I wonder. Try this on for size:
I think this is reflective of the division of opinions within SCOTUS and the Federal Judiciary on certain questions:
Twenty years later, when the Supreme Court signing bonus eclipsed the nearly $200,000 salaries of federal judges, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy complained during a congressional budget hearing thatit“devalues the position of the judiciary.”
“Something is wrong when a judge’s law clerk, just one or two years out of law school, has a salary greater than that of the judge or justice he or she served the year before,” Kennedy told senators the following year.
The question of which way SCOTUS will lean has been important right from the start. The fact that, in my cases, it’s not safely predictable is the problem. And when it’s so polarized and worth so much money, well, I suppose it’s inevitable that experts will be hired in.