Belated Movie Reviews

French movie poster.
Source: Wikipedia
.

Fantastic Planet (1973; French: La Planète Sauvage) looks like something the Monty Python troupe might have created: an animated tale of humans taking the role of pets to their gigantic overlords, the Draags on the Draag home planet. The human orphan infant Terr, adopted by Draag child Tiwa, manages to survive to his teen years, and, more importantly, learns to listen in on the psychic school lessons delivered to Tiwa.

He escapes to find ‘wild’ Oms, or humans, surviving on the leavings of the Draags, It’s a rough world, but Terr is ready for it, and his knowledge is unique among the humans. His learning keeps the humans alive, no doubt a theme, as the Draags, irritated at the activities of a clearly inferior race, including having babies much more quickly than the Draags, and discovering the murder of a Draag by the humans, determine to be rid of the humans. Then it’s a race against to get off the planet.

The ending is sufficiently loony to be worthy of this sort of movie, and seemed nearly incoherent.

And it’s a lot like Monty Python’s animated bits, with no attention paid to plausibility in the midst of all the apparent whimsy, and some awfully horrible animal behaviors best not described. The animation itself fascinated my Arts Editor, ranging from sketchy, but recognizable, half-naked figures, to simple stick figures at the human massacre.

I’m not sure about enjoying this story, but it does force the audience to pay attention and do a bit of thinking. Which is more than a lot of movies today. Tellingly, we were both sure we wouldn’t make it to the end, but, despite some snarky remarks on our part, we saw it right to what we believe was the end; the print we viewed came to a very abrupt end.

An Open Letter To Disney

To: Bob Iger, CEO, Disney,
c/o Disney’s Corporate social responsibility team

Sir,

I write to remind you of an important distinction. Your position atop a storied American corporation is not a trophy to be placed on your mantlepiece. It is, instead, a position of measureless responsibility. Briefly, you are responsible for preserving and advancing the company in a sustainable manner. That includes a recognition of those elements of the society in which Disney matured that were necessary, namely democracy.

Insofar as demands from the current Administration may have influenced and encouraged a decision to suspend Mr Kimmel, I am asking that the suspension be reversed. Confirming the Administration’s worst tendencies will benefit no one in the long view, as arbitrary and capricious decisions are a hallmark of those whose tenure in power is marked by a disdain for democracy, its laws and traditions.

I reiterate: revoke Mr Kimmel’s suspension. Disney will be the better for it.

Sincerely yours,

H. A. White, Jr.

Currency Always Has Costs, Ctd

Here’s an example of a predictable risk that is much more easily executed on the crypto variety of currency:

Israel’s Ministry of Defense announced on Monday that it was ordering the seizure of 187 crypto wallets that allegedly belong to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or IRGC.

In a document detailing the seizure order, the ministry’s National Bureau for Counter Terror Financing (NBCTF) said it was “convinced that the cryptocurrency wallets” in the list are property of the IRGC and are “used for the perpetration of a severe terror crime.”

The IRGC is sanctioned as a terrorist organization by the United States, the European Union, and Israel, among other countries.  [TechCrunch]

Sure, the blockchains on which cryptocurrency is based makes claims of being distributed, but it’s not distributed like cash, now is it? It takes a lot of work to collect well-hidden cash. Crypto-wallets? The big exchanges either cooperate with the government, or they locate their servers out of the reach of said governments – and those governments’ protective elements.

There’s a reason we have governments, and it isn’t, at its best, to be parasites. They provide protection, but, at their worst, they can be extremely destructive.

And basing currency on computers just makes it more vulnerable.

Current? Movie Reviews

I giggle when my stomach is printed.

Mickey 17 (2025) explores a religious society that considers at least one life to be completely expendable. What happened to Mickeys one through sixteen?

They’re gone, dead.

He’s a specialist on a colony ship, a ship sent to another planet, analogous to the British colonization of Australia. He’s the guy that gets sent into dangerous situations, such as ship repair or exploring a cave. If he doesn’t make it, his body is reprinted and the memories from the now-dead Mickey, assuming his memory was conserved, is added to the new Mickey.

Dying still hurts, though. Perhaps worse is that he’s almost a joke in the ship, but he eventually acquires a partner willing to disregard his occasional disappearance.

But, equally fascinating, is that ship leadership is a much like a religious charismatic leadership, willing to do anything to fulfill the hole in their soul that needs adoration.

It all comes to a head when there is suddenly two Mickeys existing, a definite blasphemy that cannot be permitted, AND they discover the planet they’re set to colonize already has an intelligent population, they just didn’t recognize it immediately, If they’re not handled delicately they may wipe out the colony ship.

Meanwhile, Mickey’s partner is in ecstasy, what with two Mickeys and all.

Mickey 17‘s all rather interesting, and not at all heavy. Which may discourage some viewers, but sometimes difficult moral questions are best dealt with via humor, rather than pedanticism.

So don’t be afraid of it. The future’s dystopic in this story. Have some fun with it. We’re still human, at least for these storytellers.

Coming To The Deity Of Your Choice Moment

I’m becoming more and more convinced the issues of honesty, truth, integrity, earnestness, all wrapped up in a single word – anyone have a candidate? – is going to become the focus of a nation-wide discussion once both political parties have been kicked out of office, whether electorally or violently. Steve Benen has a convenient summation:

There’s a quote that’s often attributed to political theorist Hannah Arendt: “This constant lying is not aimed at making the people believe a lie, but at ensuring that no one believes anything anymore.” As it happens, Arendt didn’t actually say this (at least not exactly), but the quote resonates because of its salience:

Trump obviously tries to get people to believe lies all the time, but nearly as often, the president and his allies try to get people to give up on the idea that facts exist. With too many Americans, these tactics are effective, which helps explain why they’ve become so common.

This reduction in the value of truth makes for gold for the grifter, the political operative who puts success above integrity, the social influencer seeking clicks and thus an income, the online health advisor who uses carefully crafted charisma and faux-endorsements to sell quackery to the victims they never meet, for an entire host of dishonest folks more interested in wealth or prestige than in being honest.

This may seem to be a pun-intended Golden Age for the criminals, but as citizens watch relatives march off after their pied pipers, friends after Godly enticers to commit horrendous crimes against fellow citizens, parents becoming destitute, and a general societal breakdown resulting in broad hints of mass starvation and climate change, those citizens who survive stand a good chance of learning that diverging from facts on the ground can lead to disastrous consequences.

Honesty is the best policy, no? It’s going to be a rough few years, I fear.

Exactly what will happen? A lot of yelling, especially from the corporate types for whom money is all. Will we ban the Internet? As unlikely as it seems, it’s not impossible. Indeed, it’d solve a lot of problems involving security. But, again, very doubtful. Some folks think the Internet should be considered a human right. They’d be hard Nos.

But whatever it is, we’ll have to do it together, with the give and take and compromise which is the mark of adults, and not the obdurate line in the sand! that marks the ideologue, the zealot, the arrogant twerp that is the source of today’s problems.

Current Movie Reviews

Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale (2025) wraps up the story involving Lord Grantham, his wife Cora, and their upcoming retirement, while Mary must endure a stumble or two that may stop her from assuming control of the Abbey. The Great Depression has descended upon the world, and the storytellers do not make either error of omitting any damage to the family fortunes, or putting them in penury; damage there is, and that is used to teach the lesson of flexibility.

It’s well done, with fine acting, a paucity of critical information to keep anticipation florid, and a sober recognition that reality is higher up the ladder than sordid social conventions. If you’re a Downton Abbey fan, proceed directly to the start line; if not, but are interested, binge the series and previous movies first.

And enjoy the sprinkling of wry, dry humor throughout.

Word Of The Day

Groyper:

The Groypers, sometimes called the Groyper Army, are a group of alt-rightwhite nationalist, and Christian nationalist[4] activists led by Nick Fuentes. Members of the group have attempted to introduce alt-right politics into mainstream conservatism in the United States and participated in the January 6 United States Capitol attack and the protests leading up to it. They have targeted other conservative groups and individuals whose agendas they view as too moderate and insufficiently racist and nationalist. The Groyper movement has been described as white nationalist, homophobicnativistfascistsexistantisemitic, and an attempt to rebrand the declining alt-right movement. [Wikipedia]

Ya gotta wonder if declining is a wishful adjective, or is backed up by a statistic that can be examined. Noted in “Will the MAGAs admit that Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer is one of them?” Frank Vyan Walton, Daily Kos:

So, this wasn’t an attack “from the Left.”  This kid was from a White Mormon Republican family who were steeped in gun culture.  His dad was a Sheriff.  He wore an unironic Trump costume for Halloween. He wasn’t a Latino, he wasn’t a Trans person. Some indications are that he was linked to the Groyper subculture who were deeply antisemitic and hated Charlie Kirk for his staunch support of Israel.

As it happens, this guy just goes on and on and on, and not much of interest, either, although probably fairly accurate. I’ve seen groyper before, but I hadn’t look it up.

All The World’s A Stage

Augh! I’m compelled!

And all the men and women merely players

That came to mind when I learned — yes, yes, I’m well behind on my reading, maybe I’ll catch the fiendish reading monster of relative ephemera, aka news articles and blog posts, when the snow flies – that the detention center dubbed ‘Alligator Alcatraz‘, a tent city in the Florida Everglades, is being dismantled:

In July, Florida Republicans launched the brutal “Alligator Alcatraz” immigration detention center deep in the Florida Everglades with great fanfare. Soon, the Trump administration was championing it as a model it wanted to replicate across the country. But less than two months later, the camp is being dismantled and emptied of detainees. [MSNBC]

And, frankly, with nary a whisper.

As if a stage change was taking place on the stage that is the world.

Remember, President Trump’s greatest skill – I shan’t call it talent – isn’t building, branding, or governing. He reportedly made millions and millions of dollars, and built a nation-wide reputation, as an actor.

Or, as a professor long ago said of John Wayne, a performer. Although I never saw Mr Trump’s vehicle, The Apprentice, my understanding is that he did the same thing over and over and over; so the professor also said of Wayne.

But now that Mr Trump is descending into dementia, his acting skills coming to the fore to sell his daily issuance of mendacity, he seems to believe that the world is a stage, and yesterday’s big dramatic scene is for tomorrow’s disassembly, quietly accomplished to make way for the next big act.

Not the way a government should be run.

Belated Movie Reviews

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024) is the sequel to Beetlejuice (1988), the ghost story in which a young married couple goes off a bridge and end up dead, after which they discover that the dead have their own culture, including hucksters, and their own set of dangers.

But what happened to the huckster? That’s the point of this sequel, but, despite the best efforts of the actors, this movie doesn’t make the grade. Promising characters are developed and discarded, the delights of the first movie are repeated and extended to no particular end, the parts that might have charmed us fall flat, and the central mystery is clumsily handled.

It was a disappointment, at least for me, even if I did like the actor playing the arguable lead, Jenna Ortega. But your mileage may vary.

On The Precipice Of Stupid

The assassination of Charlie Kirk puts us on a precipice, I think. People think they’re justified in killing people with whom they disagree, and that endangers a political system that has produced the finest military ever.

Intolerant, arrogant assholes on both sides are trying to tear us down because of their firm belief that they’re the smart ones, or a silent God is on their side.

I did not pay attention to Mr Kirk, so I have no opinion, but, just like State Senator Hortman’s assassination, Kirk represents another step in the Structural-Demographic Theory’s disintegrative phase (same link), as arrogance and impatience with divergent opinions leads to fatal conflicts.

Professor Turchin’s work suggests that in rural societies it takes about fifty years for the adamant to realize that civil war is not a fake war, but leads to horrible deaths and a weakening of the country. Will that hold true for our technological society?

Hysteria Supreme

When a Federal judge ruled that tariffs may not be set by the President, hysteria seems to have broken out at Truth Social on the President’s account:

Without Tariffs, and all of the TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS we have already taken in, our Country would be completely destroyed, and our military power would be instantly obliterated. In a 7 to 4 Opinion, a Radical Left group of judges didn’t care, but one Democrat, Obama appointed, actually voted to save our Country. I would like to thank him for his Courage! He loves and respects the U.S.A.

Yeah, I might like to know how the loss of a few tariffs would instantly obliterate our military. Maybe he means spiritually?

No, I won’t provide a link. You can find it on your own, I feel sure.

Word Of The Day

Nonet:

  1. a group of nine performers or instruments.
  2. a composition for a nonet. [Dictionary.com]

Noted in “Former CDC directors: RFK Jr. is ‘unlike anything our country has ever experienced’,” Steve Benen, Maddowblog:

But just as notable, if not more so, is the written condemnation itself. Under a headline that read, “We Ran the C.D.C.: Kennedy Is Endangering Every American’s Health,” the nonet was unreserved in its criticisms of the anti-vaccine conspiracy theorist who is currently serving as the nation’s health secretary.

Not quite matching the definition.

Honey, That Damn Bird Came Home To Roost

Folks who are paying attention will recall, years ago just a few weeks ago, when Paramount, now owned by Skydance Media, and its legendary show Sixty Minutes, succumbed to a dubious lawsuit and agreed to pay a settlement of $16 million in response to silly accusations by President Trump.

Evidently, Skydance, et al, do not understand that bullies constantly probe for weakness, and, when detected, exploit it to the full.

When you realize Come home to roost isn’t just a quaint remark concerning bad judgment.

So this should come as no surprise:

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem accused CBS News of selectively editing footage from her Sunday interview, cutting some of her remarks about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Salvadoran national who was mistakenly deported and returned to the U.S. to face separate charges.

I anticipate a lawsuit demanding ridiculous damages, seeing as Trump’s previous lawsuit asked for $20 billion in damages, and then Skydance will be up against it, as they say.

This is what happens when you let financial considerations have priority over everything else, including questions of loyalty to political systems.

Skydance is becoming the Trump Administration’s thumb puppet, and those aren’t smooth fingernails, I’m tellin’ ya.

Belated Movie Reviews

Another sordid attempt at drowning.

Stone of Destiny (2008) is a slightly fictionalized story of a real incident. The Stone of Scone, aka Stone of Destiny, is a real thing, a Scottish boulder with associations to the Scottish monarchy.

At the time of the movie, 1950, the Stone of Scone was stored in Westminster Abbey, having been plundered and removed from its Scottish home by King Edward I of England in 1296. A young Scottish college student, Ian Hamilton, like many other young Scotsmen, hungers to return the Stone as a symbol of Scottish nationalism. Unlike most, though, he falls in with just the right mix of fellow students to actually accomplish the task: a hard drinking engineering student, a more studious and withdrawn friend of the engineer, and a young nationalist woman, who provides motivation and support.

The charm of the story is in the details of the theft, as it is with most such stories: ducking the cops, getting access to the location, obtaining the plunder, and getting out of Dodge, or London. Further, the story shows the myths of the Scottish, namely grit, persistence, and hard drinking.

But there’s also the vivid difference between a national leader, John MacCormick, who is balancing national politics, such as retaining plausible deniability even as he provides finances, and must think of the optics of being a nationalist not only to Scotland, but a wide world, and the group of students, who, despite internal rows, should have the motto Let’s get this shit done!

This is not necessarily an inspirational story. Failure did not mean death, but more likely personal embarrassment. But it’s educational and fun.

And there’s nothing wrong with that.

A Win For Writers?

yahoo!finance is reporting a victory for authors who are litigants in suits against AI companies using their books in training generative AIs:

Anthropic told a San Francisco federal judge on Friday that it has agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a class-action lawsuit from a group of authors who accused the artificial intelligence company of using their books to train its AI chatbot Claude without permission.

Anthropic and the plaintiffs in a court filing asked U.S. District Judge William Alsup to approve the settlement, after announcing the agreement in August without disclosing the terms or amount. …

The proposed deal marks the first settlement in a string of lawsuits against tech companies including OpenAIMicrosoft and Meta Platforms over their use of copyrighted material to train generative AI systems.

Successful suits in those still-open cases could bring larger prizes yet, now that a settlement produced a “mere” billion dollars, excuse me $1.5 billion, and the three companies cited are cash rich. Juries, depending on presentations by the attorneys, are often impatient with manifestly unfair situations in which a corporation is gaining riches.

This, too, is interesting…

Anthropic as part of the settlement said it will destroy downloaded copies of books the authors accused it of pirating, and under the deal it could still face infringement claims related to material produced by the company’s AI models.

They may have to erase the data produced and start again. Will their AI be as accurate as the current AIs? In any case, I’m naive on both the AI and legal fronts, but it sounds like Anthropic looked at the arguments and decided they were in a hole and it was caving in on them.

And how will investors react to this rather large penalty? This isn’t like a line of research not panning out; this is a legal blunder and may be met with fury by people who expected a big return and only get a small one.

Or nothing at all.

We’re All Citizens

CNN has a report on the National Guards’ involuntary sojourn in Washington, DC:

With each phone call home, the troops describe a mission unlike any other.

One soldier from Tennessee told his father that from 4 p.m. to 4 a.m. every day, his only task is to walk around Chinatown. Another service member from Mississippi told a loved one that she’d been repeatedly cursed at while on patrol. During a call to his wife, a guardsman from Louisiana said there was confusion about what the military was actually doing there.

“We haven’t gotten critically low on morale, but we’re falling fast,” said one soldier who, like others quoted in this story, spoke to CNN on the condition of anonymity because they’re not authorized to speak to the media and feared reprisal.

I think my fellow citizens in DC are making a mistake when they make the National Guard the enemy by yelling curses, because they are also our fellow citizens. They are in the Guard because they believe they can do good there – and often do. The Guard isn’t just a fighting force, but also fire-fighting and rescue and recovery and quite a few other things.

And now this is an opportunity to welcome them to Washington, explain that Trump’s orders are illegal and should be ignored by their commanders, and to build those bonds that will be important as Trump supporters are winnowed down to the hard-core grifters.

They should be reminded of the nature of our country, and not let it be remade into a Nation of Thieves & Victims by Trump. The Guard isn’t an invading force, but victims of Trump.

Word Of The Day

Crypto-hieroglyphs:

While studying the red granite pillar up close, [Egyptologist Jean-Guillaume] Olette-Pelletier identified several “crypto-hieroglyphs,” which use puzzles, wordplay, or special positioning to convey coded information. He noted that, high up on the side of the obelisk that once faced the Nile, Ramesses is depicted wearing a crown representing the union of Upper and Lower Egypt. Given its position on the obelisk, this hieroglyph would have been nearly impossible to read from the ground. It would only have been legible from the river, where nobles approached the nearby Luxor Temple by boat each year for the Opet festival, which celebrated the pharaoh’s authority. On the side of the obelisk overlooking a processional route used to bring offerings to the god Amun, Ramesses is shown wearing a crown with bull horns, which symbolized divine power. When paired with an image of an offering table, Olette-Pelletier believes, this hieroglyph exhorted viewers to make offerings to Amun to moderate his destructive tendencies. [“Crypto Power,” Daniel Weiss, Archaeology (September/October 2025)]

Current? Movie Reviews

Yes, the magnitude of the bad breath is exponential to the number of people it’s killed. Frankly, its teeth should be rotting and her skull melting, it’s so bad. I mean, it might even be worse than mine after a night of snoring!

Death of a Unicorn (2025). Cool name for a story, isn’t it? Yeah?

Savor it. Because it’s the best part of this clunker. It starts right at the beginning, when I turned to my Arts Editor and said, “This feels like a paint-by-number movie.” The money-distracted divorced father, trying and failing to connect with the daughter. The disaffected daughter, alone among the crowd of … rich, yet money-besotted, family hosting them in the Canadian Rockies.

And what happens when the divorced father, trying to win his daughter’s, doesn’t notice that, ummmmm, unicorn standing in the middle of the road?

Yes, this is all painfully predictable, outside, perhaps, of the set of chompers these magical beasties sport. Impressive in what should be herbivores. I mean, that is a fermentation vat between their legs and not a meat grinder.

But never mind. It’s terrible. The unicorns are sort of fun. But this wretched story is just not worth it.

Intel Inside

… of the Federal Government.

Right-wing pundit Erick Erickson is angry at his own side for the acquisition, by President Trump the Federal government, of 10% of old chip-maker Intel. From CNBC:

Intel, the only American company capable of making advanced chips on U.S. soil, said in a press release that the government made an $8.9 billion investment in Intel common stock, purchasing 433.3 million shares at a price of $20.47 per share, giving it a 10% stake in the company. Intel noted that the price the government paid was a discount to the current market price.

It’s not explicit, but the wording suggests the source of the shares is the Intel treasury and not the market. This, in turn, can signal to the market dilution, meaning voting power and the perceived value of each share just dropped, because future growth and dividends is now divided into 10% more shares.

But that’s not Erickson’s concern. Here it is:

But, again, the United States now is the largest shareholder of Intel, which puts every other microchip company at a disadvantage. Why? Because Intel now has subsidy by taxpayers. Instead of having to let the creative destruction of the market place pick apart Intel, which has chronically made bad decisions, the leadership that made those bad decisions has been rewarded.

Uncle Sam insists it will exercise no voting with its stock. But the fine print of the deal shows Uncle Sam is getting common stock with voting rights. Saying it will not vote and not actually voting are two different things. If the situation continues and a Democrat takes back the White House, you will see ESG and DEI explode as Intel seeks to humor its largest shareholder.

This is another step down a dangerous path. Defenders will say the government bailed out Fannie and Freddie. The government bailed out General Motors. The government even bailed out Chrysler. … [Chrysler] ultimately went bankrupt and got bought by Europeans, having never fully recovered.

Note the contradiction in Erickson’s post. He implies that now Intel will be successful, and yet gives examples of failure of other government interference. Additionally, he doesn’t explore context.

This is standard libertarian cant, and I’d like to emphasize that he’s not entirely wrong. The government trying to pick winners is, in an ideal environment, not a generally positive strategy. However, I don’t say that as if Intel’s competitors are now doomed, as I consider the government as just another evolutionary force.

From theoretical aspects, given general human psychology, this is not a guaranteed success. In fact, if Intel’s really in deep trouble – and, I confess, I’ve not followed Intel’s story, as I prefer the stocks of companies with market caps of substantially less than Intel’s, even if Intel’s has dropped off. Money does not guarantee success. Unless the Trump Administration reforms Intel in some way, such as looking at toxic culture, or poor technical innovation and development, or any or all of several other areas, Intel will just take longer to slump from market irrelevance to bankruptcy.

Practically, come on. This is the Trump Administration. They fail, fail, fail. Trump nominated and caused to be confirmed a pack of people inferior to himself, as I’ve noted before, so even if he doesn’t interfere personally, his minions will botch it.

That said, I found this statement dubious:

The government keeps making companies too big to fail and hiding behind “national security” as the excuse. In fact, that has become the consensus talking point among defenders who will say things like, “I’m uncomfortable with this, but national security…”. It is an excuse and justification, but not reality.

Unfortunately, the world is a dangerous place. That’s not abnormal, actually, there’s always someone out there gunning for #1, and #1 is currently being led by a demented moron. The report from CNBC included this:

Intel, the only American company capable of making advanced chips on U.S. soil…

While You play the hand you’re dealt is inadequate to the situation, it may make sense to boost Intel in a world where the biggest and best chipmaker, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), is located in Taiwan, next door to belligerent China which claims the island nation, and primary chip equipment maker ASML is located in The Netherlands, arguably not all that far from equally belligerent Russia – and those missiles its President flings about with abandon.

So it’s worth considering the assertion that the thinly hidden agenda behind Erickson’s statement to be a foolish chase after ideological purity. Libertarianism, from the time when I thought it was a serious political philosophy, was very weak in foreign relations, and boiled down to rationales for Keep taxes low! and Keep your government out of my business!

Using reductionism in foreign relations is a greedy mug’s game.