Is It Crisis Or Just A Hiccup?

Lawfare‘s Benjamin Wittes and Susan Hennessey checked their email bag – and came up with a doozy:

We received this morning an extraordinary message from a group of Foreign Service officers. …

Writing for a small group of three other colleagues, this individual begins by noting Lawfare’s prior “advice for civil servants about the ethics of service under the Trump administration” and goes on to seek out ethical advice about how to best handle certain specific concerns facing Foreign Service officers. Namely, this group is worried that the rollout of the executive order on immigration—both the initial order and the forthcoming substitution—is taking place without consideration of important, available data.

Turns out that the Foreign Service officers are worried that these Executive Orders are being crafted without regard to, ummm, the facts, which are available in a variety of government databases, but are apparently not being consulted. Benjamin and Susan’s observation?

There’s a lot to talk about with regard to the specific questions above, but it is worth pausing to note as an initial matter the mere fact that a group of junior Foreign Service officers is currently put in the position wherein they are even contemplating whether they have an obligation to reinforce the interagency process with respect to the Justice Department. This fact reflects the the [sic] failure so far of the actual interagency process to function—and the failure of the White House to conduct interagency consultation processes with even minimal integrity.

Amateur hour has turned into, what, amateur month?

And not to leave you on tenterhooks, they advised the Foreign Service officers that it’s the responsibility of the Administration to seek out facts. To summarize their lengthy reply, the Foreign Service officers are not obligated to jam the important facts up Bannon’s ass. It’s his responsibility, as an adult, to seek out all relevant facts before writing Executive Orders.

The impression you get is of a group that’s trying to run a government without planning, just by following some ideological principles IF you’re an aide, and if your Trump it’s just the flavor of the day, while trying to keep those campaign promises that are perceived as being important. By contrast, you can be certain that Clinton would have had respectable, capable people ready to go, plans in place for implementing important policies, and we’d continue to be the leader of the world.

Not its stand-up comedian.

I Don’t Need To Be Scooped Up By This, Ctd

A reader writes about flying reptiles:

The vestigial wings are curious. This thing surely can’t fly or even glide.

According to the first post on Azhdarchid Paleobiology from 2008:

Pterosaurs are flying reptiles that lived during the age of the dinosaurs (between about 230 and 65 million years ago). Although often called dinosaurs, they are not part of this group and represent a distinct lineage of reptiles that evolved flight independently of birds and bats. There are around 100 species of pterosaurs currently known, and one group – including about nine species – is particularly controversial. These are the azhdarchids, a group named after the Uzbek word for ‘dragon’ [image above shows a giant azhdarchid in flight].

With massive, elongate heads, very long, stiff necks, long hindlimbs, and often gigantic size, azhdarchids are more than deserving of their ‘dragon’ title. Azhdarchids include the largest of all pterosaurs: some had wingspans exceeding 10 m and, when standing, had shoulder heights of over 2.5 m …

I’m having trouble mapping vestigial to wingspans in excess of 10 meters. Then again, just the thought of something that large, flapping about, scooping up stray people … reminds me of The Giant Claw (1957).

Getting The Lead Out, Ctd

A reader comments on Kevin Drum’s lead theory:

I hadn’t known about the perfect mapping of the British curve differences. And it alludes to similar results in other countries. I think the conclusion is pretty irrefutable at this point: leaded gasoline caused fetal harm to the extent that a more numerous cohort of adults faced difficulties dealing with life and committed more crimes. It’s not the sole cause; society is a complex system and there are never simple or single answers. But it certainly appears to a be a major one.

Neither Is Satisfactory

I ran across this coverage of Justice Alito keynote speech at the Claremont Institute’s 2017 annual dinner in Slate by Mark Joseph Stern, and was appalled by both Alito’s off-the-cuff definition of pollution and the EPA‘s. First, Stern’s report on Alito:

The second was Massachusetts v. EPA. In that case, the Supreme Court found that carbon dioxide is a “pollutant” within the scope of the Clean Air Act, allowing the EPA to regulate it. Alito dissented from the 5–4 decision. And in his speech on Saturday, he summarized his frustration with the majority opinion:

Now, what is a pollutant? A pollutant is a subject that is harmful to human beings or to animals or to plants. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Carbon dioxide is not harmful to ordinary things, to human beings, or to animals, or to plants. It’s actually needed for plant growth. All of us are exhaling carbon dioxide right now. So, if it’s a pollutant, we’re all polluting. When Congress authorized the regulation of pollutants, what it had in mind were substances like sulfur dioxide, or particulate matter—basically, soot or smoke in the air. Congress was not thinking about carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases.

Alito’s comments here are straight out of the climate change denialist playbook—and were rejected in Massachusetts v. EPA, for good reason.

Alito’s definition of pollutant brings tears to my eyes. Let’s go way back to the beginning – not the definition of pollution, but before that: The purpose of the EPA, which I’m going to simply take literally as the protection of the environment. But even before we can really define the EPA, we need to understand that protection is a polymorphic word, by which I mean its meaning is dependent on its context or viewpoint. A beaver has a different use of the environment than we might. The solar system is probably unaffected, on the whole, by our environmental status.

But humans, ah, yes. We human wrangle a lot about the value of the environment, but undeniably our well-being is currently dependent on the health of the environment. Now, parts of the environment are malignant towards us: some viruses and bacterial are harmful, and arsenic in well water causes illness and death. Those specific pathogens certainly fit nicely into Alito’s definition. But there’s more.

I think it goes without saying that the atmosphere is part of the EPA‘s remit, and thus we should consider it. Alito may want to limit it to this ill-defined pollution, but it’s not. We’re talking environment here, and so let’s take this a bit further into precision land – when we talk about atmosphere and protection from a human viewpoint, we’re really talking about an optimally balanced mixture of gases. This assertion is easily defended by pushing Alito into a hyperbaric chamber and then reversing its purpose by removing the oxygen from the chamber and replacing it with carbon dioxide. About the time he’s collapsing from oxygen deprivation, as are most other oxygen consuming creatures we may have put in there as company for Alito, he should have become aware that there’s more to environmental protection than simply removing quasi-pollutants. His definition, informal as it might be, does not admit to limitations, to the bell curve we often see when plotting survivability against existence or consumption. One more illuminatory definition, if the reader doesn’t mind? Water’s a good thing, right? My doctors are always telling me to drink more water. But there’s a limit. You can die of too much water. It’s called water intoxication. Too much, too little, you die before your time. But within a certain range, water intake is good for you. This applies to many substances that are good for you.

Because we’re talking about the Environmental Protection (for the sake of humans) Agency, I think it’s apparent that the EPA isn’t limited to the existence of unusual substances in the atmosphere – it must be concerned with the dangers of mixtures of gases which are not conducive to the efficient functioning of the human organism as well as the other organisms which, in part, make up the environment. Without those organisms, we, too, would perish and enter the category of extinction. So, to finish up the last loose end here, I am not advocating that we ask if there is so much carbon dioxide that we’re about to pass out, but to also recognize that the heating of the atmosphere brought on by carbon dioxide (and other gases, the proportion fo which in our atmosphere is growing out of historical values) is also a grave danger to us, and thus is an environmental danger.

Now we come to the the Clean Air Act, as well as a SCOTUS decision, as also reported by Mr. Stern:

The Clean Air Act defines “air pollutant” as “any air pollution agent or combination of such agents, including any physical [or] chemical … substance or matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air” and “may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.” In its decision, the Supreme Court correctly recognized that carbon is a “chemical substance or matter” that is “emitted into” the air and “endanger[s] public health” by contributing to rising global temperatures. There is no textual support for Alito’s assertion that the law was meant to be limited to “soot or smoke.”

But it’s still terribly unsatisfactory. Alito’s complaint may be based more on the unsatisfactory phrasing of the Clean Air Act than on any particular ideological position (as Stern suggests). I would suggest ridding us of the exactly wrong use of “air pollutant” and replacing it with “ascertaining and defending an optimal mixture of gases and other atmospheric particles in the interests of optimizing the health of humans and other animals that use the atmosphere for pursuing their particular interests.” And such a rephrasing should acquire bipartisan support, as environmentalists should find this to be a better law; big business, unless it’s a big polluter, should value healthy workers; and the Christians who still dominate the United States should take that as a positive contribution to their Biblical stewardship duties – unless they believe stewardship is just another word for raping the resources of the land, as I’m told some do. Former Secretary of the Interior James Watt comes to mind as I consider the thought.

So, feeling much better now.

Attack Of The Wee Working Dogs

Apparently you have to watch out for the little guys, as Ben Caspit notes in passing in AL Monitor:

A mysterious aircraft eliminated a terrorist squad that included five Islamic State (IS) fighters just as they prepared to fire rockets from the Sinai Peninsula at Israel’s southernmost city, Eilat, Feb. 19. The Sinai affiliate of IS later issued a statement placing responsibility for the action against the squad squarely on Israel.

While Israel has a long-established policy of ignoring questions about such incidents, in this case Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman announced, “Like always, the special forces of Lichtenstein probably took out a few terrorists from Daesh [IS] in Sinai. … We do not let anything go without a response. I don’t think that the Islamic State in the Sinai Peninsula poses a serious threat.”

For those of us who don’t keep up with foreign affairs, Liechtenstein‘s population is around 38,000, but there are also a few towns and villages named Lichtenstein.

Not Missing A Bet

This perhaps obscure 4th Circuit Appeals court loss for the GOP I found interesting as a reflection of their strategy of straight ticket voting – a strategy which I’ve discussed before and have concluded that it is damaging to the American polity. From the Richmond Times-Dispatch:

A federal appeals court has dismissed a challenge to a Virginia law prohibiting partisan labels on ballots in local elections.

In an opinion published Tuesday, the Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the case brought by a group of Powhatan County Republicans and found the state has a legitimate interest in minimizing political partisanship in local races.

“While party identifiers do not appear on the official ballot for Virginia’s local candidates, the candidates still have every other avenue by which to inform voters of this information,” Judge Paul Niemeyer wrote in the three-judge panel’s unanimous opinion affirming a lower court’s earlier ruling. “Political parties and their nominees are entirely free to publicize their association with each other.”

The plaintiffs argued the ballot rules serve little real purpose because, in many cases, local races are nonpartisan in name only and nothing in state law prevents political parties from nominating local candidates or making informal endorsements. The lack of party information on the ballot, they argued, only sows confusion.

The plaintiffs, the Powhatan County Republican Committee and four candidates it endorsed in a 2015 Board of Supervisors election, claimed the ballot rule violates constitutional rights to freedom of association and equal protection.

By making the party affiliations apparent, this reminds forgetful GOP voters not of the identity of the GOP endorsed candidates – but that they’re supposed to be voting single ticket, rather than actually employing their critical faculties concerning the candidates themselves. Another tool in the box of tactics for the GOP which benefits them, but damages the nation as it makes it easier for gross incompetents to win elections and start wielding power.

To be perfectly clear, a competent, moderate Republican is just fine with me. I might vote for such a candidate, particularly if the opposition candidates strike me as incompetent, lustful for power, or have some other hidden agenda. But the straight ticket voting stratagem is a morally bankrupt notion, an assertion which has been brutally illustrated by the incompetence and ideological extremism we’re seeing in the current Administration in just the first month; I shudder at how much more down the rabbit hole they’re going to go before either Trump figures out his “legacy” won’t be something to relish – or the GOP impeaches and convicts him.

For the theoretical (a word I use loosely) discussion of the moral bankruptcy of straight ticket voting, click here.

Basic Illogic 101


Seeing the above on Facebook (from PBS) reminded me of a story I was listening to on NPR this morning – Big Business is having a grudge match in the Texas Legislature, their opponent being religious conservatives. The issue? The above. Business – especially those in Houston, hosting an upcoming event (NCAA basketball, maybe?) – are concerned that overturning the transgender bathroom law will cost millions of dollars as events and businesses pull out.

Religious conservatives are afraid that men will dress in girly clothes and traipse into the women’s restrooms and rape the 9 year olds they find in there.

I’m sure you’ve all heard that explanation before, but I am compelled to say, I KID YOU NOT.

You boys in Texas, you need to think hard about this: No Rapist Is Held Back By A Lack Of Girly Clothes. In fact, we can assume that restrooms, particularly in busy venues, are simply not good for rape. Tragically, it happens – but permitting the transgender to use the one that makes them comfortable isn’t going to lead to mass rapes.

It seems the problem here is that the conservatives chose to take control of the argument, and no one challenged them where it hurts – in the illogic of their base argument. It’s pathetic that is the best they can do, and that so many people listen to it. No doubt it’s because everyone hears R A P E and stop reading. And thinking.

So everyone, THINK. Transgender bathrooms, involving as few people as they do, are a truly trivial issue. The question for religious conservatives is What makes you afraid of doing the right damn thing? ‘cuz it sure isn’t rape concerns. That’s just damn silly.

Word of the Day

Pareidolia:

The ability to see pictures in random forms – as in clouds, tea leaves, and inkblots – is known as pareidolia; the images themselves are called simulacra. Some publicized examples I have made pilgrimages to to [sic] examine include the face of Jesus in the skillet burns of a tortilla; … [“Investigative Files“, Joe Nickell, Skeptical Inquirer (March/April 2017, not online)]

You see pareidolia used relatively frequently in SI.

The Fist Is Not Educated, Ctd

Echoing my thoughts of yesterday, Mustafa Akyol in AL Monitor connects the fearful collapse of a satirical magazine to the collapse of Turkey into a second-rate power:

In short, a Moses cartoon brought about the demise of a satirical magazine [Girgir] even without a political or legal decision having been made. Was this the intention of everyone who condemned the cartoon? Not really. Molinas, a Turkish Jewish businessman who also is editor-in-chief and a writer for Shalom, told Al-Monitor, “The cartoon went beyond the freedom of expression and no wonder its artist made a strong self-criticism.” However, he added, “The closure of Girgir is very saddening for Turkey’s satirical culture.”

What is also sad is that Turkey, once again, is heading toward being a closed society where a dominant point of view intimidates and silences whatever it finds disrespectful. Even mild satires about Ottoman history can be banned — as happened recently to a new film by a prominent actor/director. Religious conservatives now think that they own the state, and they seem quite willing to use it to suppress any form of speech they dislike.

Little do they realize that the more closed a society is, the less dynamic, creative and intelligent it becomes. Little do they realize, in other words, that if they go down this road, Turkey will not become the great power that they dream of. It will become a dull, monotonous and parochial nation producing not much other than mediocrity and conformity.

Not that the leader will admit to it, of course. In his eyes the State will be exalted and first-class.

Because of himself, of course.

Visual Immigration

A friend sent me this animated map by Metrocosm of immigration to America over the centuries. Here’s a snapshot:

Snapshot of US Immigration, 1899, from Metrocosm.

Fascinating data viewer, which I’ve only looked at briefly. They appear to have some other animated maps, which I have not yet examined.

But what I want to know is, why are all the immigrants going to Omaha? More seriously, they could have shown the most popular ports of entry for each year, although I suppose that would been New York and Los Angeles.

Iranian Politics, Ctd

Former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran is supposedly out of the race for President of Iran, but that apparently doesn’t mean he can’t meddle via the candidacy of one of his aides – in revenge on the conservatives who once supported him. Rohollah Faghihi reports in AL Monitor:

During his second term (2009-13), Ahmadinejad repeatedly appointed figures and adopted policies that were considered to be against the views of the supreme leader. As such, conservatives who were once supporters of Ahmadinejad turned against him and labeled his entourage — and especially his senior aide Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei — as the “deviation current.” Indeed, conservatives demanded the dismissal of Mashaei, who was believed to have “deviated the thoughts of Islam,” but Ahmadinejad strongly resisted these calls, saying, “Mashaei means Ahmadinejad, and Ahmadinejad means Mashaei.” …

It is believed that [Ahmadinejad aide] Baghaei’s candidacy is Ahmadinejad’s plan to take revenge on his former friends in the conservative camp by splitting their vote.

Apparently Baghaei’s candidacy is given little chance to succeed, but this was true of the Ahmadinejad run in 2005 as well – and he won. On the other hand, accusations of election rigging are not uncommon, and even credible, so Baghaei’s results may depend more on who he knows than his appeal to voters. Iranian conservatives – particularly leaders – will need to read the tea leaves with great care, otherwise if Baghaei does win, they will face a bitter victory, as they’d risk being shut out of power.

Auburn vs ‘Bama

Alabama may see a political novice on the ballot for Governor at the next election, and here’s CBS Sport‘s (that’s right) Dennis Dodd to tell you about Tommy Tuberville, former coach of Auburn. The fun part? It’s all about who you root for:

Celebrities, actors, athletes and — of course — reality show hosts have already won office seats at state and national levels. Few have experience dipping their toes into the roiling waters of Alabama politics where the conversation starts with one basic question: Who ya pullin’ for?

Another Alabaman’s perception of you depends on the answer: Bama or Auburn.

So you can see why a Tuberville candidacy would be so divisive, uniting, inspiring, perspiring — anything but boring. For 10 of his 21 years as a head coach, Tubs had his greatest success leading the Tigers to an 85-40 record and an SEC title….

Fifty-eight percent of the state’s elected officials are Republican. It’s no secret the majority of state’s fans support Alabama.

“If you can connect with voters on an education message, that’s a big plus,” French said. “Tommy has recruited. He’s seen underprivileged youth come into his program and go out the other door and be a successful professional the rest of their life.

“Those are powerful messages. It’d be fun to package him, to be honest. I might want to dust off my credentials and go with him.”

Sounds like it might be a fun campaign. Would he be like former Governor Ventura and take it very seriously and honestly? I still remember ol’ Jesse saying, “I don’t know, but I’ll hire the best expert in the field to answer that question.” His simple honesty about not knowing everything, contrasted with the highly doctrinaire answers of the other two candidates (Coleman and Humphrey), won it for him. The relative lack of ideology was quite entrancing. His rough edges were less so.

Belated Movie Reviews

She should be muttering “dickheads!” under her breath.

The Civil War movie Belle Starr (1941) is a mediocre tale of the real-life Belle Starr. Portrayed here as a Southern belle of Missouri, dispossessed of her home by a childhood friend who joined the Yankees, this story ignores a number of problems, such as the fact she still have slaves after the Civil War has finished, that her slaves would much rather stay with her than enjoy freedom, and, frankly, she’s a spoiled brat with a vision of southern culture quite at odds with the fact that it was built on the backs of slaves.

She’s a fire-breathing, bullet-spitting bride of Sam Starr, the leader of the post-Civil War rebels in Missouri, but when their Army starts abusing the loyal southerners, she’s had quite enough, only to fall prey to a bounty-hunter.

There’s little to like here, although the cinematography is nice. Characters make idiotic decisions, embrace causes divorced from justice, and mouth dialog that can be a trifle clumsy. They don’t even kiss very well.

Sort of like real life.

But, unless you really are devoted to Randolph Scott or Gene Tierney, or absolutely have to see all the movies made with a character named Blue Duck in them, don’t waste your time with this clunker.

Word of the Day

Moiety:

“The Pueblo leaders were proselytizing in the aftermath of the Revolt, trying to convince people that after kicking out Spanish authority, they needed to live by the laws of the ancestors,” says Preucel. “So they left the mission villages, which were polluted, and built these mesa-top villages.” Hanat Kotyiti, with six-foot-high walls, was organized around two plazas with underground chambers known as kivas, an ancient arrangement with strong ties to the dual social structure that existed in many Pueblo societies before the arrival of the Spanish. Even today, Cochiti is organized into Pumpkin and Turquoise paternal lineages, known as moieties. [“The First American Revolution“, Archaeology (March/April, 2017)]

Also noted in Citizen of the Galaxy, by Robert Heinlein.

This Could Be An Unpleasant Job

Bob Bauer addresses the situation of White House Counsel McGahn in the Trump Administration on Lawfare:

On this front, McGahn faces an extraordinary challenge. The President has concluded with the advice of other, private counsel that he can retain an interest in his global and national business interests, turning it over during his presidency to the management of his own children. Other lawyers have been recruited to act as ethics and compliance advisers to the business, but the White House Counsel is responsible for seeing that the arrangement set up to meet ethics standards holds together within the White House. McGahn apparently has concluded that he can function as Counsel within this controversial structure.

If he does, however, then the standards for addressing ethics issues are necessarily heightened, with implications for the steps that McGahn takes to enforce compliance. Compliance is a key White House Counsel function, still more so on these issues in this administration. Moreover, government ethics rules are meant in significant measure to reassure the public that the government is running for its benefit, not for the officeholders or their friends and family, with the result that the “appearance” of compliance, while tricky to interpret and administer, is also of high importance.

Hopefully McGahn understands the dangers of working with this amateur high wire act. Mr. Bauer expresses a lot of concern for McGahn in this White House, and helpfully lays out the responsibilities and pitfalls White House Counsels face in general.

Trappist One

This was exciting to see on CNN today:

Astronomers have found at least seven Earth-sized planets orbiting the same star 40 light-years away, according to a study published Wednesday in the journal Nature. The findings were also announced at a news conference at NASA Headquarters in Washington.

This discovery outside of our solar system is rare because the planets have the winning combination of being similar in size to Earth and being all temperate, meaning they could have water on their surfaces and potentially support life.

The star? “… an ultracool dwarf star called TRAPPIST-1.” And a friend points out that there’s now a web site dedicated to that star here. For a comparison of our star to Trappist-1:

They promise to keep the site up to date. About all I can add is that this inevitably reminds me of the background of The Demon Princes novels by Jack Vance. Part of the human species is now hosted on the 26 planets of The Concourse, all in orbit around Rigel. It always seemed so unlikely to me; now it appears that it may not be impossible.

Cool.

The Fist Is Not Educated

It’s unusual to see something this symbolic, and it’s rather tragic for Turkey. Sibel Hurtas of AL Monitor reports on Turkey apparently deciding that the future isn’t all that important:

On Feb. 10, a big demonstration was called on the university’s campus in the capital’s Cebeci district, which houses the faculty of political sciences and several other faculties. This time, riot police greeted the expelled academics and their supporters, using dogs and pepper gas to disperse the crowd. Some academics were manhandled and dragged on the ground. But the most memorable moment was perhaps when the police trod under their boots the black gowns the academics had laid down in protest.

Commenting on the episode, Albayrak said, “Nothing could have illustrated better how we are faced with a government that cares nothing about students and universities and takes interest in education only in terms of controlling it. By blocking our entry to the campus and treading on the gowns with their boots, they showed that the academia they want is not only an academia they can control but also one they can crush and overrun.”

Without education, especially in today’s world of challenges both natural and man-made, Turkey will have little choice but to buy solutions from other, more enlightened countries. The Turks’ fascination and support for Erdogan will leave them in a very unfortunate situation eventually. The interesting part is how Erdogan’s putative fear of Gulen, a religious leader, and his followers is the primary motivation for this anti-education drive. The nature of Gulen is not certain – Turkey claims he’s a terrorist, while non-Turks doubt it.

This Film Isn’t For Pictures

Allison Bailes on Energy Vanguard discusses a possible replacement for your air-conditioning:

The peer-reviewed journal Science this month published an article with a convoluted title, Scalable-manufactured randomized glass-polymer hybrid metamaterial for daytime radiative cooling (behind a paywall; sorry), but a simple message. The researchers have developed a material that can radiate heat away at night and during the daytime. And it does so with an impressive cooling capacity.

The photo at the top of the article shows the material, a translucent film. It’s basically a plastic film with tiny silicon dioxide spheres embedded in it. (Silicon dioxide is what quartz is made of, the main component of a lot of the world’s sand, and used to make glass.) The spheres play a critical role in tuning the material to emit infrared radiation while not absorbing any of solar radiation that hits the material during the daytime. The paper goes into the the physics, including a discussion of phonon-enhanced Fröhlich resonances of the microspheres and extinction cross-sections, but I’ll let you read you that those details if you choose. …

What could turn out to be a really exciting discovery for the building community is their measured cooling capacity. They set up the film outdoors and measured how much heat it could radiate to the open sky. They used an electric heater to pump heat into the film and adjusted the rate to keep the film at the same temperature as the surrounding air. By adding just enough heat to keep the temperatures equal, the researchers say the “total radiative cooling power is therefore the same as the heating power generated by the electric heater.”

Interesting – and I’d love to stop hearing the air conditioning humming along.

That Darn Climate Change Conspiracy, Ctd

As climate change continues to disrupt agriculture, another industry may be in trouble – supermarkets. Katherine Martinko on Treehugger.com looks forward to the failure of supermarkets:

Supermarkets have got it all wrong. The model on which they operate, offering a vast selection of fresh fruits and vegetables imported from distant places year-round, is simply unsustainable. It depends on great quantities of fossil fuels to heat greenhouses and to fly or truck long distances, and precious resources like fresh water, often taken from places that don’t have much water to begin with.

The precariousness of this model became apparent earlier this winter, when the UK experienced shortages of lettuce, zucchini, spinach, and other green vegetables. Because of severe flooding in Spain, these foods were not available to import. Suddenly UK supermarkets were scrambling to fly produce across the Atlantic, all the way from California, at a tremendous financial loss to themselves. Why? To maintain the status quo, to stock shelves the ‘usual’ way, because shoppers have come to expect iceberg lettuce in January.

And given how migrant labor is important to the export of foodstuffs, Trump may be another nail in the coffin:

Closer to home, in America, it is difficult to imagine how the agricultural system will work without the assistance of the migrant workers that the new president is so eager to repatriate. It seems unlikely that a great number of Americans will want to take over those back-breaking, low-paying jobs.

A beekeeper-hobbyist friend of mine was recently telling me that the professionals send all their bees to California in the spring for a mass fertilization of the crops – and this results in the inadvertent transmission of bee-specific diseases all over the country when the bees are returned to their keepers. (As a hobbyist, he doesn’t participate, but suspects that soon hobbyists will be asked to send their bees as well.) I wonder if the collapse of the supermarket system – if it ever happened – would be beneficial to bees as well, since food growing might then devolve back to greater local control.

This Is Why Religion Was Considered Dangerous By The Founding Fathers

Via snopes:

I think, somehow, the Lord’s plan is being put in place for America and these people are not only revolting against Trump, they’re revolting against what God’s plan is for America. [Pat Robertson on a broadcast of the 700 Club.]

People wonder why churches must not endorse political candidates or lose their tax-free status? It’s because of the apocalyptic pronouncements from prominent clerics. This is little less than a call to arms for Trump, backed by the word of God. For those who are enveloped in such a belief system, it may seem wonderful; for the rest of us, atheists or not, it’s a threat, a chance to be burned at the stake. And that’s not hyperbole; just read English history, starting with King Henry. Which sect is right, which is wrong?

You can’t tell.

And that’s why the Founding Fathers, in their wisdom, refused to favor any religion. And the Johnson Amendment helps guarantee that wisdom.

Power, Prestige and Profit: The Wells Fargo Debacle, Ctd

The wake of the Stumpf debacle has not smoothed over yet, as four Wells Fargo executives have been fired, and their bonuses clawed back. WaPo reports:

The four executives are current or former senior managers of the megabank’s community banking division. They will not receive their 2016 bonuses and will forfeit the stock and stock options they were awarded, Wells Fargo said in a statement.

The terminations are just the latest effort by the San Francisco-based bank to move beyond a scandal that has already led to the departure of longtime chief executive and chairman John G. Stumpf. The over-100-year-old bank has been battered by lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle for a five-year scheme in which thousands of employees, to meet aggressive sales goals, set up sham accounts that customers didn’t request. Wells Fargo admitted that it fired 5,300 employees for the conduct and has eliminated the aggressive goals that some have said drove the behavior.

But the bank has seen the number of customers signing up for new accounts tumble and it continues to face pressure from lawmakers who say the bank needs to do more to rectify the matter. It is unclear whether the board’s unanimous decision to fire four executives will be enough to quiet Wells Fargo’s critics.

It’s not entirely clear to me how important the general consumer business is to Wells Fargo, nor how news of the firings will shine up their image. Perhaps they should consider actually holding discussions on what makes for a responsible banking institution.

Maybe they should start with my Arts Editor’s opinion.

Getting The Lead Out, Ctd

Kevin Drum continues down the leaded gasoline path, this time hybridizing it with the Muslim travel ban, version 2:

But here’s the funny thing: Gorka might well be right but for entirely the wrong reasons. Young men who live in a wide swath of the world stretching from North Africa to Central Asia probably are more prone to violence than they are in the developed North. But it has nothing to do with Islam. That’s just the handiest thing to latch onto. It’s all about lead:

The Trumpies got struck down for temporarily banning immigration from a set of seven seemingly arbitrary countries, so instead they should create a rule that temporarily bans immigration from any country that phased out leaded gasoline later than, say, 2001. They might have to fiddle a bit with the numbers, which they have plenty of experience doing, and maybe add some weird second condition in order to get only the countries they want, but with a little creativity they could make it work. And it’s not based on ethnicity, religion, or even nationality. You’re welcome!

Don’t give them ideas. And don’t think this is a trap – the Trump Administration doesn’t seem to comprehend the meaning of the word contradiction. They just sail right through without embarrassment. Thus all the fantasized massacres. In the meantime, Trump’s approval remains embarrassingly high – embarrassingly high for the United States, that is.

I suppose Russia finds his performance a bit frustrating. The Chinese? They’re still gnashing their teeth at the apparent failure of their little ploy.

There’s A Lot Of Ways To Put That Roof Over Your Head

I’d never heard of vernacular architecture, but here it is, from Ariana Zilliacus on ArchDaily:

Vernacular architecture can be said to be ‘the architectural language of the people’ with its ethnic, regional and local ‘dialects,'” writes Paul Oliver, author of The Encyclopaedia of Vernacular Architecture of The World’. Unfortunately, there has been a growing disregard for traditional architectural language around the world due to modern building technology quickly spreading a “loss of identity and cultural vibrancy” through what the Architectural Review recently described as “a global pandemic of generic buildings.” People have come to see steel, concrete and glass as architecture of high quality, whereas a lot of vernacular methods including adobe, reed or peat moss are often associated with underdevelopment. Ironically, these local methods are far more sustainable and contextually aware than much contemporary architecture seen today, despite ongoing talks and debates about the importance of sustainability. As a result of these trends, a tremendous amount of architectural and cultural knowledge is being lost.

I’m sort of interested in more detail on why Ariana thinks vernacular architecture is more sustainable than modern architecture – that strikes me as an argument that requires a lot of support, given that many of the examples she cites later in her article were not developed in a context of high population densities – or simply high populations. For example, this:

Found in what is possibly the wettest human-inhabited place on earth, during monsoon season in Meghalaya the rivers grow to become far more violent and powerful than in the dry season. To cross, the Khasi tribes that lived in the region would build bamboo bridges, however they were not strong enough to last the monsoon. Around 180 years ago they experimented with a new technique, pulling the roots of a rubber tree across a river the slowly grew into a bridge that is now capable of sustaining the weight of 50 people. The living root bridges of Meghalaya take around 25-30 years to grow, and they only grow stronger with time. There are a few living bridges that have had enough time to grow into fully functioning structures, but over the last 25 years this practice has begun to die out. Waiting decades for a bridge to form is far too long in our modern day world, especially when a steel or concrete alternative can be constructed in a fraction of that time—although they certainly aren’t as magical.

That said, the many solutions to the problem of housing in the face of limited resources are fascinating, as are the stories that accompany them.

 On the island of Læsø in northern Denmark there is a longstanding tradition for seaweed roofs, made using eelgrass. A successful salt industry on the island meant that most of the trees were used to power kilns for salt refinement, leaving residents with little to construct their homes. As a result, they used driftwood from shipwrecks and eelgrass from the ocean that were able to withstand decay for hundreds of years, thanks to the fact that they were impregnated with saltwater. Unfortunately a fungal disease wiped out over 200 of the existing buildings in the 1930s, leaving only 19.

Sort of like black mold, maybe.