Transforming A Tool Into A Punishment

Erick Erickson is confusing tools with punishments:

Only the House Freedom Caucus has the will to reform entitlements. Entitlements are weighing down the country and pushing us off the fiscal cliff. The “big beautiful bill” does not reform entitlements enough, does not close the deficit, and grows the national debt further.

This is not sustainable. At some point, bond investors will give up on the American economy. In the worst-case scenario, they’ll stop buying leaving the government without an influx of cash. In the less worst scenario, they’ll demand much higher yields, which will suck up more tax revenue and expedite the debt spiral of doom.

Without massive reforms, all our taxes will go up and our economy will shrink. In the meantime, our costs of doing business will go up, including higher mortgage costs, etc.

I’m not entirely sure that he understands this, or is just so foursquare against taxes that he blindly afflicts the citizenry with hammer blows and saw blades under the assumption that taxes are punishments.

A lot of people think – as a shortcut, perhaps – of taxation as confiscatory. It’s not. It’s your contribution to improving society where the free markets are inefficient, or even inoperative. To do something that the free markets won’t doesn’t mean it’s a waste of time or money. Consider the campaign to land on the Moon. Was it worth it? Yes – not because of what we found, but from the technologies we developed to get there. Tomes have been written detailing all the lovely things we developed to support the endeavour, from physics to dental drills.

Back on point, railing about taxes is reflective of this key misunderstanding about their purpose. If we need to boost taxes to cover debts incurred by foolish politicians, regardless of their Party affiliation, then lets do it, learn from our mistakes, and get on with the business of governing the United States.

Eh?

Your Clothing Keeps Attracting Fish

My Arts Editor directed me to this:

AlgiKnit is the New York-based biomaterials research group that researches biomaterials derived from kelp, a rapidly reproducing organism that is readily and abundantly available. The team creates their material using a biopolymer derived from kelp and then transforms it into bioyarn through an extrusion process. This process allows the creation of a monofilament comparable to a traditional yarn, which is then able to be knitted.

They have developed a compostable yarn from kelp which can be knit into zero-waste, fully-fashioned garments or transformed into a textile for applications in footwear. AlgiKnit was developed from the winning concept presented at the first Biodesign Challenge in 2016. The FIT team competed against renowned science institutions such as the University of Pennsylvania, New York University, and Carnegie Mellon University to name a few. The students were challenged to come up with innovative biological design ideas that could have a positive impact on the planet. [FIT]

It’s a cool thought. I wonder how long clothes made in this manner will last; my Arts Editor reports the clothes made from this process are expensive, so their lifetime matters.

A Gray, Seething Mass Of Words

Sorry, sorry, I was feeling a bit purplish and decided I had best vent the pressure before something bad happened. Now there’s Smucker’s goo all over the wall.

Provocation? This misleading mess:

An Arizona grand jury last year indicted 18 people as part of the effort to reverse Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential win in the state, including seven attorneys and aides affiliated with Donald Trump’s national campaign and 11 Arizona Republicans, including some who sought to act as presidential electors. [WaPo]

What? The Republicans are still at it?

Sure, sure, if I stare at it cross-eyed, for a period not to exceed eighteen months or so, I can see how it can work. But it’s a tertiary interpretation which, frankly, neither I nor anyone else, beyond English grammar gourmands, will wish to digest. It’s like ropy gazelle guts.

I can get those down if I really try….

Earl Landgrebe Award Nominee

It appears Rep Buddy Carter (R-GA) is trying to make up to President Trump with this proposed legislation:

 

Introduced in House (02/10/2025)

Red, White, and Blueland Act of 2025

This bill authorizes the President to enter into negotiations with the government of Denmark to purchase or otherwise acquire Greenland. The bill also renames Greenland as Red, White, and Blueland.

My bold of the last sentence. My oh my my. Yeah, I missed this, but it’s an avalanche out there. I suppose Rep Carter might have felt it’d never go anywhere, so he could put trivial nonsense into it.

Caught Me Off Balance

A study says:

The study population consisted of 11,905 individuals, and the response rate was 54% among cases (n = 1398) and 47% among controls (n = 4193). The tattoo prevalence was 21% among cases and 18% among controls. Tattooed individuals had a higher adjusted risk of overall lymphoma (IRR = 1.21; 95% CI 0.99–1.48). The risk of lymphoma was highest in individuals with less than two years between their first tattoo and the index year (IRR = 1.81; 95% CI 1.03–3.20). The risk decreased with intermediate exposure duration (three to ten years) but increased again in individuals who received their first tattoo ≥11 years before the index year (IRR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.94–1.50). We found no evidence of increasing risk with a larger area of total tattooed body surface. The risk associated with tattoo exposure seemed to be highest for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (IRR 1.30; 95% CI 0.99–1.71) and follicular lymphoma (IRR 1.29; 95% CI 0.92–1.82). [eClinicalMedicine]

Keeping in mind this is a single study with no confirmation, it’s a bit dismaying that a seemingly harmless activity such as getting a tattoo can result in cancer.

Hopefully, if confirmed, the composition of tattoo ink can be changed.

Don’t Sell At The Bottom, Ctd

Checking in on Trump Media and Technology Group Corp, stock symbol DJT:

This monthly chart shows DJT’s picked up nearly 30%, although Friday’s after-hours trading cut that gain a bit. Over the same period the NASDAQ is up nearly 18% and the S&P 500 is up nearly 13%.

News? Well, President Trump authorized creation of a strategic bitcoin reserve, which is a bit bizarre since, in an emergency, the Internet would certainly become erratic, despite its elegant design, and might even disappear. No Internet, no bitcoin. This is also true if a solar flare comparable to the Carrington Event were to occur and impact Earth – at the very least, most computer communications would go down; if of sufficient magnitude, most computers would crash irrecoverably.

And so much for bitcoin miners.

But we’d have greater problems than all the cryptocurrencies disappearing, so it’s not all that important in a direct and practical manner. It’s simply President Trump trying to advance an industry that he’s become deeply enmeshed in, and, for those of us who still believe corruption is a vast societal negative, that’s a problem. Or an opportunity, as he accumulates more and more criminal charges.

I also see the Company has reincorporated in Florida:

At the Annual Meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved the reincorporation of the Company from Delaware to Florida (the “Reincorporation”). In connection with the Reincorporation, the Company filed its Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles of Incorporation”) with the Florida Secretary of State and adopted new Bylaws (the “Bylaws”). The Reincorporation became effective as of April 30, 2025. The forms of the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws were each attached as an exhibit to the Proxy Statement. The Articles of Incorporation are filed as Exhibit 3.1 and the Bylaws are filed as Exhibit 3.2 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.

They don’t like Delaware, a traditional incorporation location because of its judicial capabilities when it comes to corporate governance? Florida is Republican?

Corporate scams are easier in Florida?

Whatever the real reason, I expect it’ll be unsavory and a segment of the American population will trust in DJT – and regret it.

But DJT’s jump in price may be due to the covert influence of those attempting to please the President for their own reasons. We live in a world where the gloriously, deliriously wealthy are jealous of each other. They compete to accumulate more wealth, more power, and more prestige, because that’s what they’ve done all their lives, and they don’t know how to change the focus of their lives to something else, such as advancing society in general. As if their wealth is independent of the society in which they live, rather than inextricably and completely dependent.

It’s a bit pathetic, really.

If we see the markets plunge again, we may or may not see DJT’s price drop even more. I’m neither a financial professional nor a clairvoyant. I’ll simply state that I won’t go anywhere near a stock which is weak enough to be manipulated, and for which the risks of manipulation are actually worth it. Predictability, the philosopher’s stone of the investor, approaches zero in these situations.

Do They Dare?

There may be a bit of an uproar over this:

President Donald Trump on Saturday said Walmart needs to stop “trying to blame tariffs” after the retail giant announced its products would become more expensive.

Walmart’s CEO said the price increases were a result of Trump’s tariffs being “too high,” particularly when it came to Chinese goods.

“We will do our best to keep our prices as low as possible. But given the magnitude of the tariffs, even at the reduced levels announced this week, we aren’t able to absorb all the pressure given the reality of narrow retail margins,” Walmart CEO Douglas McMillon said Thursday in an earnings call.

Trump responded on Saturday, posting to Truth Social that “Between Walmart and China they should, as is said ‘EAT THE TARIFFS,’ and not charge valued customers ANYTHING. I’ll be watching, and so will your customers!” [CNN/Business]

And who would take it in the rear if Walmart decides to accede to President Trump’s delusions of how economy and tariffs work?

Investors.

Regardless of whether it’s a public or a private company, I think the lion’s share of eating the tariff has to come out of profits; workers and logistics have been the target of cost reductions for decades. What does that leave?

The greedy investors.

How will the clash between President Trump, his delusions, and investors play out? It’s hard to say, but this may turn out to be just the first exchange in a long war between retailers and the President Trump-led xenophobes.

I don’t have much insight here, but it’ll be interesting to see how long President Trump can hold it together. His history suggests he may back down fairly quickly.

Get Out The Goat Entrails, Ctd

The next entry in the unfortunate story of elections since the 2024 national election – for metaphorical goats – is coming from Omaha, NB. Parts of Omaha, as I understand it, are heavily Democratic, but the 2021 regularly scheduled mayoral election, which is officially nonpartisan and features a nonpartisan primary from which the top two proceed to the general election, resulted in victory for incumbent
Jean Stothert. In fact, it was solid:

Just short of a 30 point victory for the incumbent. But in 2025? Stothert faced Democrat John Ewing just a few days ago, whose political experience consisted of winning, and keeping, the post of Douglas County Treasurer in 2007. How did his mayoral run go?

A ten point victory over a favored incumbent is hard to dismiss. Of interest is the turnout, substantially less in 2025 than in 2021. I’d interpret that to mean Independents and Republicans, disgusted with the national Republican scene, expressed themselves by staying home in numbers of around 30,000, or voting Democratic; meanwhile, Ewing’s improvement over previous defeated challenger Neary of around 12,000 is less impressive, but still worth noting.

Electoral victories are not trophies. For the Democrats, who seem little disposed to admit errors, this is an opportunity not to wave victory flags, but to convince skeptical conservatives that they can deliver sound governance and be worthy of future serious consideration, especially if the Republicans continue to nominate buffoons for national seats.

I think the Democrats need a major reform, but good luck to Mr. Ewing. We need two respectable political parties, and we have zero. His victory will push the Republicans to consider reforms, no matter how much that stings the arrogant assholes currently running the show. Hopefully, the Democrats will figure that out, too.

Future Quarters?

I need to catch up on my reading, because something Steve Benen said a couple of weeks ago is really resonating for me. It’s all about Alcatraz:

With this in mind, Trump’s directive to “rebuild” and “substantially” enlarge the prison, preparing it to house dangerous felons again, isn’t just pointless. It would also be, as The New York Times put it, “extraordinarily expensive” — even as the administration plans to cut billions of dollars from federal law enforcement.

So why make enormous investments of time and resources into renovating an unnecessary prison? Apparently because the incumbent president — himself, a convicted felon — thinks it would be cool to use this as a “symbol.”

My bold.

That’s right – President Trump’s preparing a future prison cell for himself.

I’m surprised Colbert didn’t catch that.

Word Of The Day

Wheatpasted, wheatpasting, etc:

Flyposting (also known as bill posting) is a guerrilla marketing tactic where advertising posters are put up. In the United States, these posters are also commonly referred to as wheatpaste posters because wheatpaste is often used to adhere the posters. Posters are adhered to construction site barricades, building façades and in alleyways. [Wikipedia]

Kind of cool, even without context. Noted in “Furor over Trump’s targeting of law firms heats up with court fight and ad campaign,” Ryan J. Reilly, NBC News:

“Big law, stop bending the knee,” reads a poster from the “Big Law Cowards” campaign by the liberal nonprofit group Demand Justice. The group says the ads will be wheatpasted strategically around Washington on Thursday near the locations of the firms that have reached deals with the administration. The group will also have a mobile billboard circulating with ads criticizing the firms, along with a broader digital campaign.

Attention solely focused on making money, as Big Law does, often misses the bigger context. That is, essential strategic thinking at the highest of levels can be missed. Money is all.

Dodging The Question, Ctd

In this post, I mentioned replacing the current Parties as a solution to current political dilemmas, and it appears a few other people are having the same thought. Let’s have WaPo summarize the strategy of Independent Center:

Their objective is both relatively small and, in terms of impact, potentially massive.

Rather than trying to run a third-party presidential campaign that would require billions of dollars and untold resources to get ballot access in all 50 states, they hope to win up to a handful of House races with centrist candidates who will not accept support from either major party.

In this era of such narrow margins, that might deny Republicans and Democrats the 218 votes needed for the majority and create a protracted negotiation for a coalition government.

“We’re going to that new center. So I will say that people are scared of this being a spoiler. Yes, we’re trying to wreck the system. We’re trying to disrupt the entire duopoly,” Brandon said during Thursday’s video call.

But for what do they stand?

The Independent Center is founded on the core beliefs of enhancing individual freedom and personal choice. We trust the people of our country to decide what is right and good and important. We believe that people flourish when our system of government allows them to choose what is best for themselves, their families, and their communities. And we know that our nation will succeed and thrive when we work together to achieve economic growthfiscal responsibility, and social tolerance so we can enjoy a happy, safe and prosperous future.

Looking over the balance of the agenda, it has a definite Republican tilt. For example:

♦ that individual creativity and innovation are the drivers of economic growth in our country. We embrace new technologies and innovations to advance our economy and improve our living standards. We can ensure that future generations inherit a more abundant, stronger and more secure nation.

New technologies? I hope they’re not hiding cryptocurrencies behind that expansive phrase.

Finally, the use of the phrase common-sense, as I’ve noted before, is a big red-flag when it comes from politicians. Common-sense, when applied to a nation of 300+ million, is a mythical attribute, and those spouting proposals defended by claims of common-sense should be ignored – and ejected from the profession.

Independent Center is chock-full of such claims. Here’s the title of their solutions section:

Our Common-Sense Solutions

Sorry, guys, but no. How about this, instead?

Our First Solution: We Will Not Lie To You!

That’d make me a lot happier.

Misplaced Qs

From the NBC News report of Jeanine Pirro’s nomination to the position of U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C.:

Trump made the announcement on his Truth Social, mentioning Pirro’s previous roles as a prosecutor and a judge, and said she was “currently Co-Host of The Five, one of the Highest Rated Shows on Television.”

And Fox News noted (same article):

In a statement after Trump’s announcement, a Fox News spokesperson said Pirro “has been a wonderful addition to The Five over the last three years and a longtime beloved host across FOX News Media who contributed greatly to our success throughout her 14-year tenure. We wish her all the best in her new role in Washington.”

And her own producer?

Pirro pushed conspiracy theories about voting in the aftermath of Trump’s 2020 election loss, and she came up in litigation filed by Dominion Voting Systems. Fox News tried to redact what one of Pirro’s executive producers thought about one of her post-2020 election monologues, with the producer writing, “This is completely crazy.”

And, ah, how many folks cheered at the news that she’s co-host of The Five? What does that have to do with the qualifications for being a U.S. Attorney in one of the most important district offices?

Yeah. Not much.

President Trump continues to exhibit symptoms of chronic incompetence and/or dementia, and Fox News just encourages it. Regardless of what the Democrats are doing, this is not an honorable behavior by Fox News.

The sad part is that, professionally, she may be qualified for the position, although assertions that she’s nuts by those who should know is a detractor. But don’t throw this crap about television ratings into the mix. It just makes Trump look like a lunatic. Which he is.

Word Of The Day

Perseveration:

the act of saying or doing something repeatedly when there is no longer any reason to do so:

  • Many of the errors that the children made consisted of verbal substitutions and perseverations.
  • Perseveration may be a sign that a child is on the autism spectrum. [Cambridge Dictionary]

Noted in this WaPo article title. “Carolyn Hax: 4 a.m. bathroom breaks become perseverations on life’s mistakes.

Just Him Against The World

One difference I’ve noticed between Trump I and Trump II: where’s his family? Melania’s made clear her distaste for the President, but what of the three kids, Ivanka, Eric, and Don, Jr., plus spouses, who were so salient in the first Administration, and have disappeared, more or less, from view in this second Administration?

I decline to speculate on Trump family tensions, but I cannot help but wonder if the kids foresee disaster awaiting them and Dad, and only by not being part of the Administration can they hope to avoid being mopped up by Trump’s enemies when his incompetence drags him down.

Just wonderin’.

The Grasping Galoot Just Might

CNN, along with every other media outlet in the world, is reporting the new Pope is … Robert Prevost of the United States:

Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost of the United States has been elected the 267th pope and will soon step onto the balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica as the new leader of the world’s 1.4 billion Catholics.

Prevost, 69, from Chicago, Illinois, is the first ever pope from the United States. He will be known as Leo XIV.

I think I must have a buck somewhere that says President Trump will claim credit for Prevost’s election. Sigh.

A Star Is Out

Republican star – no matter how much I don’t like his refusal to recuse back in his first run for governor against Stacey Abrams (D-GA) – and Governor Brian Kemp (R-GA) is out of the running:

Governor Brian Kemp (R) just formally announced he’s not going to run for Senate next year against Senator Jon Ossoff (D). It’s difficult to convey how big a coup this is for Democrats and how big a setback it is for Republicans for the 2026 midterms. Candidate choice is always important but seldom decisive. This is an exception. Ossoff was (and is) a favorite against everyone but Kemp. [Josh Marshall, TPM]

And it’s voluntary. I agreed with Mr Marshall, above – only Kemp could give Senator Ossoff (D-GA) a real contest, and Governor Kemp is signaling that, in a year and a half, he doesn’t think he can beat the Senator.

Now, Marshall thinks Kemp has Presidential ambitions, and he might. But getting a Senator’s seat builds momentum – but losing such a race could destroy Kemp’s chances in a Presidential race. No one likes a loser, which explains why then- and now- President Trump ran around screaming about Democratic cheating in 2020. It wasn’t just that he couldn’t accept being a loser, but it also endangered his chances of re-attaining the Presidency.

And winning back the legal sanctuary of the Presidency.

In any case, if Kemp foresees disaster in a friendly, conservative-if-purple State, well, it could make next year’s election very interesting for the balance of the Senatorial races.

Quote Of The Day, Ctd

It’s always good to see demi-gods agreeing with me. In this case it’s conservative lawyer and former Federal judge J. Michael Luttig, commenting on the same quote that drew my attention recently, wherein President Trump thinks he needs to consult brilliant lawyers to decide if his oath to uphold the Constitution really applies to him. Here’s Huffpost’s report:

Conservative former federal judge J. Michael Luttig on Monday sounded the alarm over Donald Trump’s recent remark that he doesn’t know if he is obligated to uphold the U.S. Constitution, calling it “perhaps the most important words ever spoken by a president of the United States.”

Professor Richardson adds, from an unknown source:

Conservative judge J. Michael Luttig explained to MSNBC’s Ali Velshi that far-right scholars have argued that the president does not have to follow the Supreme Court if he doesn’t agree with its decisons: he can interpret the Constitution for himself. Luttig called this “constitutional denialism.” He added that “[t]he American people deserve to know if the President does not intend to uphold the Constitution of the United States or if he intends to uphold it only when he agrees with the Supreme Court.”

I think it’s unfortunate that Judge Luttig chose the phrase [t]he American people deserve to know … it’s such a cliche that it’s rapidly become a semantic null – and a lost opportunity.

With neither pretension nor fallacy, Judge Luttig could have instead chosen a more effective phraseology, along the lines of …

If the American people are to come to a fair decision concerning the fate of President Trump, whether he should or should not be permitted to retain his office, then his views on fulfilling his oath and behaving with honor are essential information.

In my view, his views disqualify him from the seat. The House of Representatives should begin immediate impeachment proceedings.

And let Trump ally Speaker Johnson (R-LA) twist in the wind.

That’s a missed opportunity, Judge Luttig.

Word Of The Day

Catachresis:

  1. : use of the wrong word for the context
  2. : use of a forced and especially paradoxical figure of speech (such as blind mouths) [Merriam-Webster]

I’ve been running across a lot of unfamiliar words of late, although this seems a specialist word for grammarians, and I’m definitely not a grammarian. The Merriam-Webster link also discusses grammarian usages of catachresis, mostly in what appears to be a snitly way. Noted in “Your existential terror is adorable,” Rachel Manteuffel, WaPo:

Slackmoji is essentially an adorable medium. You can, as my colleague Chloe Coleman has, choose a little cartoon frog as an avatar for yourself and illustrate your feelings that way. Perhaps you feel shame.

And while you admit you feel ashamed, you’ve also cutened it up for public consumption. It’s … processed. Indirect. Ironic. Visually catachrestic. It’s like poetry.

I recall castigating someone, in email, for using an emoji. This is back in the BBS days, where it was all ASCII, not the emoji-enabling UTF-8, and so it was nothing more than :). I told them it was lazy and would never last.

I was half-right. Yes, that’s shamelessly stolen from someone giving a speech concerning X Windows at one of the UNIX conferences a long time ago. Or maybe it was the commentary.

Why The Nutty Suits?

This sounds tawdry and, in view of the Constitution, slightly nutty:

In a little-noticed lawsuit filed last week, the America First Legal Foundation sued Chief Justice John Roberts and the head of the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts.

The case ostensibly proceeds as a FOIA lawsuit, with the Trump-aligned group seeking access to judiciary records. But, in doing so, it asks the courts to cede massive power to the White House: the bodies that make court policy and manage the judiciary’s day-to-day operations should be considered independent agencies of the executive branch, the suit argues, giving the President, under the conservative legal movement’s theories, the power to appoint and dismiss people in key roles. [TPM]

This doesn’t make much sense, does it? I think what’s going on here is that an extremist right wing group that currently holds the White House wants to be rid of the Constitution, but it doesn’t just dare to declare the Constitution no longer applies. The Constitution is damn near holy writ for a large majority of the citizenry that covers a large portion of the political spectrum. Worse yet, given Republican gun control politics, that segment will be heavily armed, alarmed, and annoyed.

What’s the next best thing? Gut the Constitution. I see this lawsuit as an attempt to kill the Constitution without actually admitting they’re killing the Constitution. This is a perhaps subtle distinction from the article’s quoted experts:

These are all facets of an escalating campaign to erode the independence of the judiciary, experts told TPM. The lawsuit demonstrates another prong of it: close allies of the president are effectively asking the courts to rule that they should be managed by the White House.

Will the courts permit their self-dissolution? I’m sure at least one judge can be persuaded to agree, but I doubt SCOTUS would agree. Although Justices Alito and Thomas are alarmingly agreeable to the Trump Adminisration’s suits, there have been 9-0 decisions against Trump, and I suspect that’ll happen here.

But no doubt the reasoning is You don’t know ’til you try. This is a lawsuit to keep an eye on.

Quote Of The Day

Here’s the text as reported from WaPo:

President Donald Trump, asked during an interview on NBC News’s “Meet the Press with Kristen Welker,” whether he believes that he needs to uphold the Constitution during his presidency, responded, “I don’t know.”

Want to see the moment to evaluate for yourself? It’s at roughly the two minute mark in the interview here.

This is an automatic disqualifier. We don’t need pages and pages of subtle reasoning, do we? He swore, twice, to uphold the Constitution; he doesn’t need his “brilliant” lawyers to tell him so. He should be able to discern this himself.

Sheesh.

Word Of The Day

Floriography:

Floriography is a coded communication where each flower and color holds symbolic meaning. Stemming back thousands of years, the language of flowers reached a pinnacle of popularity in the Victorian era. Intentional flower combinations allow the giver to communicate without uttering a word. [Petal Republic]

Noted in this fashion video. Keep your eyes on the back wall.

If you can.