₂, if you push back the time of your definition far enough.

But how about connecting the state of the atmosphere to the state of the environment? An endless chase after some indefinable pristinity may lose adherents, but chasing after removal of contaminants inimical to life is far more measurable – and good for both wildlife and humanity.

In the end, it’s hard to see this happening unless the size of humanity is shrunk, and in a peaceful manner, too. But I do look forward to seeing if this nascent movement thrives or deteriorates. I’ve been so wrong on my predictions on these sorts of things that I expect this one’ll take off.