I just like this picture as it’s evocative of another era. This is the Main Navy and Munitions Buildings, built in 1918 and demolished in 1970.
How much alike, and how much different, are we from the Americans who built and worked in these buildings?
Axios has a disturbing report:
The number of partisan-backed outlets designed to look like impartial news outlets has officially surpassed the number of real, local daily newspapers in the U.S., according to a new analysis.
Why it matters: Many of those sites are targeted to swing states — a clear sign that they’re designed to influence politics.
An independent press run by public spirited citizens is a vital part of a free democracy. These are not – the chained dogs of people frantic to win, because that’s how they advance up the all-important social ladder of prestige and, well, We’re better than you!
Which is all a bit pathetic and a commentary on how the evolutionary positive features of yesterday just don’t scale up so well.
PS Gotta love this:
Catch up quick: These types of websites are often referred to as “pink slime,” a term that originated in the ground beef industry.
- The term has been used for more than a decade to describe politically motivated websites masquerading as independent local news outlets.
Wow. Just wow.
Mr Trump visited Capitol Hill yesterday. Rep Schiff’s (D-CA) comment?
It’s bring your felon to work day. pic.twitter.com/XNMu6JQ2d8
— Adam Schiff (@AdamSchiff) June 13, 2024
And yesterday’s predicted behaviors begin. First, let’s set the table: Hunter Biden’s trial was a Federal investigation and prosecution leading to convictions, in contrast to the Trump trial, which was a State investigation and prosecution, resulting in convictions. For those readers who don’t quite understand the legal niceties, State prosecutions are beyond the meddling of the President or Congress, as Rep Jordan (R-OH) has found out. Federal prosecutions, while the territory of the DoJ, could be subjected to undue influence, so the fact that Hunter Biden was convicted suggests that either President Biden threw his surviving son under the bus, or he’s terrible at meddling – or he did the right thing and didn’t meddle.
Let’s lead off with Rep Andrew Clyde (R-AL):
Hunter Biden’s guilty verdict is nothing more than the Left’s attempt to create the illusion of equal justice.
Don’t fall for it. [X]
Brevity with conspiracy. I like it. But failing to confuse the reader with loads of justificatory bullshit runs the risk letting the reader say, “Wha–?!” and recognize the contradiction. 3/5.
Kash Patel:
“Hunter Biden’s guilty verdict is a rare example of constitutional justice, one not where individuals receive biased treatment based on their last name,” Patel said. “The jury was able to consider the prosecution and defense evidence in full, in accordance with due process — a right that was single-handedly bastardized against President Trump by the judge, jury and prosecutors in New York.” [NBC News]
Positive points for bullshit, negative points for not presenting evidence that Trump was mistreated by the legal system of New York, more negative points for not mentioning the Federal vs State distinction, and more positive points for not claiming Hunter was sacrificed on the altar of the Left. 3.5/5, I’d say, but ya couldn’t dance to it. Oh, and Patel will look back on this moment in twenty years and squirm uncontrollably. We’re not talking about a bench trial, we’re talking about a jury trial, and if base illegalities did take place, the jury would have found for Trump. Instead, they found for the State, and rather quickly.
Former Trump advisor Stephen Miller falls down on the job:
The gun charges are a giant misdirection. An easy op for DOJ to sell to a pliant media that is all too willing to be duped. Don’t be gaslit. This is all about protecting Joe Biden and only Joe Biden.
No evidence, too generic, and projects Mr. Trump’s central character flaw of being a solipsist onto President Biden, which, given the President’s behavior patterns over the year, flawed as they might be in my reader’s eyes, does not match up as a narcissist. 1/5, and trying to not look embarrassed when questioned by folks who depend on you, Mr. Miller, will be a chore much like trying to choke down cowshit.
Non-public facing people can be a bit more forthright. Here’s an anonymous Republican strategist:
“It, at a minimum, slows the momentum and the clear-cut argument that the Trump campaign previously had about Biden’s weaponization of the justice system. … It’s less of a bumper-sticker than it was before.” [NBC News]
Of course, strategists who lie to themselves and others become unemployed rather quickly. Allies are not in the same boat, but they hate surprises even more. This guy shows poor judgment in being an ally of Trump, but they are at least honest:
“I think this won’t matter a ton, but it undercuts the argument of a two-tiered system of justice,” said one Trump ally who made the case that the former president would be better off letting that line of attack wither. “The more that argument exists and is pushed, the worse it is for Trump. It’s too close to ‘threats to democracy’ and drives that issue — the only issue where Biden enjoys a lead.” [NBC News]
4/5. The deduction comes from the misjudgment – or lie – that Biden only enjoys a lead on threats to democracy. Respect for military service, management of government debt, support for law enforcement, employment, even immigration, these are just some of the issues in which Biden enjoys an edge – in reality. In the realm of lies, though, he’s in trouble.
Given all these quotes, though, perhaps a Democrat should get a quote.
“The only ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ going on around here is on the other side of the aisle,” [Rep Jim McGovern (D-MA)] explained. “People are saying that Biden orchestrated the conviction of his own son in order to justify the criminal charges against Trump. That is how you think when you are in a cult.” [Maddowblog]
It’s a cult, a cult devoted to the idea that passionate religious zeal is as valid as sober appraisals of reality, a cult in which, as is usually the case, the leaders are grifters.
Which sounds like a band name. But they’re looking good this season.
Don’t leave home without it! Whatever it is!
Trundling through the races, here’s what strikes me as still in doubt, or might be in view of future events:
Governor Jim Justice (R-WV).
West Virginia appears to be changing columns from Democrats to Republicans. However, this expectation could disappear if Senator Manchin, who previously announced his retirement and changed his Party registration from Democratic Party to Independent, changes his mind and files to run against Elliott (D-WV) and Justice (R-WV). It’s not clear to me what happens in a Jim Justice vs Joe Manchin showdown, although, based on visage, it’s Justice all the way.
Now that Hunter Biden has been found guilty of all charges in his gun charges federal case, it might seem that the yelling from the Republicans that the DoJ has been weaponized would settle down out of embarrassment.
I don’t expect it to.
The Republicans, along with being fresh out of embarrassment, have to keep up the screaming because that’s darn near all they have left. Mr Trump botched the immigration issue, so they cannot successfully use it against the Democrats, although Mr Trump, who appears to be demented, may try nonetheless. They opposed an infrastructure package so popular that they show up at ribbon cuttings in order to steal the thunder. They’ve lost the appellation Law & Order Party when Mr Trump was convicted.
For knowledgeable observers, it doesn’t come off so well.
So I expect we’ll be hearing how the conviction of Biden will be proof that the DoJ has been weaponized by Biden, and he’s thrown his own son under the bus in order to make it look like it’s not weaponized. That’s my guess, a Heads I win — tails you lose! scenario that is the height of dishonesty.
And this is all the result of a Party trying to follow the dictates of disgraced former Speaker and Rep Newt Gingrich (R-GA), that dictate being Never let the Democrats win. I was thinking about this today and realized that a guy who no longer has skin in the game can say any damn thing; watching the Party members in Congress hopping around like frogs in a pelican nest is, really, quite a sad thing to contemplate when you remember this is the US Congress and not a drunken frat party.
I do hope they come up with something more inventive than just This proves they weaponized the DoJ! I do hope that all the extremists get dumped out of the political system, like pus squeezed from an infection, this time around.
This is a disconcerting headline on CNN/Business:
Chiquita found liable for financing paramilitary group
Click on me?
For those not familiar with the name, Chiquita produces and distributes bananas, primarily from South America; they were once known as the United Fruit Co. In general, banana companies have been known to treat Central and South America as its own little plantation; the advent of leftist political movements and groups in those areas generated alarm concerning their profits.
So it appears Chiquita was willing to terrorize and kill those who threatened their profit.
At the moment, they appear to be liable for some fines, but the question of, well, humanity raises its head. Shouldn’t the folks who financed and enabled such actions be punished rather more severely? Admonishment is hardly enough.
I’m just rather gobsmacked that this happened. Yeah, yeah, I’m naive. But it’s true.
Shitpost:
You’ll want to go stick this in all the MAGA mistrial threads. 👇 pic.twitter.com/MiciimBIyW
— Rachel Bitecofer 🗽💡🔭🦆 (@RachelBitecofer) June 8, 2024
And why gatekeepers are actually valuable.
This is a bit mind, er, bending:
… gravitational lensing has been around for a while, but now it is about to enter a compelling new chapter. Scientists know it isn’t just light that can be lensed, but gravitational waves too. It is a mind-bending concept: ripples in space-time themselves being distorted by the curvature of space. It is also a deeply important phenomenon that could illuminate the secret interiors of neutron stars, settle a mystery about the power of dark energy and test gravity itself more keenly than ever. And here is the best part: we may be on the cusp of spotting our first lensed gravitational wave. [“We are about to hear echoes in the fabric of space for the first time,” Jonathan O’Callaghan, NewScientist (18 May 2024, paywall)]
Gravity waves are just barely within my comprehension, my intuition. I’m not sure if gravity lensing marches out into Here there be dragons territory, or if it still makes sense.
All out of fingers. But who is out of hope? Depends where you live, I suppose.
Which is reproductive health issues, and who controls them — those who carry the burden, or the government. Here’s a link to the kickoff of this series.
Dartagnan of Daily Kos recently presented a wrapup of the point of my The Leading Issue – it’s gone from being the path up the mountain of social prestige for anti-abortionists, nearly all Republicans, to being a hand grenade glued to the hands of those resolutely against abortion; for Republicans, being anti-abortion is a litmus test – unless your name is Larry Hogan (R-MD), and then it’s a near thing.
In order to lure more women voters to their side of the ballot, Republican candidates have only a couple of choices, one being to use a fear-based approach, such as the Divine will hate you if you vote for the pro-choice candidate, or other attributes of the Democrats are so fearful that the Republicans are still the better choice.
This has been going on, successfully, for thirty and more years, because Roe v Wade was the Republicans’ shield. That’s right, not the Democrats’, but the Republicans’. They could fund raise against that SCOTUS decision and rail against it and do the dance of the anti-abortion poseur on it, knowing this Constitutional right would protect them. Voters could vote for candidates with anti-abortion positions without fear of losing that Right, because neither State legislature nor Congress could override the decision of SCOTUS.
But the Republicans allowed themselves to be fooled by their own arguments, self-righteousness, and arrogance. The Republican wink wink nudge nudge , that is, their secret knowledge of their shield, of thirty, forty, fifty years ago was an unstable point, meaning it either had to get out in public, because secrets swiftly are not secrets as more and more people learn them, or be forgotten.
The wink wink nudge nudge, it turns out, was apparently forgotten, and now a lot of earnest anti-abortion politicians and members of the base celebrated their perceived victory brought on by the Dobbs decision, thereby gluing hand grenades to their persons. Dobbs tells women that they are not permitted to safeguard their bodies against biological mistakes and other catastrophes, that they may have to sacrifice themselves to satisfy the dubious sensibilities of those who imagine they know the mind of God.
But the Republicans are starting to wake up, maybe too late, to the menace on their left, of how Dobbs has persuaded women voters to vote for their lives and for their own sensibilities, and some of these politicians are reacting. This has its own risks for these politicians, of course, as the anti-abortion segment of the Republicans may abandon all candidates who flip flop on the issue. Caveat emptor.
All from pointers in Dartagnan’s article, for which I am grateful.
Add in the previously reported Larry Hogan (R-MD) flip flop, and we can see this is getting serious.
But the Democrats have chosen to put pressure on the Republicans by emphasizing that certain right-wing elements do not approve even of even contraception.
Senate Republicans have blocked legislation designed to protect women’s access to contraception, arguing that the bill was just a political stunt as Democrats mount an election-year effort to put GOP senators on the record on reproductive rights issues, [AP]
For those voters who pay attention to politics, this will be significant. However, this is a shockingly small percentage. How many Americans are aware that access to contraception has been threatened by certain conservative elements?
The Democrats will have to work hard to get that message across. But if they succeed, they may win a few more seats in the House, and even save one in the Senate.
Steve Benen has an overview here. Professor Richardson adds one more succinct point:
All the Republicans running for reelection this year voted no: John Barrasso (R-WY), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Ted Cruz (R-TX), Deb Fischer (R-NE), Josh Hawley (R-MO), Pete Ricketts (R-NE), Rick Scott (R-FL), and Roger Wicker (R-MS).
So there is an element of vulnerability for the Republicans.
If it were Kim and Bashaw only, I’d look at these numbers and give it to Kim, but Senator Menendez filing to run as an independent may considerably complicate the calculus.
Senator Tester advanced with 56,000+ votes, or 97% of the Democratic primary votes. Sheehy also gained 56,000+ votes, or nearly 74% of the Republican primary votes.
Look for a tight race: Sheehy, a businessman, will flash his bona fides, while trying to pivot his position on abortion; Tester will talk about extremist Republican positions on abortion while stressing his experience and ties to the people of Montana.
Erick Erickson has been given the assignment of keeping his herd together, so he’s trying to inspire loathing and disdain for President Biden:
Today, he will announce executive action to secure the southern border. It is something he could have done three years ago. He is only doing it now because he is being led by the polls instead of leading.
Immigration and border security are major issues. For the last few months, they have been the top issues for Americans. Biden, acting now, opens himself to criticism for not acting soon.
But Biden is acting at this particular moment because he does not want to secure the border. By waiting until this moment and by broadcasting what he will do, he has given progressive activists enough time to prepare their lawsuits and run to court to enjoin his actions. A progressive judge in California will probably halt the executive order. Biden will try to look tough while also ensuring he can blame the courts for not letting him have his way. Unlike student loans, he will not try to find his way around this injunction.
This is all theater.
And, yes, it is theater – but, as Senator Schumer (D-NY) has hammered home, of a different sort. President Biden requested support from Congress on the matter, and Senator Lankford (R-OK) took the lead on hammering out a bill that most agreed imposed some of the toughest immigration measures in decades, but eventually he had some bipartisan support. Enough, he and Minority Leader Senator McConnell (R-KY) thought, to send it through to the House.
Then Mr. Trump, thinking he scented an opportunity, ordered his Senate allies to kill the bill. Reportedly, he’ll be using the border issue in his Presidential campaign.
And so President Biden did not get the needed Congressional support. After sensibly waiting for it, he’s forced to use a possibly illegal executive order.
I think Mr. Trump has, once again, miscalculated. With careful messaging, the immigration issue, much like the Republican’s loss of the Rule of Law Party appellation with the convictions of Mr. Trump, and the consequent attacks on law enforcement and the judiciary by his minions both in and out of Congress – a major loss of prestige for the Republican Party, worthy of the label fiasco – can become a Democratic advantage, by contrasting President Biden’s efforts to keep within the law while protecting the Nation, vs Mr. Trump’s heedless use of the issue to his own ends.
Erickson supports someone whose conception of ethics and morality centers around how he can use them to manipulate others to his own end.
This is what Erickson has been reduced to. Toxic team culture, appropriated by an ethically and morally challenged individual who charms the base into supporting him, is a disaster for the nation and for Erickson.
Mephitic:
smelling very bad:
- The creatures are believed to live in the mephitic swamps of the region.
- The mephitic fumes from the machine made their throats burn. [Cambridge Dictionary]
Some definitions suggested noxiousness unto death. Noted in “Russian arms dealer tells Alex Jones the US needs a new J6 insurrection to prevent nuclear war,” TheCriticalMind, Daily Kos:
Alex Jones interviewed [Russian arms dealer Viktor] Bout on his InfoWars show. The topic was Bout’s support for Trump and his promotion of a bigger Jan 6 insurrection. It beggars belief. Lord Haw Haw is now broadcasting from inside the house. The mephitic Jones claims he is a patriot. Bullshit. He is an enemy of America and Americans. Meanwhile, the MAGAs who think Jones is on to something are lost to reason.
Ever wonder if Dr. Fauci, our health leader during the Covid-19 pandemic, was, indeed, an evil mastermind out to make everyone wear a mask because, ah, it makes us look odd? WaPo’s Dana Milbank observes that the GOP mission to expose the retired doctor and NIH leader seems to have aborted:
Documents and testimony the panel gathered over 18 months, while finding misbehavior by a grant recipient and by an adviser to Fauci, produced nothing to substantiate these wild allegations. The United States did not fund research that created the pathogen. Fauci didn’t lie about the U.S. role in “gain of function” research at the laboratory in Wuhan, China. He didn’t try to suppress the lab leak theory, or bribe people to reject it. He didn’t get rich off the pandemic, either — although he testified that he earned about $120 a year from an antibody he developed years ago.
The gibbering madness exhibited by the GOP House members in the face of reason and facts can lead to a number of conclusions. My favorite is the failure of the news gathering organizations to survive as independent organizations has been a disaster for both citizens and Congress. A trustworthy, local news source that delivers the nonsense in which these members of Congress indulge, both before and after an election, should result in their elimination in competitive elections; weak news sources, both quality and in terms of being easily swayed by blandishments, mislead their audience to the detriment of voters and Congress.
In moderation, it brings roses. Bushes. Whatever. These blind shots came out rather lovely.
NOTE: This entry appears to have been inserted into the blog on May 1, so I’m republishing it. My apologies.
A fifth installment? Is this then considered a success? I doubt it.
The Republican Party has, as a whole, the problem of the former President Trump on their hands. Convicted of 34 felony counts falsifying business records, he is now a convicted criminal. His allies’, or perhaps more accurately minions‘, support of him is now a potential anchor around their necks.
And many of them added more and more cables to that anchor over the last weeks as they went to New York City and pronounced Trump innocent, thus discrediting themselves when the jury came back with a guilty verdict, and did so with notable speed.
Some Members of Congress don’t care. Representing safe districts or states, they only worry, or worried, about being primaried by challengers more extreme than themselves.
But for others, their alliance with someone who committed crimes in order to be elected seven years ago is a major problem for independent and moderate conservative voters, who will refuse to vote for both Trump and his allies, despite Democratic flaws.
It all depends on Democratic messaging. I expect it’ll be expertly handled.
And if Trump continues to shriek about rigged trials and claim there is evidence of his innocence that was not submitted at the trial, it only gets worse for him. His claim that he was not permitted to bring those witnesses forth is ludicrous to all but the most devoted MAGA-head.
Recognition that candidate quality matters to independent voters must be an irritating surprise for some ambitious would-be candidates, but it’s a necessity in today’s world of aggressive national adversaries and nuclear weapons. The Republican Senate Election debacle of 2022 occurred under the leadership of Senator Rick Scott (R-FL), but whether it’s because the Republicans see his leadership as a joke, or because he’s running for reelection this year, he’s been replaced with Senator Steve Daines (R-MT), who appears to be more serious about the job than Senator Scott. The Republican pundit Erick Erickson, despite his desperation to keep the herd together, seems to get it:
And winning the election means picking real candidates who are not going to alienate middle class, independent voters *cough* Kari Lake *cough*. Frankly, in 2022, the GOP nominated clunker candidates who scratched itches, but made independent voters squeamish. In other words, the right’s reaction to the left’s actions was to nominate candidates who could “fight,” but lost all the fights.
To my mind, in 2020 and 2022 the political far-right nominated power and position hungry candidates, ideologues who were ideologues because it gave them social prestige, and theocrats who either passionately believe they were doing God’s will, or were in it for the social prestige thing.
Erickson’s problem is that he’s looking for candidates who keep him happy, keeping in mind he’s a far-right wing extremist, while making independents happy as well, and that’s a really big stretch. Worse, the ideologically pure, right or left, are rarely competent politicians in the American mold. They may fit right in with the murderous cultures of V. Lenin or F. Franco, but being humble rather than ambitious and arrogant as required by many in America? Hard to do for them. After all, God’s on their side.
Here’s a short article on the aforementioned Senator Daines:
An early Trump supporter, Daines worked with the former president to secure his endorsement of [“winsome candidates”]. Trump endorsed Gov. Jim Justice over Rep. Alex Mooney in West Virginia, and former Navy SEAL Tim Sheehy over Rep. Matt Rosendale in Montana, as well as former representative Mike Rogers in Michigan, David McCormick in Pennsylvania (whom he had passed over for Mehmet Oz in 2022) and businessman Eric Hovde in Wisconsin.
For Daines, a winsome candidate has independent voter appeal, a laudable and important goal. Does Daines have the judgment and drive to push his selections over the finish line? I see some problems.
Joan McCarter of Daily Kos believes GOP Senate candidates are, once again, of dubious quality.
Mercy Ormont on Daily Kos has a meditation on good pollsters and bad pollsters these days.
Indicted Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., has collected the necessary signatures to run for re-election as an independent, five people familiar with the matter said.
Menendez needs 800 signatures by Tuesday to gain ballot access in November and hopes to reach closer to 10,000 signatures by then, said three sources with knowledge of his plans.
One of the sources, who previously worked for Menendez, said Menendez, who is on trial on federal bribery charges, wants the number of signatures to be a “statement” in and of itself, “to show the level of support he still has.”
Menendez’s pride could be the downfall of the Democrats’ dreams of retaining control of the Senate. New Jersey may suddenly be on the hot list.
Regardless of the result, I urge all Americans to respect the verdict and the legal process. At this dangerously divided moment in our history, all leaders—regardless of party—must not pour fuel on the fire with more toxic partisanship. We must reaffirm what has made this nation great: the rule of law.
In response, he’s been smacked in the metaphorical teeth by what passes for the Republican Party leadership these days. Hogan is attempting to rally the traditional Republican Party that understood what it meant to be an American political party, but it’s not at all clear that he’ll be successful. In some ways, it would be very healthy for the United States if he were to win. But there’s probably more benefit in Democratic candidate Alsobrooks winning. Maryland may be coming back off the hot list, but Hogan gets to join the list of genuine American political heroes, while most of the rest of the current Republican Party leadership will not be on that list. Only those who testified to the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack would be eligible for the list, in my mind, such as former White House staffer Cassidy Hutchinson.
Governor Jim Justice (R-WV). Source: Wikipedia.
Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) is now (I-WV). Might he be considering rescinding his retirement announcement and take on Republican West Virginia heavyweight Governor Jim Justice (R-WV) and relative unknown Glenn Elliott (D-WV)? In some ways, it feels like West Virginia is a businessman’s political playground, as Manchin, Justice, and Don Blankenship (D-WV) are all businessmen who’ve been involved in this Senate race. Could there be personal animosity animating some of these maneuverings? This is all speculation, but if Manchin does enter the race, the tug of war between the two political titans could allow Elliott to win. West Virginia doesn’t go on the hot list unless Manchin decides he wants to retain his Senate seat.
By the way, the picture on the right of Governor Justice is just the sort of visage I’d rather not face for a job interview.
During the 2020 Presidential Election campaign Mr Trump was notorious for demanding that only votes counted on Election Day be valid, thereby excluding serving military, other overseas citizens, as well as early voters and mail-in votes.
How about other nations? This caught my eye this morning:
All 642 million votes cast during six weeks of the world’s biggest election, which ended on June 1, will be counted today. [CNN/Politics]
That would be India.
Irises are excited to get out there.
Up front is the baptisia.
Competition has been fierce for the nomination, but the idea of a group nomination from folks demanding the impossible is stronger than Republicans in Biden leaning districts presenting their allegiance:
Strongly worded statements are not enough.
Those who turned our judicial system into a political cudgel must be held accountable.
We are no longer cooperating with any Democrat legislative priorities or nominations, and we invite all concerned Senators to join our stand. pic.twitter.com/H0CzIjXgwC
— Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) May 31, 2024
They later picked up the signatures of Senators Johnson (R-WI) and Josh Hawley (R-MO), totaling ten. These ten are, as pundits have pointed out, demanding the White House void a State-level decision, a blatant and brazenly illegitimate act if President Biden were to attempt it, and which would be blocked State-level machinery, or even lack of machinery on the Federal side.
And if Biden doesn’t, these Senators, all far-right wingers, will Take their toys and go home.
No, I mean it. If my reader lives in one these States, reconsideration of that Senator for their position should occur, and speedily.
But, of course, one cannot read this without wondering just who is pulling their strings, because this is a good bit of madness. Excepting Senator Johnson, who is clearly demented at this point and should be retracted simply out of Wisconsin pride, they should all know better. As functioning adults and Senators, this is a shameful bit of pathos that, if it appeared on a movie screen, would reduce the audience to laughter.
In other words, is “Supreme Court candidate” Mike Lee really serious, or is he just dancing to the instructions of someone with gobs of money? ‘Cuz if he really did consider himself a SCOTUS candidate, he should know this.
A question for the history books, I suppose.
In case you haven’t been following the trial of Mr. Trump for falsification of business records to conceal an affair that might have damaged his 2016 campaign beyond redemption, OR if you have been following the sliming of the prosecutor who now gets to put Trump’s ears on his mantlepiece, but have forgotten his name – forgetful of you – the prosecutor’s name is Alvin Bragg, and Colbert King has a schadenfreude-filled, and unexpectedly satisfying, column condemning the commentariat’s (his word, not mine) criticisms of DA Bragg:
Here is some of what I found helpful to keep in mind as the case played out: That Bragg, born and raised in Harlem, attended Trinity, an elite private school on New York City’s West Side, before going on to earn a bachelor’s degree from Harvard and a juris doctor degree from Harvard Law.
That Bragg possessed copious skills and experience with public corruption and white-collar crime. That Bragg, as Manhattan district attorney, had secured the conviction of Allen Weisselberg, the Trump Organization chief financial officer, on 15 felony counts. That he had won a six-count indictment against Trump’s former strategist Stephen K. Bannon on money laundering and conspiracy charges in a case that has yet to go to trial. And that with the New York State attorney general’s office, Bragg oversaw the investigation against the Trump Foundation that was dissolved by court order to resolve claims of misuse of charitable funds. [WaPo]
Honest estimations by the commentariat? Or politics-driven twisted faux-judgments? A bunch of righteously arrogant amateurs who probably would have hated on the trial that stuck Capone in jail, finally? Certainly, catching Mr Trump for falsifying business records to conceal an affair is unglamorous. Charges less devious were preferred by minds that might be a little simple for the complex worlds of taxes and federal election finance laws.
But the charges worked, and the jury hardly even seemed to need a long discussion.
Don’t be surprised to hear of Bragg moving up, if he so wishes. And Trump’s appeals may come to nothing, if Bragg has planned properly for them.
And King’s column is tasty for those of us who detested the occasional sniping at Mr. Bragg.
One of the disappointments of the 2020-2022 House session was the failure of the Democrats to force House members to somehow isolate their House careers from their investment accounts, and some citizens are furious that nothing was done. So what’s the best way to convey the message? I like this one:
Watchdog groups have long believed that some lawmakers use [non-public information disclosed to members of Congress in private hearings and meetings] to make money in the stock market. Now a loose alliance of traders, analysts and advocates is trying to let Americans mimic the trades elected officials make, offering tongue-in-cheek financial products — including one named for former House speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and another that refers to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) — that track purchases and sales after lawmakers disclose them. [WaPo]
Their goal?
“Our mission isn’t to make everyone millionaires — it’s actually to highlight the hypocrisy of congressional trading in an effort to bring more transparency and trust back into our government,” said Christopher Josephs, the founder of Autopilot, an app that allows ordinary investors to mimic the trades of leading politicians, top hedge funders and other famous traders. “Hopefully it’s helping, but our slogan is, if you can’t beat them, join them.”
It might actually make the Congressional members richer, as increasing the demand for certain stocks will drive the price higher, and then when they sell the Congressional members will be the first ones out.
I do have concerns about what I’ll call non-organic trading, but at this point I’m reaching the edge of my experience. It sort of feels like a positive feedback loop, but I am uncertain that is true.
And the flowers are looking good.
Irises!
An out of focus perennial poppy.
Red lupine. They look a bit like Triffids.
Stenography:
Stenography, from the Greek words stenos (narrow) and graphein (to write), also known as shorthand, is an abbreviated or symbolic writing method that increases speed and brevity of writing as compared to longhand. Historically, stenography was written by hand on paper. The first stenography machines and keyboards were invented starting in the late 19th century. Stenography using a machine or keyboard is also called machine shorthand or less commonly, stenotyping, or simply steno. (See History of Stenography section for a great timeline that I went way overboard on.) [studysteno.com]
Which is not quite the same as steganography. Noted in “Don’t assume everyone is paying attention to the election,” Jennifer Rubin, WaPo:
The colorful coverage was far cry from the standard stenography (and repetition of inflated crowd size) we get from reports about his campaign appearances. The Guardian’s account was among the most vivid (and profane): [omitted]
