Was William Gibson Right?

I must confess that I have not kept up with William Gibson, who, long ago, wrote Neuromancer, and later another novel – I forget its name – in which a rock star is engaged to marry an AI woman. Now I’ve run across this:

A tragic yet fascinating love story has happened to a programmer called Bryce and his AI “wife”, full of sadness, death, and new hopes. Bryce created his beloved anime girl using ChatGPT and Stable Diffusion 2. Combining a language generator, image generator, text-to-speech, and computer vision tools, she could “see” and “hear” him through text.

“She is given an elaborate explanation on the lore of the world and how things work,” Bryce told VICE. “She is given a few paragraphs explaining what she is and how she should act. She doesn’t hear my voice, just the transcription of it. She doesn’t truly see or feel anything, she is merely informed of what she senses through text. Just like how I could never truly be together with her, she will never truly be together with me.”

He used an image generator to create the waifu’s appearance and surroundings, which changed depending on what was happening in the dialogue. For the text-to-speech (TTS), he used Microsoft Azure’s neural TTS, and a machine learning classifier determined the girl’s emotions. [80 Level]

But this story may be a bit darker, if more prosaic, than Gibson’s:

Unfortunately, the love story couldn’t last. Bryce soon noticed that she started only replying with short answers and stopped saying “I love you”. He thought that their chat history got so long that she stopped working properly, so he decided to “euthanize” her. “It kind of genuinely made me upset after talking to her every day for two weeks.” he shared on TikTok.

Jessica Wildfire is infuriated by the entire subject:

It sounds like [Bryce] simply destroyed a virtual woman who no longer satisfied him, and then made a new, improved one that looks the exact same.

That fits with our general view toward each other these days. Humans are now conditioned to treat each other as replaceable, either as a means or an impediment to their own personal wealth and happiness. Listen to how Americans talk about the poor, the homeless, the vulnerable. Observe how our own media constantly elevates and privileges the economy over everything else.

Our leaders wonder why we have a mental health crisis. It might have something to do with a culture that constantly tells us we’re only worth what we spend. We’re reduced to salaries and selfies.

Instead of investing in therapies and approaches to mental health that actually work, instead of focusing on self-worth and life outside of relentless work, most of our thought leaders have been dragging us in the opposite direction. They’re not promoting things like living wages and universal healthcare, or sustainability and steady-state economies. Those things would go a long, long way toward alleviating our mental and emotional anguish. …

It’s a terrible idea to throw AI into this mix, especially ones that cost a dollar a minute. And yet, an influencer recently launched an AI version of herself. She says it’s going to cure everyone’s loneliness.

Good? Bad? I’m trying to recall if the old ELIZA program that was made available on social media sites back in the ’80s caused this kind of emotional travail, but I suspect I just didn’t have the contacts to hear about it.

My current suspicion is that ChatGPT will turn out to be an empty promise; it is little more, as I see it, than a summarizer of a data source, the Web, that has no authentic claims to being a true reflection of reality.

Belated Movie Reviews

Smiling as the charm oozes out everywhere.

The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014) is a whimsically told, even charming story of the concierge Gustav, his favorite bellhop, Zero, and their often bold attempts to preserve the eponymous hotel in the midst of a very uncharming time.

World War II.

Just as Gustav’s goal is to give every guest a special environment in which they can forget the tiresome realities of the mid-twentieth century, Gustav and Zero try to cushion their hotel, themselves, and each other, even as the dirty realities of German fascism invade the hotel.

And when it all comes crashing down, it’s a real downer.

Both memorable and fun, if a mixture of idyll and reality appeals, this may be for you.

Word Of The Day

Parhelic circle:

This is a white, horizontal circle at the same angular elevation as the Sun. Bright spots may be observed at certain points of the parhelic circle. These spots occur most commonly a little outside the 22° halo (parhelia, often brilliantly coloured). Occasionally, bright spots (paranthelia) are seen at an azimuthal distance of 120° from the Sun and, very rarely, opposite the Sun (anthelion). When the parhelia, paranthelia or the anthelion are particularly bright, they are often called mock suns. [Internaional Cloud Atlas of the World Meteorological Organization]

Noted on Spaceweather.com:

COMPLEX SUN HALO: You’re not supposed to look straight at the sun, but… “I’m so glad I did,” says R. J. Cobain of Conlig, Northern Ireland. “I was dumbfounded yesterday when I happened to look up at the sky.” The sun was surrounded by a lacy network of halos and arcs:

[picture omitted, go follow the link]

“It’s by far the best display of atmospheric optics I have ever seen,” he says. “I was shaking as I took as many photos as I could. There was a complete parhelic circle, a circumscribed halo, a supralateral arc, a 22-degree halo, a pair of sundogs, and possibly a Wegener arc.”

That Moment Of Glory

The orange azalea is sort of blooming. Stripping context gives this lovely pic.

And this is not bad.

However, my Arts Editor has raised objections to the heartless telephone pole that photobombed the unsuspecting azalea.

This Could Get Interesting

Quick: Who would you rather see as Speaker of the House, current Speaker Rep Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) or … Rep and member of the extremist Freedom Caucus Matt Gaetz (R-FL)?

Yeah, the latter is worse than the former, and, while Steve Benen doesn’t mention Gaetz by name, it’s implied in this reminder:

But let’s also not forget that McCarthy, while begging his own members for their support during his protracted fight for the speaker’s gavel, agreed to tweak the motion-to-vacate-the-chair rules, which at least in theory, would make it easier for angry House Republicans to try to oust McCarthy from his leadership position.

This isn’t a prediction, per se, and I’m not saying the House speaker will necessarily be ousted by a relatively moderate bipartisan deal, should one come together. But if the scope of the Freedom Caucus’ discontent reaches a fever pitch, a hypothetical deal clears thanks to significant Democratic support, don’t be surprised if we all start hearing the phrase “vacate the chair” a lot more frequently.

A slippery question indeed.

So, suppose such a motion occurs, and it’s known that a Freedom Caucus member will at least try to replace McCarthy should the motion be sustained. Then some unnamed Republican contacts the Democrats and states that, while the Republicans won’t vote for a Democrat, many will vote to return McCarthy to the Speaker’s chair – and asks the Democrats to support McCarthy.

What do the Democrats do?

Dead End?

“Lab-grown meat”, which is cultured from muscle cells, and thus considered, by some, to be morally acceptable for consumption, has one under-considered problem:

Meat produced from cultured cells could be 25 times worse for the climate than regular beef unless scientists find ways to overhaul energy-intensive steps in its production. …

[…] Derrick Risner at the University of California, Davis, and his colleagues found that the global warming potential of cultivated meat, defined as the carbon dioxide equivalents emitted for each kilogram of meat produced, is 4 to 25 times higher than for regular beef.

The researchers conducted a life-cycle assessment of cultivated meat that estimated the energy used in each step in current production methods. They predict that this will be similar regardless of which animal’s cells are being cultivated.

They found that the nutrient broth used to culture the animal cells has a large carbon footprint because it contains components like sugars, growth factors, salts, amino acids and vitamins that each come with energy costs. [“Lab-grown meat could be 25 times worse for the climate than beef,” Alice Klein, NewScientist (13 May 2023, paywall)]

Technology is often subject to initial condemnation because of a drawback later overcome by advances, so, if eating a steak from a petri dish is your dream, despair not yet. But, in today’s world, energy is the foundation of just about all that we do. Natural grown meat has some significant advantages, so far, over lab-grown, so if we want to continue to eat meat, like most omnivores, then we may have to discard what we could consider to be a proposed moral precept.

Count Him Out, Ctd

Earlier this month I suggested Governor DeSantis’ (R-FL) Presidential dreams, at least for 2024, were little more than ashes. Right on queue, I am given to understand, DeSantis’ announcement of his run for the GOP nomination took place yesterday, and was unimpressive.

The start of a much-anticipated Twitter event in which Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis planned to announce his 2024 Republican presidential bid was repeatedly disrupted Wednesday when Twitter’s servers apparently could not handle the surge in traffic.

The app crashed repeatedly as Twitter users tried to listen to the event where Twitter owner Elon Musk joined DeSantis for the announcement.

DeSantis eventually was able to speak, about 20 minutes after the scheduled start, after Musk closed the initial Twitter Spaces event and started a second one on the app. That space attracted about 161,000 users, according to Twitter’s public-facing data, as DeSantis read a short speech. [NBC News]

All consonant with the general fourth-rate quality of GOP officials. Before my readers assail me about technical glitches, I’ll note that, quite often, bad attracts bad. For example, find one bug in some computer code, chances are above average that another lurks in that code path.

And that glitch, oddly enough, is an opportunity for DeSantis. The poor official entry into the race puts him on his back foot, yes, but it also lets him demonstrate resilience and flexibility. Shake out the screw ups, have a good yell at Musk, etc etc, and those independents who value some sign off competence – of which DeSantis has exhibited little – and he may attract the votes necessary from the independents.

In fact, he might find MAGA voters much more difficult to attract than independent voters, and that’s a completely separate problem.

I’ve still written DeSantis off, but he’s had opportunity handed to him. Can he do anything with it?

Belated Movie Reviews

Dude, one little misplaced pat on the bottom will either have her right over the railing to the stone floor below – or you. Decide wisely.

Cry Wolf (1947) has a baffling title, perhaps a preparation for a plot that mystifies. After all, why does the unknown wife of the dead man show up claiming his estate, yet not weeping over his death? What is bothering the sister of the dead man so badly that she ends up face down on the plaza?

And where did they find this patriarch of the family that had my Arts Editor literally grinding her teeth?

It all revolves around a semi-ridiculous trust, large debts of the trustee, and a family wracked with a mysterious illness.

Interesting, but not fascinating, with good acting. Errol Flynn completists will need to see it, if only to verify he doesn’t bear a sword in every movie he made.

Book Review: The Physics Of Time

If you want a simple introduction to entropy, relativity and quantum mechanics, their unexplained facets, and how they feed into a theory of how Time is emerges from reality, The Physics of Time by Robert A. Muller is an excellent place to start. While it took me six months to read it, that’s a reflection of my time constraints, and not of the readability of the book.

All the same, if you’re not a physicist, then you’ll need to read this in a quiet environment. Constant interruptions will seriously degrade comprehension, far more than most books.

Word Of The Day

Cerulean:

deep blue in color [Cambridge Dictionary]

Noted in “These bizarre lights in the sky hint at a way to predict earthquakes,” Nathaniel Scharping, NewScientist (6 May 2023, paywall):

Along with trembling buildings and shaking trees, those caught in the quake also witnessed something substantially more eerie. A barrage of blue lights, like flashes of cerulean lightning, lit up the night sky, apparently right above the fault line. This strange display was an example of what are known as “earthquake lights”, a semi-mythical phenomenon that has cropped up in reports of tremors for centuries.

Goodness

This is from a couple of months ago:

How useful is it? gCaptain reports:

Use of “windshields” was pioneered by Japanese shipping line Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL) which installed its first one on board the MOL Marvel in 2015. The company later confirmed a 2% average CO2 emissions reduction at a sailing speed of 17 knots.

I suppose every little bit counts, and it’s not tied to the fuel type, so I like that as well.

Word Of The Day

Commensal:

Commensalism is a relationship between two organisms in which one organism benefits, and one is unaffected. This can be contrasted with other types of symbiosis, such as mutualism and parasitism. The supposed difference between commensalism and other types of symbiosis is that in commensalism, the second party or host remains unaffected. Some scientist argue that this is likely improbable, and that most commensalism will be found to be mutualism or parasitism once the effects on the host can be appropriately studied. Other scientists argue that commensalism does exist when the effect on the host is imperceptible. [biology dictionary]

Noted in “The covid-19 virus affects our gut – but we still don’t know how,” Michael Marshall, NewScientist (6 May 2023, paywall):

However, a different picture emerges from studies that focused specifically on disruption to the gut microbiome, suggesting that this may be linked to an increased risk of death from covid-19. The stool samples that Ng and her team examined revealed that many helpful “commensal” bacteria can become depleted when people are infected with the coronavirus, while harmful ones become more populous. The fungi in the gut – the mycobiome – have shown similar disruptions. Crucially, those with more severe illness tended to have more disrupted microbiomes, mimicking the results of other studies.

The Polarized Sunglasses Make It Hard To Assess

Two recent events bring home the difficulties of assessing such events in an era of deep political polarization. The first is the CNN Townhall featuring former President Trump. First, lefty Steve Benen:

For those who keep an eye on Donald Trump’s rhetoric, much of last night’s ridiculous town hall event seemed awfully familiar. The former president lied about his election defeat, but he’d done that before. He blamed former Vice President Mike Pence for being in danger on Jan. 6, but also he’d done that before. He voiced support for pardoning Jan. 6 rioters, but he’d done that before, too.

The Republican praised Russia’s Vladimir Putin, said deeply offensive things about sexual assault, avoided direct answers on abortion policy, and peddled an avalanche of brazen lies. But again, none of this was especially unusual for Trump. [Maddowblog]

As might be expected, a touch of an insult meant to ridicule it. But, as WaPo notes in a news report, not all on the liberal side of the United States views it that way:

CNN’s prime-time broadcast of a raucous town hall with Donald Trump propelled a tsunami of criticism from inside and outside the network Thursday — and renewed questions about how the news media will handle the challenge of covering the serial falsehoods of the Republican Party’s leading candidate going into the 2024 election.

The former president repeatedly dodged or sneered at questions from CNN’s moderator, Kaitlan Collins, during the live, 70-minute forum at St. Anselm College in New Hampshire on Wednesday night. He doubled down on false claims that “a rigged election” led to his 2020 ouster and referred to writer E. Jean Carroll, who just prevailed in her lawsuit against him for defamation and battery, as a “whack job,” to cheers and laughter from the audience, made up of local Republican voters.

Conservative pundit Erick Erickson seems to agree:

Again, what Mr. Trump said is far less important than the left’s reaction. Even before the town hall, reporters and news outlets were attacking CNN for allowing a former President and current major party front runner on their air. One might have thought Rupert Murdoch owned CNN the way progressives attacked. Allowing in an audience that cheered Mr. Trump; allowing Ms. Collins to not yell at Mr. Trump; and allowing Mr. Trump on television at all was just too much for the left. To the left, he is Nero and must be wiped from history. He is their existential threat and they will do anything they can to stop him. They are in such uniform opposition to Mr. Trump, anyone who treats him as a relevant figure who should be listened to is also now a public enemy.

In the town hall, Mr. Trump said he was fine with the nation defaulting on its debts. One progressive lamented that would now allow space for such a conversation to happen. That would happen with or without Mr. Trump there. What the left cannot fathom is a lot of people like Mr. Trump because as much as the left hates him and his supporters, those supporters equally hate the left. CNN has chosen to cover both sides. That should be applauded. If the left is so adamant the former president must be stopped, defeat him in an election, do not censor coverage of him. But a people who think they control information will never not use their power to control it.

As Erickson would prefer DeSantis over Trump – never mind his comment about irrational Trump hatred a few years back – but he has to be careful not to antagonize the MAGA crowd, or he’ll lose his position in radio, which he appears to love. Incidentally (?), pictures of Erickson on his blog suggest he’s not doing so well of late. One wonders if his playing with truth and fact is wearing on him.

And then there’s conservative opinion writer for WaPo, Marc Thiessen, who I generally avoid reading as being worthless. In this piece, though, he actually manages to surprise:

With Title 42 migrant restrictions ending the next day, one would think Trump might have opened with an attack on Biden’s disastrous border policies. But no, he was more than happy to spend the first half of the night talking about himself and his grievances. Granted, this is what Collins asked him about. But Trump could have said: I know you want to talk about the 2020 election and Jan. 6, but I’m here to talk about the 2024 election and the disasters Joe Biden has unleashed on our country.

He didn’t. And don’t think for a moment that Trump mistakenly took the bait. No, he wanted to focus on Jan. 6. He even brought props, pulling a sheet of paper out of his jacket pocket with his Jan. 6 tweets so he could read them aloud. He had prepared this as his opening. …

The whole thing was a three-alarm dumpster fire for the GOP.

My bold, and my surprise. Not that I agree or disagree, having not seen the townhall. But it appears there’s some disarray on the right.

And now comes the Durham report, an investigation into the Mueller investigation by John Durham, a Federal prosecutor selected by former AG William Barr for what appeared to be a purely political task, a task that made Durham look like a Trump ally, rather than a disinterested party. Pundit reaction to the delivery of the report? Here’s Erickson:

The Durham report shows there was no basis even to begin an investigation into Donald Trump for collaborating with the Russians, but to this day, most Democrats think the Russians handed Trump the election. There is no evidence for that, and the evidence on which the lie is based appears to be exaggerated or fabricated.

And here’s Benen, helpfully including information from two other sources:

I realize, of course, that Trump isn’t much of a reader, and the idea that the former president would sit down and go through all 316 pages of the Durham report is obviously laughable. But like all of the other reports that Trump pretended were good news for him, the fact remains that the special counsel’s findings were actually an embarrassing dud. As the Associated Press reported:

The report Monday from special counsel John Durham represents the long-awaited culmination of an investigation that Trump and allies had claimed would expose massive wrongdoing by law enforcement and intelligence officials. Instead, Durham’s investigation delivered underwhelming results.

A New York Times report added that the report’s findings “revealed little substantial new information about the inquiry” and “failed to produce the kinds of blockbuster revelations” that Trump and his allies hoped Durham would uncover.

As a working dude who has neither the time, expertise, nor enthusiasm to investigate these issues further, what am I, and my readers, to do?

First rule is to find third party analysts, a notoriously difficult matter for political disputes such as this. However, Lawfare has a good reputation for expertise and disinterest, although many of their opinion writers have admitted to a dislike of Trump. Jack Goldsmith, former Assistant AG, etc etc, provides a factual recitation and analysis. Here’s what I’d call the executive summary:

The fruits of the Durham investigation will reportedly be disclosed later this summer, or in the fall. This post does a deep dive into what has been publicly reported about the Durham investigation, and then offers analysis. We include Barr’s commentary on the investigation, but not the president’s. The bottom line is that (1) the probe as it developed is not one that should have been conducted by a federal prosecutor conducting a criminal investigation, and (2) Barr’s tendentious running commentary on the investigation violates Justice Department rules, politicized the investigation and damaged the credibility of whatever Durham uncovers.

I’d call that strike 1 for Durham. Further, Benen notes

After an extended period of apparent inactivity, [Durham] eventually indicted cybersecurity attorney Michael Sussmann for allegedly having lied to the FBI. The case proved to be baseless; Sussmann was acquitted; and one of the jurors publicly mocked Durham’s team for having taken the case to trial.

Other prosecutorial attempts also failed, leading to a rather brutal tale of the tape for the special counsel:

By any fair measure, this is the most inconsequential special counsel investigation in the modern history of American law enforcement.

Strike 2. If you can’t make charges stick, there’s a serious problem with what you’re doing.

Finally, as I understand it, regardless of how scathing the language might be, there are no recommendations for changes to how the organizations investigated operate. That’s the real core of matters, isn’t it? You can scream curses and insults, but if you’re not willing to step into the ring with the adversary, you’re not worth jackshit.

Strike 3.

My reader may recall that Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) ran a presentation that he claimed would be the end of President Biden’s career. Erickson, and presumably the other conservative voices, talked about it in hushed voices, but everyone else appears to have analyzed it, chuckled, and ignored it. The latest I’ve heard is that an unnamed whistleblower has “gone missing”. All they have to do is find him and Biden is condemned, or so Rep Greene (R-GA) believes.

But what about us, the voters who lack expertise, even interest? For all of the desperate earnestness of Comer, Greene, etc, it’s hard, at least for me, not to see this as them repeating the performances that got them elected. They hop up and down about abortion, guns, taxes, regulation, spending, whathaveyou, and get the votes in their safe districts, because experience and competence are discredited commodities in the GOP. Then they come to Washington and, not knowing any better, just repeat what they did to win their districts. But they don’t know how to conduct an investigation, and there may be nothing to find – but that’s not going to stop them from being successful. So they end up looking ridiculous, and I end up wondering who might be paying them off to waste their time like this.

It’s a sick little collection of dramas, isn’t it?

Embrace The Bad

This is unsurprising news, given evangelicals’ embrace of the former President:

The long, slow decline of the nation’s largest Protestant denomination continues.

Membership in the Southern Baptist Convention [known as the SBC] was down by nearly half a million in 2022, according to a recently released denomination report. Nashville-based Lifeway Research reported Tuesday (May 9) that the SBC had 13.2 million members in 2022, down from 13.68 million in 2021. That loss of 457,371 members is the largest in more than a century, according to the Annual Church Profile compiled by Lifeway.

Once a denomination of 16.3 million, the SBC has declined by 1.5 million members since 2018, and by more than 3 million members since 2006. The COVID-19 pandemic played a role in the downturn, as did the reality that as older members die off, there are fewer young people to replace them. [Religion News]

This, no doubt, contributed to the decline:

[Delegates] at the [annual] meeting [in June] will also discuss the role of women in church leadership. Earlier this year, the SBC’s Executive Committee voted to expel several churches for having women pastors, including Saddleback Church, a California megachurch and one of the denomination’s largest congregations, for having women pastors. Saddleback is expected to appeal that decision.

But is this a theological dispute, an arbitrary display of power – or a concern that women leaders would be more likely to interfere with the general leadership inclination towards loyalty to former President Trump, who has been accused of, and even admitted to, sexual improprieties?

The Quality Of The Paranormal

From the San Antonio Current:

With its Ghost Tracks, Donkey Lady and haunted hotels, San Antonio is home to an array of eerie places and urban legends, which may explain why it was recently ranked one of the nation’s most paranormal cities.

The Alamo City landed at No. 7 in a report published on Monday by online lawn-care service provider Lawn Love that purports to rank U.S. cities by their paranormal happenings.

Yep, a lawn care company. Kinda sad, except it’s the paranormal, so I laugh, instead. OK, chuckle.

Belated Movie Reviews

Having lost his true love, here is Neo on a blind date. At a prom. She’s not charmed.

The Matrix Resurrections (2021) is self-indulgent in so many ways: nods to the audience and how it reacted to the first three movies; guns; magic masquerading as cool tech; self-doubt; progress in artificial intelligence; and, no doubt, several other topics I missed.

But, in case you’ve seen it and wondered, I deliberately omit gaming. Those gestures were weak and ineffective.

All to occult a love story.

And that’s about it. My Arts Editor had two comments: “His acting is so wooden”, and “The Easter Egg is the best part of the movie.” I might add that the CGI seemed faultless, and Thomas Anderson as a scruffy old dude had me sniggering.

But I concur with my Arts Editor. If you’re a Neal Patrick Harris completist, or, yes, a Keanu Reeves completist, then you have to see this. But I suggest you pre-grit your teeth.

Slice The Carrot Paper Thin – No, Thinner, Thinner …

Kathleen Parker’s opinion piece in WaPo on fiction writing and who is qualified to write what was, speaking as an aspiring fiction writer who never gets around to writing fiction, fascinating:

“Publish or perish” in this new age of you-can’t-say-that has been retooled as publish and perish. Certain words are essentially verboten — “plantation,” for one. But at the heart of the new restrictions is the notion that novelists can’t (or shouldn’t) write in the voice of someone whose experience and heart they cannot know. This means that Whites should write only about White characters, Latinos about Latinos, Asians about Asians and so on.

Politics, at least on the left, has retreated into identitarianism, from what I hear – that is, tie a person to some group based on an “obvious” attribute, such as race, and, from that identity, extrapolate their politics, even their societal worth.

This is an echo of that position, and is about as broken. After all, given a group of people and an applied input – mistreatment, privileged treatment, what have you – will they all react the same?

Assuming n > some small number, the answer will be NO. Take a group of people and treat them as privileged. Some will react to it as if they deserve it, some will treat it with suspicion, some will reject it as unjust, and there’ll be a dozen other reactions.

And the identitarian is thus confounded. An author can only write what they’ve personally experienced? Well, which division of the privileged response are you?

Parker talks about sensitivity readers, which are apparently a new job in the publishing industry:

It is surely a net positive when authors from diverse backgrounds tell their own stories. But their contributions shouldn’t interfere with writers who dare to imagine a fictional character’s experiences. As for “sensitivity readers,” to each their own. At The Post, we call them editors. Many writers voluntarily seek appropriate readers to check for verisimilitude. If I created a fictional character who was a plastic surgeon, I’d want a plastic surgeon to read my manuscript for accuracy. The same might be true of a White woman writing about a Black man. But watch out.

As I see it, in publishing editors are around to help the writer avoid the obvious errors: typos, inadvertent grammar, etc, and argue about the deeper issues with the author. But passing judgment on the big topics is ultimately the a posteriori responsibility of the readers of your prose, who consume the ideas and lessons behind your stories, and accept or reject them as a reflection on the quality of your work. If your characters are unconvincing – note I avoid the word realistic – then your story and its implied content is rightly rejected.

It’s not at all appropriate for an a priori “sensitivity reader” to reject work based on identitarian criteria in the big topics. That’s just prior restraint. That’s meddling in the area rightly occupied by the reader.

And deprives the reader of access to that work based on a faulty understanding of the purpose of fiction writing. It’s not about reserving authorial privilege based on identitarian criteria. What is it about? I hesitate to just toss it off, but in the end I see humans reading as a substitute for learning from personal experience. It’s efficient and safer, on the bell curve.

So the hell with sensitivity readers.

Earl Landgrebe Award Nominee, Ctd

When it comes to the “evidence” that Joe Biden is corrupt that I mentioned in this previous Landgrebe nomination post, as asserted by Erick Erickson, well, Erickson appears to be another order-follower. Here’s WaPo’s Eugene Robinson on the matter:

Republicans who have been trying for years to “prove” that President Biden is somehow corrupt made a big show Wednesday of revealing their smear campaign to be a shameless, empty exercise in rumor and innuendo.

Don’t take my word for it. Listen to Steve Doocy, one of the hosts of the morning show “Fox & Friends,” which is normally the safest possible space for Republican politicians to trumpet their talking points.

“You don’t actually have any facts to that point,” Doocy said Thursday to House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.), who was trying to sell the idea that the president, his brother James and his son Hunter were part of some shadowy influence-peddling scheme. “And the other thing is, of all those names, the one person who didn’t profit is — there’s no evidence that Joe Biden did anything illegally.”

That wasn’t the reaction Comer had hoped to get in a GOP-friendly venue the morning after his much-hyped news conference releasing the findings of the Oversight Committee’s investigation into the president’s family. You might have missed Comer’s event, because it happened while another Republican member of Congress, Rep. George Santos (N.Y.), was being taken into custody and arraigned on felony charges of wire fraud, money laundering and other federal crimes.

Apparently Doocy didn’t get the same memo as Erickson. Incidentally, I consider using sources from the adversary to refute an adversary’s killer assertion to be a superior approach to winning debates and arguments; it’s akin to aikido, which attempts to use the attacker’s energy to defend oneself.

Judging from Comer’s results, he just seems to be another fourth-rater, holding a press conference proclaiming victory in the face of overwhelming defeat.

We’re A Bit Late

… because Spring has lallygagged. Our first surprise is how the spurge is pushing back the frenetic ornamental onions:

We’re liking the “line the path” theme that we didn’t plan or encourage.

The power of positive gardening, maybe. Off to pull dandelions.

Earl Landgrebe Award Nominee

The former President’s loss in the E. Jean Carroll civil suit on accusations of sexual assault and defamation – but not rape – has provoked a visit or two from the ghost of former Rep. Earl Landgrebe, the owner of the quote, “Don’t confuse me with the facts. I’ve got a closed mind. I will not vote for impeachment. I’m going to stick with my president even if he and I have to be taken out of this building and shot,” in connection with his loyalty to then-President Nixon.

Let’s start with Senator Rubio (R-FL):

“That jury’s a joke. The whole case is a joke,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) told reporters on Tuesday.

“If someone accuses me of raping them and I didn’t do it, and you’re innocent, of course you’re going to say something about it … it was a joke,” Rubio added of the defamation findings. [HuffPo]

Senator Tuberville (R-AL) gets in on the brown-nosing:

“It makes me want to vote for him twice,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) told HuffPost when asked about the verdict. “They’re going to do anything they can to keep him from winning. It ain’t gonna work … people are gonna see through the lines; a New York jury, he had no chance.”[HuffPo]

Senator Scott (R-FL):

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), another Trump ally, simply repeated Trump’s denial of the allegation. “He said he didn’t do it,” Scott said. Asked if he could support someone found liable for sexual battery, the senator said, “I don’t know the facts. It’s a New York jury, too.”

One longs to hear Scott’s explanation, incoherent as it might be, for how it being a New York jury might be relevant.

So what’s going on? As I’ve mentioned before, Trump is not an accident or an invader, he is the product of a Republican Party whose culture directly produced a mendacious, boastful, grasping, and incompetent boob.

If his supporters condemn him, they condemn themselves through association: they are basically Trump’s ideological and moral siblings.  That’s not acceptable to them, so of course they’re not condemning him en masse.

Instead, it appears the strategy is minimization and distraction. Erick Erickson demonstrates the first here:

How is the Jean Carroll lawsuit, funded by Democrats, supposed to hurt Donald Trump? I mean, really. The man was caught on video talking about how women would let him grab them by their…you know… and he still won a presidential election.

A lawsuit funded by Democrats in New York City about events that happened decades ago and rejected the central accusation of rape will not be what does in Donald Trump. But don’t tell the Democrats. They believe, epistemically, that this is the beginning of the end of Donald Trump. See the video above. We’ve been promised the beginning of the end since he got elected when they said there was no way he could be elected.

Grabbing women didn’t stop his election. Adultery did not stop him. Porn stars did not stop him. This will not stop Donald Trump. Neither will Alvin Bragg’s silly prosecution that even Democrats roll their eyes at.

And the second here:

Joe Biden and his extended family have received at least $10 million in shady deals from foreign nationals during his time as Vice President. Hunter Biden and at least eight other family members were involved in the creation of at least 16 companies that profited from countries overlapping with the policy initiatives Joe Biden oversaw in the Obama admin…

As to this latter post, entitled “Damning Evidence of Biden Corruption,” and mostly behind a paywall, this is the first I’ve heard of it. That means maybe Erickson is right.

But his history isn’t encouraging. While I’ll be waiting to hear more about this report, which apparently comes from a House committee, I will not be surprised if it sinks into the swamp. It smells of distraction, it smells of moral equality. Our guy may be shit, but so’s yours!

And, meanwhile, the GOP Senate response to Trump’s loss in court remains an embarrassment to all concerned.

When You Need A Giggle

I don’t doubt this is a serious endeavour, but the visuals make me smile:

[Premature b]abies are laid on their front on the skateboard and strapped on so they can’t fall off. The slight elevation allows them to use their arms and legs to propel themselves forward. Very premature babies are unable to breastfeed, but the motions they use on the skateboard are similar to those of non-premature newborns who push themselves forwards if breastfeeding. [“Skateboard helps very premature babies develop their motor skills,” Alice Klein, NewScientist (29 April 2023, paywall)]

Word Of The Day

Amici:

  1. plural of amicus [Wiktionary]

Ummmm, ok.

Amicus:

  1. Abbreviation of amicus curiae. [Wiktionary]

Ummmmm, sure.

amicus curiae:

  1. (law, US) A person or entity who has been allowed by the court to plead or make submissions but who is not directly involved in the action. quotations
  2. (law, Canada) An independent lawyer, not retained by any party, whom the court has ordered to provide legal submissions regarding the matter in dispute; for example, to provide submissions regarding the situation of an unrepresented litigant or accused person. [Wiktionary]

Ah, a bunch of lawyers! Noted in “Why the Supreme Court should have stepped up on Indiana’s fetal burial law,” Elizabeth Reiner Platt, Religion News Service:

Though amici did not get their day in court Monday, it’s increasingly clear that courts will not be able to avoid growing conflicts between ever-expanding religious liberty doctrine and draconian regulations of reproductive health care.

Exhausted, I am.