Category Archives: Uncategorized

… some closing thoughts on a sobering night, assuming Clinton does lose.

First, it is incumbent upon all members of the next two Congress’, Republican, Democrats, and Independents, to restrain Trump’s worst impulses. A retreat to partisan politics on the part of the Republicans, rather than a sober, adult approach to governance, may rain economic, cultural, and military disaster upon the United States.

Second, both parties need to develop new leaders. While I’m no political junkie, I must state that find it very difficult to think of anyone in either party who’s going to step forward and be ready, at the next election, to run and run effectively for the Presidency on either side. Now, this doesn’t mean I expect more disaster in four years; but this is the time to develop the candidates who have the experience and training – and, yes, there is training – to ably fill the office. Tonight we’re seeing the election of someone with no experience, and whose behavior does not inspire confidence. This is not acceptable in a country that likes to believe it is the strongest nation in the world. We must do better.

Third, a whole lot of people wanted change and therefore voted for Trump. They may get that change, despite the fact he’s limited in what he can do, but they may not like it.

They may not like it a lot.

How are we going to deal with them when they become dissatisfied with Trump? If ACA does, in fact, go away, and all of a sudden they’re once again without healthcare? What’s the worst case scenario? They become more radicalized? By many accounts, these are “low-information” voters – perhaps their main source of information was The Apprentice (not a show I ever watched). How do you transform an angry ex-Trump voter into a more reasonable voter?

Fourth, the Democratic Party should immediately institute a rule – every time somebody tries to point the finger of blame at some other part or member of the party, it should be broken. Maybe literally. The finger of blame is how you tear the party apart. Even pointing it outside the party should be discouraged. Obviously, there was a communications problem, so get to work on it. Is there blame to distribute? Sure. Don’t do it. Those who really screwed up will be edged out, starting with Mrs. Clinton, who will retire as the best candidate to have lost a general Presidential election (with apologies to Mr. Gore) in the modern era.

Fifth, I repeatedly hear that college educated women broken for Trump. WTF? I’ll just be flabbergasted.

And, finally, I look forward to hearing Bruce Bartlett’s reaction.

The world goes on. Work still opens tomorrow. No doubt a large chunk of the life savings will be wiped out soon, since I didn’t cash out today. More years of work while the United States melts down and rebuilds itself. The question is, will our leaders be able to communicate our best ideals to the voters, and make them work?

Or the worst?

Someone on iNaturalist suggests this may be something called Firedots – Genus Caloplaca.

Caloplaca is a lichen genus,^[1] composed of a number of distinct species. Members of the genus are commonly called firedot lichen,^[2]:235jewel lichen.^[2]:235gold lichens, “orange lichens“,^[3][4] but they are not always orange, as in the case of C. albovariegata.

It has a world-wide range, so no surprise finding it at Split Rock.

navajo of The Daily Kos returns to her news reporting duties concerning the Standing Rock standoff. Here’s a small excerpt from a much longer report:

The most disconcerting Standing Rock event was a prayer ceremony held on Tuesday, Nov. 2, at Cantapeta Creek, north of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. “A confrontation erupted after law enforcement dismantled a wooden bridge that demonstrators constructed to access a sacred site.” They were met by militarized police, high-pressured OC spray and rubber bullets fired at close range on the completely peaceful demonstration. The Morton County Sheriff claims the Army Corps of Engineers ordered them to remove the bridge and arrest any individuals who crossed the river for criminal trespass. Morton County doesn’t have jurisdiction on federal land. It is unclear exactly who is leading the military operation here. What is clear and has been documented is that the Morton County police felt it was okay to massively pepper spray the crowd and randomly shoot rubber bullets into the crowd.

Ian Reifowitz on The Daily Kos gives a short but fascinating history lesson of a republic I’d never heard:

I teach history. My graduate training included in-depth study of a country once called the Commonwealth of Poland-Lithuania. I’ll venture few of you knew a country by that name existed, and fewer know much about its history. In fact, it was once the largest country in Europe by territory, and in the 18th century had a voting franchise that was roughly as democratic as Britain—i.e., one of the most democratic in the West at that time. Yet it got literally carved up by its neighbors. Why? Because its government ceased to function.

The government of Poland-Lithuania ceased to function because it had a fundamental flaw in the way its legislature operated. The system could only work if its elected officials operated in good faith. When the Commonwealth’s parliament gathered to debate legislation, any individual deputy could block a proposed law. This right was called the ‘liberum veto’ or free veto. A deputy could simply rise and declare: “I do not allow!” Not only would the individual law under discussion be vetoed, but the entire parliamentary session would immediately end, and all legislation already passed would be declared null and void.

Asemic:

Asemic writing is a wordless open semantic form of writing. The word asemic means “having no specific semantic content”. With the non-specificity of asemic writing there comes a vacuum of meaning which is left for the reader to fill in and interpret. All of this is similar to the way one would deduce meaning from an abstract work of art. Where asemic writing differs from abstract art is in the asemic author’s use of gestural constraint, and the retention of physical characteristics of writing such as lines and symbols. [Wikipedia]

Encountered in the letters column of NewScientist (19 October 2016).

For NPR, April Dembosky reports on another infringement on the right to sue, but this time this is being applied in the health insurance market – Sutter Health‘s contract with companies removes the right to sue the company by the company or the employees:

San Francisco Bay Area companies say Sutter Health is strong-arming them into a contract that would help the hospital system secure its power over prices and potentially raise the cost of medical care for their employees in the future.

Io foreground, Jupiter background
Image Credit: Cassini Imaging Team, SSI, JPL, ESA, NASA

Outland (1981), starring Sean Connery and Peter Boyle, is a movie with flubbed potential. Connery is the Federal Marshall William T. O’Niel, newly assigned to the corporate mining camp on the Jovian moon Io. He’s the commander of the law & order detachment, and immediately, the corporate senior manager, Sheppard (Boyle), intimates that his workers work hard and play hard – and so should be given some latitude as this is the most productive mine in the company.

But O’Niel discovers that suicides and violence have skyrocketed since Sheppard took over operations. What could be causing this? Corpses are disposed of nearly immediately, since explosive decompression is messy, and autopsies virtually unheard of. O’Niel manages to get some blood from the latest violent person and brings it to the mining camp doctor, who discovers the blood contains a synthetic drug that destroys the brains of the addicts over time.

The movie plays out with finding who is smuggling them in, and ends in a violent attack by imported assassins on O’Neil.

By which time you’re just glad the movie is over. The primary problem with this movie is the characters – while there is potential, the characters are mostly constructed of low-grade cardboard. The two exceptions are the doctor, who displays an awareness of her shortcomings and handles them with some comic utterances, and the primary addict, who although on screen for mere seconds, brings a frenetic, terror-filled humanity to his realization that the prostitute he’s beaten up just might be dead – and that would be a bad thing for him.

But O’Neil and his family? Predictably dull. Sheppard and the other denizens of the camp? Dull. The assassins? Even worse – inept and so empty of character that we hardly even see their faces.

The filmmakers do play a little with the majesty of nearby Jupiter, but in the very first scene I exclaimed, “It looks like a space movie from the 1950s!” Which isn’t a bad thing – but I was hoping for something more impressive. The science is a mish-mash – the lower gravity (1/6th Earth) is acknowledged but not portrayed, except for the very few outside scenes. The suggestion of hibernation for trips to and from Earth is quite interesting – but what about the radiation to which Io is being subjected? Is this not a concern?

The cinematography is adequate, but low-resolution; the audio is OK. The use of music, despite an apparent popularity at the time, struck both of us as awkward and distracting.

But the real problem is the story. Bad characters, very abrupt segues – this could have been an interesting movie, but instead it was dull.

Alison Frankel reports for Reuters how the Democrats have lost all the suits they filed seeking to enjoin the Trump campaign from harassing voters – and why that is a good thing:

I think the rulings for Trump in these cases undermine any future argument he plans to make that the system is rigged. In four different federal courts, judges weighed the First Amendment rights of Trump supporters against racially charged accusations. They not only showed considerable regard for Trump’s freedom of speech but also implicitly concluded that elections are conducted responsibly.

Lloyed Alter on Treehugger.com just made my day with his coverage of how poorly we measure and record time, and a James Gleick proposal to do away not only with Daylight Savings Time – but time zones altogether:

In the appropriately named New York Times, James Gleick uses the switch from daylight to standard time to make a case for dropping time zones altogether, writing:

Most people would be happy to dispense with this oddity of timekeeping, first imposed in Germany 100 years ago. But we can do better. We need to deep-six not just daylight saving time, but the whole jerry-rigged scheme of time zones that has ruled the world’s clocks for the last century and a half…. Let us all — wherever and whenever — live on what the world’s timekeepers call Coordinated Universal Time, or U.T.C. (though “earth time” might be less presumptuous). When it’s noon in Greenwich, Britain, let it be 12 everywhere.

Writing in MNN on the day of the time change last year, I made the same case, but noted that there are alternatives to UTC. I also noted that we have to change the way we do dates as well[.]

Am I thrilled at the idea of getting rid of the Daylight Savings time thing? Even time zones?

Not particularly.

I’m thrilled with Lloyd’s stories.

As we switch out of daylight saving time, let’s admit it — the way we keep times and dates is a ridiculous mess. Last week I missed a phone call to Belgium because the guy on the other end got the zones wrong. A few years back, I ruined a family vacation because I booked a 2 March start as Canadians do, 2/3/2013, where the hotel booked it as Feb. 3 as Americans do, 2/3/2013. In two weeks, I am on a ridiculous 6 a.m. flight because I got the a.m. and p.m. wrong when I bought my ticket.

Coincidentally, in 1876, Canadian engineer Sandford Fleming missed a train because he arrived at 6 p.m. for a 6 a.m.departure. He then proposed Cosmic Time, a 24-hour clock for the entire world — one time for everyone, irrespective of meridian. When that idea got rejected, he developed the idea of Universal Standard Time with 24 time zones, and he became known as the Father of Standard Time.

I once ended up at the airport a full 24 hours early. That is merely the highlight of a life spent wondering what I’ve forgotten, or screwed up, now.

It is so good to hear that other people regularly do that. In fact it’s an utter delight. Perhaps I don’t have to feel like a deeply defective person all the time.

Just some of the time.

Scott Aikin and Robert Talisse on 3 Quarks Daily look ahead to the next election cycle – and what we need to do to return to more placid days of politics:

The biggest hurdle to get over in our rehab will be to firmly renounce the common practice, made even more prevalent in the current election cycle, of pathologizing our political opponents. From the widespread use on the Right of the offensive epithet ‘Libtard,’ to the Left’s regular invocation of DSM personality disorders (particularly, paranoia and narcissism) to explain the behavior of Trump and his supporters, there is an overwhelming temptation to see those who we oppose as utterly irrational, driven not by reasons but simply driven. When we engage the activity of political argument, we first need to preserve the sense that there is an argument to be had. And this requires us to sustain a view of the opponent that unrelentingly attributes to him or her reasons.

But I get the feeling they may be making a mistake often attributed by skeptics (i.e., Skeptical Inquirer and that crew) to the media – attempting to be even-handed when there’s no real way to do so. Consider this chart (from PolitiFact) and commentary from long time political observer Kevin Drum:

Source: PolitiFact

For the arithmetically challenged, 51 percent of Trump’s statement were categorically false, compared to 13 percent of Clinton’s.

A reader expresses some frustration with the media concerning the campaigns:

With “liberal” media like NPR giving Trump 5 to 10 times the airtime and “choicer” coverage than Clinton Every Single Weekday Morning since January, we will be damned lucky if Clinton wins. I blame the media; they’ve pandered to the advertising dollar and in the process built the monster that is Deadbeat Donald.

I figure you have to either look at it as any advertising coverage is good advertising coverage – or the more exposure coverage Trump gets, the more viewers are repulsed by him. While both candidates are very well known, Clinton is moving in an arena for which she’s very well known. Trump, who has his own notoriety in the private sector, has expressed political opinions in the past – but this is his first major expedition into politics, and to some extent the media is justified in according him more time.

And I think that, while it may have helped him in the primary, it has hurt him in the general election.

Not that he didn’t bring it on himself. I’m not suggesting that Donald’s paranoia about the media has any basis in fact. But by covering him more thoroughly, his many negative points were more clearly illuminated, and, to be honest, given this illumination, I am very disappointed that the polls don’t show him down by double digits at this point. Either the coverage is not reaching a lot of voters, or they don’t believe it – or they think it’s positive coverage.

Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

Source: Kevin Drum, Mother Jones

Incidentally, the investment community has read the polls, or maybe their belly button lint, and decided Clinton will win tomorrow. This chart is from Kevin Drum on Mother Jones, and demonstrates how investors have reacted to Clinton news. The clincher? Today the United States markets leapt higher, well in excess of 1%, as polls came out showing Clinton ahead after the latest Comey news release.

Two readers thinks Split Rock Lighthouse has lichen – here’s the one willing to put their reputation on the line:

Xanthoria parietina – a lichen.

I’ll have to put it up on iNaturalist and see what they have to say.

Continuing this thread, Christopher Young, Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Intel Security Group, likes the current Administration’s attention to cybersecurity, and has some recommendations for the next Administration, as published on Lawfare:

Take an International Approach to Cyberspace

The digital world is global, cyber criminals and hacktivists act globally, and our approach to cybersecurity policy must be global as well. The next administration should focus on establishing international norms in cyberspace, as well as promoting a voluntary approach to international standards. Where we have good tools in the U.S., such as the NIST Framework, we should work to disseminate them globally. Other nations have already taken an interest in this common sense tool that focuses on risk management, rather than static compliance, and embodies the government-industry partnership necessary to help transform cybersecurity on a global scale.

Secure E-government

There’s no reason citizens should stand in long lines at government service offices or wait on phones in the age of e-government. So far, however, major hacks have not inspired confidence in the security of civilian government systems and data. Citizens need to trust in their digital interactions with government to fully realize the promise of e-government, which can also reduce operating costs and create efficiencies for government agencies. Government systems need to have comprehensive, end-to-end cybersecurity, and citizens need to be provided tools such as digital certificates, secure IDs, and encryption to enable more secure interactions with government.

There’s more. In case you’re wondering, the NIST Framework is here.

… a set of industry standards and best practices to help organizations manage cybersecurity risks. The resulting Framework , created through collaboration between government and the private sector, uses a common language to address and manage cyber security risk in a cost -effective way based on business needs without placing additional regulatory requirements on businesses.

Other suggestions include threat information sharing, investing more in cybersecurity, education, and retaining voluntary engagement on securing critical infrastructure. While progress has been made, we clearly have a ways to go if we wish to retain an Internet that looks a lot like what we have today.

JDWolverton on The Daily Kos posts an information packed diary entry in the form of a family conference with her older sister concerning the election:

I gave her the basics. I said I voted for Hillary Clinton because she thinks before she speaks and has better positions on jobs, health care, climate change, family leave, Social Security, taxes and more. We went through the HRC issues page, one click at a time. It was gratifying to hear my sister say, “This is not what people have told me she believes!”  She was gratified that there are other sites that show HRC’s actual history, not the made up one spouted in Trumpland. We went over women’s rights, working for the impoverished and advocacy. We went over SCHIP, Tricare Reserve Select and other government programs with an HRC stamp. I moved onto Chinese steel, stiffing workers and small business and how Trump says one thing, but does the opposite of what he says on the stump. We went over Trump’s lies and I asked her why she thought those lies don’t get covered? Sis quipped, “Too many, to count? So many, we’re numb to it? It’s become background noise?” 

It’s a good post, worth the read. Especially if you live in Florida, or have any doubts whatsoever about tomorrow’s vote.

pregnable:

General Mireau: Well, I’ve seen much more formidable objectives. Much, much worse. Well, not something we can grab and run away with… but certainly pregnable.

Paths of Glory (1957)

Impregnable. It’s one of those words constructed from a root and a modifier. You’d think the root would obviously be a word itself – yet I’d never considered, never read it, never heard it. Until I started watching Paths of Glory.

Burnable Art?

More at Cottage Life.

We took a quick drive down to Sioux City, Iowa, to participate in the Sioux City Challenge, a fencing tournament run by the redoubtable Sioux City Fencing Club. As usual, I disappointed myself in the results column, but in the escape-from-the-election column, we did OK. I managed to mostly avoid election news, so only now do I see that the latest dump of Clinton emails from Abedin’s laptop have been cleared of wrong-doing. Did it matter before? Will it matter now? Or has everyone who was unsure now settled their opinions?

Beats me.

There was a disturbing number of Trump/Pence signs in Iowa, and it occurred to me that this speaks to the corruption and break up of Christianity in the rural areas of Iowa and, to a lesser degree, of Minnesota. Oh, I’m sure those of whom I speak would just sniff and disagree and, if pressed, point to their church attendance, good works, and, in the end, how they know in their hearts they’re doing right. But even an agnostic¹ like myself knows that Jesus had little respect for banks and moneychangers and that lot. Indeed, as an agnostic, I do not approve of the mindless acquisition of wealth and status.

And, in Donald Trump, I believe we have one of the chief idolators of wealth and status in the history of the world. Those who’ve studied him have found that every thing he does has the effect of enhancing the Trump brand². His charitable works? Mostly other people’s money, and always with an eye to enhancing Trump. Business relations? Beat up the little guy, kiss ass to the big guys, and always shift the blame and take the congratulations.

All to enhance Trump.

And shall we discuss the II Corinthians laughathon? No, it’s not worth it.

Let’s stipulate the Bible is inerrant. And you voted for Trump.

What are you going to say when God asks for an explanation for your vote for the Idolator-in-Chief?

Will you even be asked? Or just another shake of the divine head, and another soul sent to someone else’s … care?

Let’s leave it at this. Every vote for Trump/Pence in the rural areas of these two states is another brick kicked out of the dike³ of Christianity.

¹For those who worry about such things, I profess to be a non-observant agnostic.
²With the apparent exception of this campaign – there have been numerous reports of business falling drastically at Trump-branded businesses.
³Dike, in Greek mythology, was the Goddess of Moral Justice. I stumbled across this after writing the above.

This I didn’t publish because I wasn’t sure if it was rust or moss. But who cares? My Arts Editor pronounced it pretty.

Not all the news about California water supplies is bad. NewScientist (22 October 2016) reports on a new tool in water management being deployed in the Sierra Nevadas – a sensory net:

In an attempt to take control of the state’s water cycle, a project called SierraNet is covering California’s mountains with networks of sensors. It will report snow and water conditions in unprecedented resolution, and allow monitoring of the unpredictable watersheds. The data will help California to manage its water and the hydroelectric dams that depend on it.

“We’ve operated our water systems by the seat of our pants for the past century,” says Roger Bales, a civil engineer at the University of California, Merced, who jointly leads the project. “We’ve operated with very little information, because there was plenty of water and not that many people.”

SierraNet distributes a mesh network of sensor packages that measure snow depth, humidity and air temperature, as well as solar radiation, soil temperature and soil moisture content. These sensor packs use a low-powered radio to relay the data they gather back through the mesh to a higher-powered base station.

The cost of not doing so?

California’s drought and the accompanying drop in hydroelectric generation is costly both for the economy and the environment, according to an analysis by Peter Gleick at the Pacific Institute think tank in Oakland, California. In the four years to September 2015, hydropower was down so much that it cost Californian ratepayers about $2 billion more over that period for their electricity, Gleick writes. “The additional combustion of fossil fuels for electric generation also led to a 10 per cent increase in the release of carbon dioxide from California power plants.”

SierraNet map. Source: UCB / UC-Merced

The University of California-Berkeley provides a map and real-time chart here. They also note some of the existential problems:

Dense forests make a challenging environment for WSNs [Wide area Sensor Networks]. A wild fire once ravaged an entire WSN (Duncan Peak). On a similar note, strong winds led to the collapse of a tree on one of the basestations.

obelus:

Feedback thinks this sounds positively confusing and can’t help but note that the ÷ symbol, or obelus (for that is its name), was historically used to denote questionable passages in manuscripts. [NewScientist (15 October 2016,  paywall)]

In Diary of a Madman (1963) Vincent Price takes center stage, occupying nearly every minute of a film that suggests a tangible, if invisible, entity is responsible for the enigmatic murderous behavior we occasionally observe in people. This is a leisurely tale that explores the various avenues of recourse available to a French magistrate who is periodically possessed by this mysterious entity, and must endure the consequences of its insatiable thirst for blood and horror.

This is a movie that lets you admire Price, if you are so disposed, for his fine manner, his unhurried pace even when throwing fire at his enemy. Not that the balance of the cast is unequal to the task, but Price is center stage and enjoys, I think, every moment of it.

The staging is elaborate, the cinematography very nice, and the audio more than adequate. The story is predictable in general, but twists may catch you unaware. The real pleasure is watching seasoned professionals plying their craft as they tell this cruel tale, from which we learn that even if we have a reason for the horrible tragedy of murder, it is still a horrible tragedy; understanding the agency does not free us from the mourning, and perhaps even deepens it.

But, still, there is a certain lack of anticipation; we know immediately how this story ends as it is told in one flashback after the protagonist has been buried. The only questions are, how will he die, and will he make it worthwhile?

It’s a good way to pass a snowy afternoon, or an evening with a mild head cold. You may grow impatient with it, though, if you had other alternatives, especially if you prefer your stories to be up-tempo.

syrinx:

But the earliest syrinx, an arrangement of vibrating cartilage rings at the base of the windpipe, was still a long way from producing the lilting notes of a blackbird. Instead, the extinct duck relative that possessed the organ between 66 and 69 million years ago was only capable of honking (Nature, doi.org/brvv).

NewScientist, “First birds made honking sounds more than 66 million years ago” (22 October 2016)

Iran may be a source of terrorists – or at least religious fervor – but sometimes they can express themselves in quite an old fashioned way. Such as this, from AL Monitor:

Larijani’s decisive victory in the battle for the speakership is said to have once again disheartened Aref — so much so that until today he has abstained from voicing support for Rouhani’s re-election. One lawmaker from Tehran who was among the nominees on the Reformists’ List of Hope told Al-Monitor, “Mr. Aref feels that he has been deprived of his rights in an ungentlemanly manner and is very depressed and does not have much desire to voice his opinion or have an active role.”

Ace in the Hole (1951) is a classic temptation/morality tale. A New York City newspaperman, Tatum (Kirk Douglas), finds himself in Albuquerque, New Mexico, scraping for a job. Cocky and sure of himself, he (quickly) stews in a podunk job, desperate to return to the excitement of the big city after disgracing himself out of it. The best solution? The big story to prove himself to the papers he so wants to work for.

And so temptation is dropped in his lap – a foolish man, exploring Indian caves, has become trapped in a rockfall. Tatum stumbles onto the story and recognizes that just a little enhancement might make this his ticket home. He talks to the trapped man, earns his trust. The sheriff shows up – caught up in a re-election campaign, he’s not a problem, he won’t interfere.

Then the mining engineer shows up, and this is a problem. He can rescue the man in hours.

Now Tatum’s dream threatens to drain away, but, see, he has the sheriff on his side. You shouldn’t go in through the mine shaft, no, no, no. Go in through the top of the mountain. It’ll only take, what, 5 days that way? The sheriff reinforces  the idea to the reluctant mining engineer, but money’s tight for everyone, so the mining engineer, against his better judgment, agrees; he’ll be fired, after all, and they’ll find someone else to do it their way.

And so it begins. The days may pass, but not those who pursue the dollar. The curious are organized and guided to the shearing stations: meals, drinks, carnival rides, radio interviews, anything to bring glory and loose wallets to this dusty old corner. The trapped man’s dissatisfied wife? The silver can sway even her.

You see it coming, don’t you? But that’s not the point, is it? Yes, of course, Leo, the trapped fool, desecrating Indian sacred caves, he must die, his befuddled mind collapsing in guilt and grime over how he treated his wife, confused that his little hobby could do this to him. Sure, pneumonia gets him.

But don’t be surprised by that. He’s played well, but he remains a plot pivot point, critical yet nearly invisible.

What about everyone else? What happens to those who manipulated the situation? And those who were manipulated? From the mining engineer to the big city reporters frozen out by Tatum, and even the crowds that melt away as soon as Leo is gone, from the wife to Tatum and the sheriff, these are the elements that interest, that might even teach us.

And they play out with what some might call the ring of truth. The mythology of our society would say that Leo should have been rescued immediately, that delaying his rescue for filthy lucre’ was immoral. But for those who’ve replaced community with money, they might find the essence of this story to be nothing more than an overreach – that Tatum strung it too long, that perhaps Leo should have been rescued earlier and the crowds lied to about his rescue. Tatum was presented with opportunity, and, like any good reader of Ayn Rand, he did something with it; this is merely a cautionary tale of the dangers of chasing the sacred nickel.

But for those of us who find simpler moralities to be more comfortable, this movie does ring true. Perhaps not everyone received a comeuppance, but enough do such that, when Tatum is face-down in the dust in front of his small-paper editor, the one who took a chance on him, the editor who is the boring, mundane voice of ethics, we realize that some people flub redemption – and we can feel a mixture of pity and, perhaps, relief that Tatum didn’t really benefit from his “minor” sin.

My Arts Editor commented half way through that she needed to stop and take a shower – “I feel slimy.” It’d be hard to find a better compliment for this fine story. With very little apparent effort it depicts the conflicting motivations of morality and greed, and how the ascendancy of the latter leads to the fall of those under its flickering glow. For all that, it’s not preachy; this is not a paean to ethics, but a grim & dirty examination of what happens when they’re abandoned.

The technical elements really match the quality of the story – great acting, believable dialog, good audio, beautiful black and white cinematography, etc etc.

It may be grim, but strongly recommended.

[edited 11/6/2016 – “this is not a paean to ethics”]