The Reason To Condemn Most Investors

From WaPo:

Experts say that even advanced AI doesn’t match the writing skills of a human: It lacks personal voice and style, and it often churns out wrong, nonsensical or biased answers. But for many companies, the cost-cutting is worth a drop in quality.

Too many “businessmen” think it’s all about the money, and that, in turn, is driven by investors convinced that their claims on returns come before the customers, before the employees, before quality.

I look forward to the next manual that is badly written and wrong.

Will There Be A Tennessee Two-Step?

[This post was prepared May 24 and then I forgot about it. It’s not particularly time-sensitive, so here it is.]

Steve Benen provides a useful summary of the embarrassing nature of the Tennessee legislature, although it’s not complete, as he didn’t even mention the Speaker of the Tennessee House is under investigation for not living in the district he represents, as Tennessee law requires.

As I read it, what struck me about it is that American voters have a long history of not tolerating corruption, and in Tennessee we’re seeing it on a personal level: apparent sexual assault, gerrymandering, which is another issue Benen didn’t cover, outright lying in order to be elected, expulsion of members calling Republicans to account, refusing to at least consider the will of the voters, and no doubt some things I’ve forgotten.

And what’ll come up next week?

But my point is that the Republican Party, which is rapidly entering the corruption phase predicted by their toxic team culture, the denigration of experience and expertise, the arrogant religious component, and the RINO attack plan, all issues well-covered by critics, will continue to degrade itself until the American public, disgusted by their behaviors, boots the Republicans’ pack of fourth-raters out of power and into the nearest polluted river.

You can get the popcorn, but I fear the salt will be unpalatably bitter.

The Busiest Minnesota Mall is Lifting Its Face

And that’s all I know of changes at Rosedale, a couple of miles from where I live.

Granite City had a notice posted indicating they’re permanently closed; others said they were moving. The rest? I don’t know. Oh, except AMC is not closing or moving. Too new, I’d guess.

The Puppy Tries To Please

Herb Lin on Lawfare is perturbed by an answer from ChatGPT in response to the question “what is herb lin known for” and followups, such as this:

Overall, Herb Lin is known for his expertise and leadership in the field of cybersecurity and for his efforts to advance cybersecurity policies and practices at the national level.

Me: what does Lin believe about DEI issues

ChatGPT:
Herb Lin has been an advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the technology sector and the cybersecurity community. He has written and spoken about the importance of diversity in building a more robust and effective cybersecurity workforce.

Lin has emphasized that diversity in the cybersecurity workforce is critical to addressing the complex and evolving nature of cybersecurity threats. In a 2018 article, he wrote that “a diverse workforce helps us think about problems differently, come up with new solutions, and approach the world in a more nuanced way.” He has also argued that a lack of diversity can lead to blind spots and groupthink, which can make it harder to identify and respond to cyber threats.

Comment: Though I believe this statement, and I would have happily said it, I never did. I never wrote an article in 2018 (or in any other year) that even touched on these points. …

I find this short exercise with ChatGPT quite alarming. Everything that ChatGPT says about me is plausible at least to some extent. Indeed, it correctly attributes my views on password security and DEI regarding the cyber workforce. It did so well that I had to ask myself, “Wait a moment—did I ever testify as it reported?” Even though it came close enough to hitting the mark that I had to check, the bottom line is I never said or wrote any of those things, and yet it completely made up references to papers it said I had written and to testimony it said I had given.

If even I had a bit of trouble determining if ChatGPT was making accurate statements about me, what would anyone else have thought? Anyone, even people with some familiarity with my work, could have read the ChatGPT transcript and believed it in its entirety, because it’s entirely plausible. The made-up citations add tremendously to the transcript’s credibility. To identify the falsehoods in the transcript, someone would have had to have a reason to request a citation, and then to track down the actual citation online (to discover it was made up).

It sounds like a puppy trying to please, with no reference to morality.

Which is, of course, not surprising. But if this thing were to develop self-agency … !

That Puzzling Behavior?

Midway through the debt ceiling crisis, the House GOP’s Freedom Caucus is now out of the loop – and not at all happy, as Politico notes:

Conservative angst over the debt deal is threatening to trigger Kevin McCarthy’s biggest fear — a push to oust him from the speakership.

Rep. Dan Bishop (R-N.C.) on Tuesday became the first House conservative to explicitly state he is considering a push to strip McCarthy of the gavel over his recent deal with President Joe Biden.

“Absolutely,” Bishop told POLITICO in an interview, when asked about using the tool to force out a sitting speaker. “It is inescapable to me. It has to be done.” …

… Rep. Ken Buck, who raised the issue on a private call with House Freedom Caucus members on Tuesday. Buck asked the group’s chair, Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), whether any of his fellow members were planning to trigger what’s known as a motion to vacate, the Colorado Republican recalled in an interview Tuesday.

On the call, Buck claimed that McCarthy’s deal violated his promise to conservatives during the January speaker fight, when he promised to return Congress to pre-pandemic spending levels. Perry’s response, according to Buck, was: “Let’s see, it’s premature.”

This behavior should be perplexing to even casual politics watchers, much less the citizen who, despite identifying with Democrats or Republicans, is uninterested in the entire process. Surely all of the conservative angst on display must mean something terrible is happening.

Right?

No.

Remember that today’s Republican Party is no longer built on a respect for competency and experience. No, those who attend party primaries, and in those Districts willing to elect these Reps, the conservative Republicans disdain those who might be competent, those who are experienced.

And that means compromise, even recognition of traditional American political practices, is a denigrated, not respected, attribute of a politician.

Instead, these folks are elected on their performances. They hop up and down on modern conservative issues such as abortion, fiscal responsibility, taxes, gun control, and, because they have nothing else in their quivers of value, they compete on extremism. Now they’re in Congress and have no idea how to conduct the public’s business as humble servants. Instead, what got them elected will be how they conduct themselves.

So now they’re publicly dismayed. A compromise happened. It’s terrible. It’s a disaster. Quick, guys, put on your tuxedos, it’s bloody time to perform.

That’s today Republican Party.

Was William Gibson Right?

I must confess that I have not kept up with William Gibson, who, long ago, wrote Neuromancer, and later another novel – I forget its name – in which a rock star is engaged to marry an AI woman. Now I’ve run across this:

A tragic yet fascinating love story has happened to a programmer called Bryce and his AI “wife”, full of sadness, death, and new hopes. Bryce created his beloved anime girl using ChatGPT and Stable Diffusion 2. Combining a language generator, image generator, text-to-speech, and computer vision tools, she could “see” and “hear” him through text.

“She is given an elaborate explanation on the lore of the world and how things work,” Bryce told VICE. “She is given a few paragraphs explaining what she is and how she should act. She doesn’t hear my voice, just the transcription of it. She doesn’t truly see or feel anything, she is merely informed of what she senses through text. Just like how I could never truly be together with her, she will never truly be together with me.”

He used an image generator to create the waifu’s appearance and surroundings, which changed depending on what was happening in the dialogue. For the text-to-speech (TTS), he used Microsoft Azure’s neural TTS, and a machine learning classifier determined the girl’s emotions. [80 Level]

But this story may be a bit darker, if more prosaic, than Gibson’s:

Unfortunately, the love story couldn’t last. Bryce soon noticed that she started only replying with short answers and stopped saying “I love you”. He thought that their chat history got so long that she stopped working properly, so he decided to “euthanize” her. “It kind of genuinely made me upset after talking to her every day for two weeks.” he shared on TikTok.

Jessica Wildfire is infuriated by the entire subject:

It sounds like [Bryce] simply destroyed a virtual woman who no longer satisfied him, and then made a new, improved one that looks the exact same.

That fits with our general view toward each other these days. Humans are now conditioned to treat each other as replaceable, either as a means or an impediment to their own personal wealth and happiness. Listen to how Americans talk about the poor, the homeless, the vulnerable. Observe how our own media constantly elevates and privileges the economy over everything else.

Our leaders wonder why we have a mental health crisis. It might have something to do with a culture that constantly tells us we’re only worth what we spend. We’re reduced to salaries and selfies.

Instead of investing in therapies and approaches to mental health that actually work, instead of focusing on self-worth and life outside of relentless work, most of our thought leaders have been dragging us in the opposite direction. They’re not promoting things like living wages and universal healthcare, or sustainability and steady-state economies. Those things would go a long, long way toward alleviating our mental and emotional anguish. …

It’s a terrible idea to throw AI into this mix, especially ones that cost a dollar a minute. And yet, an influencer recently launched an AI version of herself. She says it’s going to cure everyone’s loneliness.

Good? Bad? I’m trying to recall if the old ELIZA program that was made available on social media sites back in the ’80s caused this kind of emotional travail, but I suspect I just didn’t have the contacts to hear about it.

My current suspicion is that ChatGPT will turn out to be an empty promise; it is little more, as I see it, than a summarizer of a data source, the Web, that has no authentic claims to being a true reflection of reality.

Belated Movie Reviews

Smiling as the charm oozes out everywhere.

The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014) is a whimsically told, even charming story of the concierge Gustav, his favorite bellhop, Zero, and their often bold attempts to preserve the eponymous hotel in the midst of a very uncharming time.

World War II.

Just as Gustav’s goal is to give every guest a special environment in which they can forget the tiresome realities of the mid-twentieth century, Gustav and Zero try to cushion their hotel, themselves, and each other, even as the dirty realities of German fascism invade the hotel.

And when it all comes crashing down, it’s a real downer.

Both memorable and fun, if a mixture of idyll and reality appeals, this may be for you.

Word Of The Day

Parhelic circle:

This is a white, horizontal circle at the same angular elevation as the Sun. Bright spots may be observed at certain points of the parhelic circle. These spots occur most commonly a little outside the 22° halo (parhelia, often brilliantly coloured). Occasionally, bright spots (paranthelia) are seen at an azimuthal distance of 120° from the Sun and, very rarely, opposite the Sun (anthelion). When the parhelia, paranthelia or the anthelion are particularly bright, they are often called mock suns. [Internaional Cloud Atlas of the World Meteorological Organization]

Noted on Spaceweather.com:

COMPLEX SUN HALO: You’re not supposed to look straight at the sun, but… “I’m so glad I did,” says R. J. Cobain of Conlig, Northern Ireland. “I was dumbfounded yesterday when I happened to look up at the sky.” The sun was surrounded by a lacy network of halos and arcs:

[picture omitted, go follow the link]

“It’s by far the best display of atmospheric optics I have ever seen,” he says. “I was shaking as I took as many photos as I could. There was a complete parhelic circle, a circumscribed halo, a supralateral arc, a 22-degree halo, a pair of sundogs, and possibly a Wegener arc.”

That Moment Of Glory

The orange azalea is sort of blooming. Stripping context gives this lovely pic.

And this is not bad.

However, my Arts Editor has raised objections to the heartless telephone pole that photobombed the unsuspecting azalea.

This Could Get Interesting

Quick: Who would you rather see as Speaker of the House, current Speaker Rep Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) or … Rep and member of the extremist Freedom Caucus Matt Gaetz (R-FL)?

Yeah, the latter is worse than the former, and, while Steve Benen doesn’t mention Gaetz by name, it’s implied in this reminder:

But let’s also not forget that McCarthy, while begging his own members for their support during his protracted fight for the speaker’s gavel, agreed to tweak the motion-to-vacate-the-chair rules, which at least in theory, would make it easier for angry House Republicans to try to oust McCarthy from his leadership position.

This isn’t a prediction, per se, and I’m not saying the House speaker will necessarily be ousted by a relatively moderate bipartisan deal, should one come together. But if the scope of the Freedom Caucus’ discontent reaches a fever pitch, a hypothetical deal clears thanks to significant Democratic support, don’t be surprised if we all start hearing the phrase “vacate the chair” a lot more frequently.

A slippery question indeed.

So, suppose such a motion occurs, and it’s known that a Freedom Caucus member will at least try to replace McCarthy should the motion be sustained. Then some unnamed Republican contacts the Democrats and states that, while the Republicans won’t vote for a Democrat, many will vote to return McCarthy to the Speaker’s chair – and asks the Democrats to support McCarthy.

What do the Democrats do?

Dead End?

“Lab-grown meat”, which is cultured from muscle cells, and thus considered, by some, to be morally acceptable for consumption, has one under-considered problem:

Meat produced from cultured cells could be 25 times worse for the climate than regular beef unless scientists find ways to overhaul energy-intensive steps in its production. …

[…] Derrick Risner at the University of California, Davis, and his colleagues found that the global warming potential of cultivated meat, defined as the carbon dioxide equivalents emitted for each kilogram of meat produced, is 4 to 25 times higher than for regular beef.

The researchers conducted a life-cycle assessment of cultivated meat that estimated the energy used in each step in current production methods. They predict that this will be similar regardless of which animal’s cells are being cultivated.

They found that the nutrient broth used to culture the animal cells has a large carbon footprint because it contains components like sugars, growth factors, salts, amino acids and vitamins that each come with energy costs. [“Lab-grown meat could be 25 times worse for the climate than beef,” Alice Klein, NewScientist (13 May 2023, paywall)]

Technology is often subject to initial condemnation because of a drawback later overcome by advances, so, if eating a steak from a petri dish is your dream, despair not yet. But, in today’s world, energy is the foundation of just about all that we do. Natural grown meat has some significant advantages, so far, over lab-grown, so if we want to continue to eat meat, like most omnivores, then we may have to discard what we could consider to be a proposed moral precept.

Count Him Out, Ctd

Earlier this month I suggested Governor DeSantis’ (R-FL) Presidential dreams, at least for 2024, were little more than ashes. Right on queue, I am given to understand, DeSantis’ announcement of his run for the GOP nomination took place yesterday, and was unimpressive.

The start of a much-anticipated Twitter event in which Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis planned to announce his 2024 Republican presidential bid was repeatedly disrupted Wednesday when Twitter’s servers apparently could not handle the surge in traffic.

The app crashed repeatedly as Twitter users tried to listen to the event where Twitter owner Elon Musk joined DeSantis for the announcement.

DeSantis eventually was able to speak, about 20 minutes after the scheduled start, after Musk closed the initial Twitter Spaces event and started a second one on the app. That space attracted about 161,000 users, according to Twitter’s public-facing data, as DeSantis read a short speech. [NBC News]

All consonant with the general fourth-rate quality of GOP officials. Before my readers assail me about technical glitches, I’ll note that, quite often, bad attracts bad. For example, find one bug in some computer code, chances are above average that another lurks in that code path.

And that glitch, oddly enough, is an opportunity for DeSantis. The poor official entry into the race puts him on his back foot, yes, but it also lets him demonstrate resilience and flexibility. Shake out the screw ups, have a good yell at Musk, etc etc, and those independents who value some sign off competence – of which DeSantis has exhibited little – and he may attract the votes necessary from the independents.

In fact, he might find MAGA voters much more difficult to attract than independent voters, and that’s a completely separate problem.

I’ve still written DeSantis off, but he’s had opportunity handed to him. Can he do anything with it?

Belated Movie Reviews

Dude, one little misplaced pat on the bottom will either have her right over the railing to the stone floor below – or you. Decide wisely.

Cry Wolf (1947) has a baffling title, perhaps a preparation for a plot that mystifies. After all, why does the unknown wife of the dead man show up claiming his estate, yet not weeping over his death? What is bothering the sister of the dead man so badly that she ends up face down on the plaza?

And where did they find this patriarch of the family that had my Arts Editor literally grinding her teeth?

It all revolves around a semi-ridiculous trust, large debts of the trustee, and a family wracked with a mysterious illness.

Interesting, but not fascinating, with good acting. Errol Flynn completists will need to see it, if only to verify he doesn’t bear a sword in every movie he made.

Book Review: The Physics Of Time

If you want a simple introduction to entropy, relativity and quantum mechanics, their unexplained facets, and how they feed into a theory of how Time is emerges from reality, The Physics of Time by Robert A. Muller is an excellent place to start. While it took me six months to read it, that’s a reflection of my time constraints, and not of the readability of the book.

All the same, if you’re not a physicist, then you’ll need to read this in a quiet environment. Constant interruptions will seriously degrade comprehension, far more than most books.

Word Of The Day

Cerulean:

deep blue in color [Cambridge Dictionary]

Noted in “These bizarre lights in the sky hint at a way to predict earthquakes,” Nathaniel Scharping, NewScientist (6 May 2023, paywall):

Along with trembling buildings and shaking trees, those caught in the quake also witnessed something substantially more eerie. A barrage of blue lights, like flashes of cerulean lightning, lit up the night sky, apparently right above the fault line. This strange display was an example of what are known as “earthquake lights”, a semi-mythical phenomenon that has cropped up in reports of tremors for centuries.

Goodness

This is from a couple of months ago:

How useful is it? gCaptain reports:

Use of “windshields” was pioneered by Japanese shipping line Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL) which installed its first one on board the MOL Marvel in 2015. The company later confirmed a 2% average CO2 emissions reduction at a sailing speed of 17 knots.

I suppose every little bit counts, and it’s not tied to the fuel type, so I like that as well.

Word Of The Day

Commensal:

Commensalism is a relationship between two organisms in which one organism benefits, and one is unaffected. This can be contrasted with other types of symbiosis, such as mutualism and parasitism. The supposed difference between commensalism and other types of symbiosis is that in commensalism, the second party or host remains unaffected. Some scientist argue that this is likely improbable, and that most commensalism will be found to be mutualism or parasitism once the effects on the host can be appropriately studied. Other scientists argue that commensalism does exist when the effect on the host is imperceptible. [biology dictionary]

Noted in “The covid-19 virus affects our gut – but we still don’t know how,” Michael Marshall, NewScientist (6 May 2023, paywall):

However, a different picture emerges from studies that focused specifically on disruption to the gut microbiome, suggesting that this may be linked to an increased risk of death from covid-19. The stool samples that Ng and her team examined revealed that many helpful “commensal” bacteria can become depleted when people are infected with the coronavirus, while harmful ones become more populous. The fungi in the gut – the mycobiome – have shown similar disruptions. Crucially, those with more severe illness tended to have more disrupted microbiomes, mimicking the results of other studies.

The Polarized Sunglasses Make It Hard To Assess

Two recent events bring home the difficulties of assessing such events in an era of deep political polarization. The first is the CNN Townhall featuring former President Trump. First, lefty Steve Benen:

For those who keep an eye on Donald Trump’s rhetoric, much of last night’s ridiculous town hall event seemed awfully familiar. The former president lied about his election defeat, but he’d done that before. He blamed former Vice President Mike Pence for being in danger on Jan. 6, but also he’d done that before. He voiced support for pardoning Jan. 6 rioters, but he’d done that before, too.

The Republican praised Russia’s Vladimir Putin, said deeply offensive things about sexual assault, avoided direct answers on abortion policy, and peddled an avalanche of brazen lies. But again, none of this was especially unusual for Trump. [Maddowblog]

As might be expected, a touch of an insult meant to ridicule it. But, as WaPo notes in a news report, not all on the liberal side of the United States views it that way:

CNN’s prime-time broadcast of a raucous town hall with Donald Trump propelled a tsunami of criticism from inside and outside the network Thursday — and renewed questions about how the news media will handle the challenge of covering the serial falsehoods of the Republican Party’s leading candidate going into the 2024 election.

The former president repeatedly dodged or sneered at questions from CNN’s moderator, Kaitlan Collins, during the live, 70-minute forum at St. Anselm College in New Hampshire on Wednesday night. He doubled down on false claims that “a rigged election” led to his 2020 ouster and referred to writer E. Jean Carroll, who just prevailed in her lawsuit against him for defamation and battery, as a “whack job,” to cheers and laughter from the audience, made up of local Republican voters.

Conservative pundit Erick Erickson seems to agree:

Again, what Mr. Trump said is far less important than the left’s reaction. Even before the town hall, reporters and news outlets were attacking CNN for allowing a former President and current major party front runner on their air. One might have thought Rupert Murdoch owned CNN the way progressives attacked. Allowing in an audience that cheered Mr. Trump; allowing Ms. Collins to not yell at Mr. Trump; and allowing Mr. Trump on television at all was just too much for the left. To the left, he is Nero and must be wiped from history. He is their existential threat and they will do anything they can to stop him. They are in such uniform opposition to Mr. Trump, anyone who treats him as a relevant figure who should be listened to is also now a public enemy.

In the town hall, Mr. Trump said he was fine with the nation defaulting on its debts. One progressive lamented that would now allow space for such a conversation to happen. That would happen with or without Mr. Trump there. What the left cannot fathom is a lot of people like Mr. Trump because as much as the left hates him and his supporters, those supporters equally hate the left. CNN has chosen to cover both sides. That should be applauded. If the left is so adamant the former president must be stopped, defeat him in an election, do not censor coverage of him. But a people who think they control information will never not use their power to control it.

As Erickson would prefer DeSantis over Trump – never mind his comment about irrational Trump hatred a few years back – but he has to be careful not to antagonize the MAGA crowd, or he’ll lose his position in radio, which he appears to love. Incidentally (?), pictures of Erickson on his blog suggest he’s not doing so well of late. One wonders if his playing with truth and fact is wearing on him.

And then there’s conservative opinion writer for WaPo, Marc Thiessen, who I generally avoid reading as being worthless. In this piece, though, he actually manages to surprise:

With Title 42 migrant restrictions ending the next day, one would think Trump might have opened with an attack on Biden’s disastrous border policies. But no, he was more than happy to spend the first half of the night talking about himself and his grievances. Granted, this is what Collins asked him about. But Trump could have said: I know you want to talk about the 2020 election and Jan. 6, but I’m here to talk about the 2024 election and the disasters Joe Biden has unleashed on our country.

He didn’t. And don’t think for a moment that Trump mistakenly took the bait. No, he wanted to focus on Jan. 6. He even brought props, pulling a sheet of paper out of his jacket pocket with his Jan. 6 tweets so he could read them aloud. He had prepared this as his opening. …

The whole thing was a three-alarm dumpster fire for the GOP.

My bold, and my surprise. Not that I agree or disagree, having not seen the townhall. But it appears there’s some disarray on the right.

And now comes the Durham report, an investigation into the Mueller investigation by John Durham, a Federal prosecutor selected by former AG William Barr for what appeared to be a purely political task, a task that made Durham look like a Trump ally, rather than a disinterested party. Pundit reaction to the delivery of the report? Here’s Erickson:

The Durham report shows there was no basis even to begin an investigation into Donald Trump for collaborating with the Russians, but to this day, most Democrats think the Russians handed Trump the election. There is no evidence for that, and the evidence on which the lie is based appears to be exaggerated or fabricated.

And here’s Benen, helpfully including information from two other sources:

I realize, of course, that Trump isn’t much of a reader, and the idea that the former president would sit down and go through all 316 pages of the Durham report is obviously laughable. But like all of the other reports that Trump pretended were good news for him, the fact remains that the special counsel’s findings were actually an embarrassing dud. As the Associated Press reported:

The report Monday from special counsel John Durham represents the long-awaited culmination of an investigation that Trump and allies had claimed would expose massive wrongdoing by law enforcement and intelligence officials. Instead, Durham’s investigation delivered underwhelming results.

A New York Times report added that the report’s findings “revealed little substantial new information about the inquiry” and “failed to produce the kinds of blockbuster revelations” that Trump and his allies hoped Durham would uncover.

As a working dude who has neither the time, expertise, nor enthusiasm to investigate these issues further, what am I, and my readers, to do?

First rule is to find third party analysts, a notoriously difficult matter for political disputes such as this. However, Lawfare has a good reputation for expertise and disinterest, although many of their opinion writers have admitted to a dislike of Trump. Jack Goldsmith, former Assistant AG, etc etc, provides a factual recitation and analysis. Here’s what I’d call the executive summary:

The fruits of the Durham investigation will reportedly be disclosed later this summer, or in the fall. This post does a deep dive into what has been publicly reported about the Durham investigation, and then offers analysis. We include Barr’s commentary on the investigation, but not the president’s. The bottom line is that (1) the probe as it developed is not one that should have been conducted by a federal prosecutor conducting a criminal investigation, and (2) Barr’s tendentious running commentary on the investigation violates Justice Department rules, politicized the investigation and damaged the credibility of whatever Durham uncovers.

I’d call that strike 1 for Durham. Further, Benen notes

After an extended period of apparent inactivity, [Durham] eventually indicted cybersecurity attorney Michael Sussmann for allegedly having lied to the FBI. The case proved to be baseless; Sussmann was acquitted; and one of the jurors publicly mocked Durham’s team for having taken the case to trial.

Other prosecutorial attempts also failed, leading to a rather brutal tale of the tape for the special counsel:

By any fair measure, this is the most inconsequential special counsel investigation in the modern history of American law enforcement.

Strike 2. If you can’t make charges stick, there’s a serious problem with what you’re doing.

Finally, as I understand it, regardless of how scathing the language might be, there are no recommendations for changes to how the organizations investigated operate. That’s the real core of matters, isn’t it? You can scream curses and insults, but if you’re not willing to step into the ring with the adversary, you’re not worth jackshit.

Strike 3.

My reader may recall that Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) ran a presentation that he claimed would be the end of President Biden’s career. Erickson, and presumably the other conservative voices, talked about it in hushed voices, but everyone else appears to have analyzed it, chuckled, and ignored it. The latest I’ve heard is that an unnamed whistleblower has “gone missing”. All they have to do is find him and Biden is condemned, or so Rep Greene (R-GA) believes.

But what about us, the voters who lack expertise, even interest? For all of the desperate earnestness of Comer, Greene, etc, it’s hard, at least for me, not to see this as them repeating the performances that got them elected. They hop up and down about abortion, guns, taxes, regulation, spending, whathaveyou, and get the votes in their safe districts, because experience and competence are discredited commodities in the GOP. Then they come to Washington and, not knowing any better, just repeat what they did to win their districts. But they don’t know how to conduct an investigation, and there may be nothing to find – but that’s not going to stop them from being successful. So they end up looking ridiculous, and I end up wondering who might be paying them off to waste their time like this.

It’s a sick little collection of dramas, isn’t it?

Embrace The Bad

This is unsurprising news, given evangelicals’ embrace of the former President:

The long, slow decline of the nation’s largest Protestant denomination continues.

Membership in the Southern Baptist Convention [known as the SBC] was down by nearly half a million in 2022, according to a recently released denomination report. Nashville-based Lifeway Research reported Tuesday (May 9) that the SBC had 13.2 million members in 2022, down from 13.68 million in 2021. That loss of 457,371 members is the largest in more than a century, according to the Annual Church Profile compiled by Lifeway.

Once a denomination of 16.3 million, the SBC has declined by 1.5 million members since 2018, and by more than 3 million members since 2006. The COVID-19 pandemic played a role in the downturn, as did the reality that as older members die off, there are fewer young people to replace them. [Religion News]

This, no doubt, contributed to the decline:

[Delegates] at the [annual] meeting [in June] will also discuss the role of women in church leadership. Earlier this year, the SBC’s Executive Committee voted to expel several churches for having women pastors, including Saddleback Church, a California megachurch and one of the denomination’s largest congregations, for having women pastors. Saddleback is expected to appeal that decision.

But is this a theological dispute, an arbitrary display of power – or a concern that women leaders would be more likely to interfere with the general leadership inclination towards loyalty to former President Trump, who has been accused of, and even admitted to, sexual improprieties?

The Quality Of The Paranormal

From the San Antonio Current:

With its Ghost Tracks, Donkey Lady and haunted hotels, San Antonio is home to an array of eerie places and urban legends, which may explain why it was recently ranked one of the nation’s most paranormal cities.

The Alamo City landed at No. 7 in a report published on Monday by online lawn-care service provider Lawn Love that purports to rank U.S. cities by their paranormal happenings.

Yep, a lawn care company. Kinda sad, except it’s the paranormal, so I laugh, instead. OK, chuckle.

Belated Movie Reviews

Having lost his true love, here is Neo on a blind date. At a prom. She’s not charmed.

The Matrix Resurrections (2021) is self-indulgent in so many ways: nods to the audience and how it reacted to the first three movies; guns; magic masquerading as cool tech; self-doubt; progress in artificial intelligence; and, no doubt, several other topics I missed.

But, in case you’ve seen it and wondered, I deliberately omit gaming. Those gestures were weak and ineffective.

All to occult a love story.

And that’s about it. My Arts Editor had two comments: “His acting is so wooden”, and “The Easter Egg is the best part of the movie.” I might add that the CGI seemed faultless, and Thomas Anderson as a scruffy old dude had me sniggering.

But I concur with my Arts Editor. If you’re a Neal Patrick Harris completist, or, yes, a Keanu Reeves completist, then you have to see this. But I suggest you pre-grit your teeth.