Qureshi’s longtime concerns were thrust into the national spotlight when Meta whistleblower Frances Haugen released documents linking Instagram to teen mental health problems. But as the revelations triggered a wave of bills to expand guardrails for children online, he grew frustrated at who appeared missing from the debate: young people, like himself, who’d experienced the technology from an early age.
“There was little to no conversation about young people and … what they thought should be done,” said Qureshi, 21, a rising senior at American University.
So last year, Qureshi and a coalition of students formed Design It For Us, an advocacy group intended to bring the perspectives of young people to the forefront of the debate about online safety.
Not only for the explicit issues mentioned here, such as the tension inherent in age-based access controls, but also for the undercurrents that I’m not convinced the youngsters will be aware of. Consider this:
Hiner and other youth advocates said they have worked closely with prominent children’s online safety groups, including Fairplay. Revanur said her group Encode Justice receives funding from the Omidyar Network, an organization established by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar that is a major force in fueling Big Tech antagonists in Washington. Qureshi declined to disclose any funding sources for Design It For Us, beyond its recent grant from the Responsible Technology Youth Power Fund.
Some young activists argue against such tough protections for kids online. The digital activist group Fight for the Future said it has been working with hundreds of young grass-roots activists who are rallying support against the bills, arguing that they would expand surveillance and hurt marginalized groups.
It’s not hard to imagine industry groups and national adversaries boosting groups they believe would lead to outcomes favorable to them – with little regard to the emotional and intellectual safety and development of the kids.
This is an ocean full of sharks.