Word Of The Day

Coruscating:

literary
flashing brightly

formal
extremely intelligent and exciting or humorous:
He’s known for his coruscating wit. [Cambridge Dictionary]

Noted in “The Lincoln Project understands that Trump’s enablers must pay a price,” Max Boot, WaPo:

In fact, the Lincoln Project’s founders have impeccable Republican credentials, but they are thoroughly disenchanted with the Party of Trump. One of the consultants affiliated with the Lincoln Project — Stuart Stevens — has written a forthcoming book called “It Was All a Lie: How the Republican Party Became Donald Trump” that explains in coruscating and compelling terms why he is done with a party he has served his whole life. Steven has run numerous GOP campaigns; he was Mitt Romney’s chief strategist in 2012. Yet he makes no attempt to paint Trump as an aberration. Rather, he sees the president as the distillation of decades of GOP dogma.

The Map Of Incompetence

I’m getting awfully damn bored of talking about it, but this map from Global Epidemics is a compelling illustration of those governors, celebrated just weeks ago in the right wing media, who have turned out to be terribly incompetent:

DeSantis of Florida, Ivey of Alabama, Kemp of Georgia. Abbott of Texas is looking worse. These are all Republicans. Louisiana’s governor is Democrat John Bel Edwards, and they’re not doing well at all, either. I have not heard what’s gone wrong for them. He’s a disappointment, as he’s a professional politician, which may sound like Hell to some folks, but bespeaks experience and even training (he’s a lawyer).

And, yes, parts of California also look bad. Governor Newsom (D) got off to a great start, but either he reopened too aggressively, or the people aren’t paying attention.

Here’s the link. It updates with new data, so your experience may vary from the above.

Echoes In The Epistemic Bubble

I cannot help but compare these two statements concerning Joe Biden by Republicans, and a comment on the Republicans by, ah, a Republican. Here’s those two on Biden:

“Joe Biden thinks he’s the heir apparent to Obama’s failed legacy, but let’s be frank — Obama can’t save his anemic presidential campaign,” said Trump campaign spokesman Ken Farnaso. “Make no mistake, since 2015, the political class and their partners in the media have consistently underestimated the connection between President Trump and everyday American families.”

Sam Nunberg, a former adviser to Trump, said that highlighting Obama could remind some voters why they backed Trump in the first place. “He is somebody who is not viewed as a competent president vis-a-vis the economy, the military and foreign policy,” Nunberg said of Obama. “That said, it would be better if he was not on the scene. . . . Trump’s reelection campaign was always going to have to have the most popular politician campaigning against him.” [WaPo]

Pushing personal opinion as fact when it comes to the other party is one thing. Pushing, again, personal opinion as fact when it comes to your own party is quite a different thing:

Does that mean the Lincoln Project favors a Democratic takeover of the Senate? Yup. But that doesn’t mean, as Trumpites blare, that it’s gone over to the far left. Its members have stayed on the center right while the Republican Party has been taken over, as [Republican consultant Stuart Stevens] writes, by “paranoids, kooks, know-nothings, and bigots.” Even staunch conservatives such as former national security adviser John Bolton and Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) are being excommunicated by the Trumpkins. [WaPo]

It doesn’t hurt, for me at least, that the paranoids, kooks, know-nothings, and bigots remark is congruent with what I and many others have been observing about the party, at least since the days of Gingrich, and I suspect Reagan’s days as well. The Republicans have been quite shrill for a long time. This is a consequence of the magical thinking rampant in the party.

Naturally, the Democrats must be careful not to become like the Republicans. Be raucous in your internal disagreements, my Dems, and walk away if a really wrong candidate has been nominated; only in this year should you ignore this advice. Always look for the most competent candidate, not the best ideologue.

Destroy And Rebuild

From Buzzfeed:

The Department of Homeland Security’s response to anti–police brutality protests in Portland, Oregon, has disturbed and angered many employees, who called the deployment of the federal force an unusual maneuver that could do long-term damage to the agency’s reputation. …

But conversations with 17 DHS employees, all of whom requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly on the matter, reveal that many at the agency disagree with the show of force. Some called for an investigation, while others said they feared the long-term consequences for the agency’s reputation.

“Despite working at DHS, I watch and learn about every day’s new descent into lawlessness and authoritarianism just like the rest of the world,” one employee said. “Being a part of this corrupt regime, even as I play no role in the decision-making process, leaves me disgusted by my employer and saddened for my country.” …

Another DHS employee said they’d never seen anything like what’s happening in Portland in their many years at the agency.

“We have a lot of work ahead in terms of repairing the public’s trust,” the employee said.

Repair? Repair?

I don’t think this is the sort of damage that can be repaired. I think you fire everyone at the agencies involved, and then rebuild from the ground up. Each employee is responsible to the American public for their behavior, and this behavior, of anonymous officers playing catch and release with peaceful protesters, is not acceptable. That means that not only is the leadership that didn’t resign when directed to organize this debacle responsible, it means all the officers who went trotting out to harass citizens also deserve to be fired.

At least this employee gets it:

“I did not sign up nor was I trained to be a street cop,” said one DHS employee who had not been deployed but had reservations of others being sent there. “Civil societies have immigration laws that need to be enforced, but that does not mean we should be used as this delusional president’s personal attack dog just because we happen to be available.”

Now they need to act on it.

Moving Up The Political Ladder

Rep Liz Cheney (R-WY), Conference Chair (#3 position in the GOP House Leadership) and, of course, a legislator with far right credentials and a former VP for a Dad, has to deal with some hyenas:

Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., on Tuesday faced down a group of GOP Freedom Caucus critics who complained about her public support for Dr. Anthony Fauci and her support for Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie’s primary opponent.

Cheney, chair of the House GOP Conference, defended Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert, during a closed-door conference meeting, according to a source familiar with her remarks.

On May 12, Cheney tweeted: “Dr. Fauci is one of the finest public servants we have ever had. He is not a partisan. His only interest is saving lives. We need his expertise and his judgment to defeat this virus. All Americans should be thanking him. Every day.” [NBC News]

Rep Gaetz studying a script for his bit part in Endgame. He’ll be playing a dead body.

Rep Matt Gaetz (R-FL), who should surely be acting in community theater rather than wasting his time in the House of Representatives, doesn’t seem repentant:

Steve Benen marvels:

In other words, while going after Cheney for failing to toe a pro-Trump line to their satisfaction, these far-right lawmakers pointed to an instance in which Cheney and Trump were aligned.

And while all of this internecine drama is interesting on its own — it’s not common for House Republicans to go after one of their own far-right leaders like this — let’s not miss the forest for the trees. Fifteen weeks from Election Day, Republicans have no platform, no policy agenda, no coherent vision, and no accomplishments to run on. They’re behind in the polls, facing poor odds, and confronting the possibility of a Democratic sweep.

It’s against this backdrop that several House GOP members are focusing their criticisms on one of their own leaders, who doesn’t appear to have done anything especially notable to earn their ire.

But I think Benen misses the key point: Cheney endorsed an expert. Remember, the Republicans, and especially the Freedom Caucus Tea Party members, can’t stand experts, because they might say something that infringes of their absolute freedoms.

Yeah.

Cheney spat right in the Holy Water of the Freedom Caucus, and it’s no surprise that Gaetz, et al, jumped in outrage.

From OnTheIssues.

I wonder how much longer Cheney, who’s otherwise a far right conservative, will remain in the Republican Party? It must be galling to discover your supposed ideological bedmates are actually mad as hatters. Or is she just hooked on the power and will overlook their, ah, warts?

And for Gaetz, et al, is this just squalling at the blasphemy, or is this also a RINO attempt, a chance to move up the political ladder?

Corralling The Pardon Power

On Lawfare Princeton’s Keith Whittington wants to modify the Presidential Pardon Power, but is a little shy of prescriptions:

We have seen a train of abuses of the pardon power. Future such abuses could be remedied through a bipartisan constitutional amendment. It is a straightforward matter to make it explicit that a president cannot pardon himself, and it should not be hard to take pardons of immediate family members off the table as well. It should also not be difficult to require that pardons be issued only after conviction, or that pardons cannot be issued during the lame-duck period after a presidential election and before a president-elect has been inaugurated. It is possible to entrench into the constitutional text a process for considering pardons, so that presidents in the future cannot bypass the Department of Justice and issue pardons based on personal appeals by friends, family and television news hosts. It would be possible to require others to sign off on the pardon, whether existing members of the president’s Cabinet or a new body like a pardon and parole board. It would be possible to make pardons conditional on a congressional vote, perhaps comparable to the vote to override a presidential veto of legislation. If Congress and then 38 states so decided, it would even be possible to give Speaker Pelosi the power she wrongly asserts that she already has and allow Congress to subject the pardon power to statutory regulation.

There are pros and cons to any reform of the pardon power, but Congress has examples and experience with which to work. Trade-offs and compromises would have to be made, but there is no good reason why this issue would have to get bogged down in partisan disagreements (though that does not always stop us). Both Republicans and Democrats can point to past abuses of the presidential pardon that they do not like, and both should be able to foresee the possibility of future abuses that they would not like. The presidential pardon power is not the most important issue facing the country, but it is a fixable one. It is time for Congress to consider drafting a remedy to a problem and not just complain about it.

While I’ve been thinking we need something for quite a while, I haven’t had any good ideas until this morning. I think there should be a clause that reads as follows:

If the Supreme Court of the United States, upon examination of a pardon, finds that is has obstructed justice, the pardon will be reverted, and the President will be punished by loss of office and a permanent ban on being elected to such offices.

Make it blindingly obvious that abuse will not be tolerated.

It could be fun to have it be a matter that can be appealed to the Federal judiciary. At each level, the potential punishment to be meted out to the President, if they should lose, could become greater. While at District Court only the pardon may be reverted, if the President dares, on losing a pardon case and appealing to a higher Court and loses again, the punishment may be more than reversion, at the Court’s option. At the Supreme Court, the loss could include the President’s job.

It would make for nerve-wracking entertainment.

The Transformation Of Free Trade

I’ve been speculating on how international trade will change in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic and international shutdown, and WaPo provides some more information, this time from Japan, on how they are beginning to adapt to the newly recognized realities of supply chains sometimes being a step too long:

Japan is paying 87 companies to shift production back home or into Southeast Asia after the coronavirus pandemic disrupted supply chains and exposed an overreliance on Chinese manufacturing.

While China’s economy is already recovering from the coronavirus shock, the pandemic threatens to dent its reputation as the “factory of the world” — at least in some industries.

Indeed, alarm bells started ringing in Japanese boardrooms as soon as the novel coronavirus emerged in the Chinese city of Wuhan, a major hub of the auto parts industry.

Of course, Japan must also be aware of China’s more aggressive posture, assumed since Xi Jinping took over, also endangers those chains supplied by China; in essence, those chains become levers of power for Jinping. To the extent that they can be supplanted by other sourcing, such as local, Jinping’s influence is mitigated.

But Japan, being a small, island country of few natural resources, has to be part of the international trading system. Don’t look for them to withdraw much.

Trump Is Probably Shocked

Along with his allies. NBC News reports:

So many words, so many fucking bigly words.

The American Civil Liberties Union and a law firm on Monday filed a legal challenge to the recent imprisonment of Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s former personal attorney.

The groups argue that Cohen was sent back to prison this month after being released on home confinement in retaliation for his plans to release a negative book about Trump before the November election.

“He is being held in retaliation for his protected speech, including drafting a book manuscript that is critical of the President — and recently making public his intention to publish that book soon, shortly before the upcoming election,” lawyers on behalf of Cohen wrote in Monday’s lawsuit.

Yep, the emblematic lefty organization, the American Civil Liberties Union, doing work for former Trump fixer and lawyer Michael Cohen.

This is what it means to have ethics, Mr. Trump.

And while the book probably won’t be published in time to influence the election, unless Cohen’s a fast writer or he has a ghostwriter, it’ll be another enlightening look at the guy that evangelicals think is just toothsome.

Sorry. Feeling a bit bitter today after the Portland mess.

The Free Press Should Shine

The Portland, Oregon debacle, in which anonymous Federal officers are randomly arresting peaceful protesters, holding them for a few hours, and then releasing them – while sometimes putting black bags over their heads – is appallingly reminiscent of other incidents of barbarism in recent American history. I speak, of course, of the incidents of torture during the Iraq occupation, undertaken as Americans faced IEDs and other resistance, as well as pressure to find Saddam Hussein. Black hooded men, forced into pressure positions, or water-boarded, all while American politicians pettily argued whether particular interrogation techniques were torture, was a black blot on American honor. The references are unmistakable.

A scene from a John Lewis retrospective. I can only guess that is actually Lewis submitting to the policeman’s baton.

Fortunately, Americans, properly informed, are not snowflakes. We have many examples of meeting barbarity head-on, as the tragic passing of civil rights titan Rep John Lewis reminds us. The barbarity of the right-fringe currently in power, so long as it’s met as peacefully as possible, will discredit itself, its progenitors, and its agents so thoroughly that only in their own minds will they consider themselves justified or honorable. These folks are certainly full of spunk.

It’s not too soon to offer analyses of the pathological currents in society that has led to these contretemps.

First up is an old theme for this blog: the mistaken belief that amateurism is good in critical affairs. Amateurs are great in many things, even indispensable in such non-critical pursuits as astronomy, but I’d never want one to fix my car, eh? Similarly, letting amateurs at the controls of government will lead us towards the cliffs of doom – as we’re seeing now.

Second, recklessly attempting to import the processes of the private sector into the public sector, along with people whose vision is limited to private sector practices, leads to events which are ineffective and even corrupt in the public sector, but if they’re not in the private sector, well, those people don’t even get it. For them, if it worked over here, surely it will work over there. Multiple reports exist of elements of the Federal response to the pandemic being approached in just this manner – and we can see the results from here. It’s a fiasco.

Third, the ceaseless rattle of religion within the GOP. There was a reason the Johnson Amendment was made into law so many years ago. It traded tax-exempt status for the various churches which promised not to preach concerning politics, and it was important because houses of worship inject an element of absolutism into a political world, whose nature during successful times is marked by compromise – anathema to the blindly religious and their leaders. When one religion or another is in control, they employ unrebuttable, yet ludicrous, arguments to bolster their positions, no matter how nutty – and, for those who don’t submit, they threaten terrible, if imaginary, divine punishment – and sometimes physical punishments as well. As Barry Goldwater noted long ago,

Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they’re sure trying to do so, it’s going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can’t and won’t compromise. I know, I’ve tried to deal with them.

The deadly combination of certainty of Divine intentions, no-nothingism and its concomitant disdain for experts and knowledge, and all the general arrogance that goes along with it has proven fatal to the Republican Party’s ambition to be a governing Party. They cannot compromise, as Goldwater noted, and when corruption grips the upper reaches, there is no process for eliminating the pus that is Trump and his Evangelical Advisory Board.

Who are the latter? It’s surprising difficult to find out the current list of members. I see former Rep Michele Bachmann (R-MN) was at least once on the board, and having watched her pronouncements on high, I would not want her to be in a position of advising the President. My Arts Editor, a former Baptist, remarked during research that they seemed to be mostly “prosperity megachurch” pastors, which makes sense: the celebration of money is a mark of corruption.

But here’s Paul Brandeis Raushenbush of Auburn Seminary, relaying the judgment of Dr. Robert Jones, in reaction to the Charlottesville riots earlier in the Trump Presidency:

One person who isn’t surprised is Dr. Robert Jones, CEO of  the polling and research firm PRRI and whose book The End of White Christian America is crucial reading for understanding the reaction of White Evangelicals to this President.  Jones told Voices:

“With regard to Trump’s evangelical advisory committee, the views he espoused this week are consistent with views he expressed in the campaign. So the evangelicals on his advisory committee knew this was the president they were agreeing to serve. And like most things in the Trump orbit, the committee is mostly setup to be a Trump fan club rather than a committee that broadly represents the major entities in the evangelical world.

Also note: Given white evangelicals’ own checkered past supporting segregation and remaining silent about white supremacy groups (something I covered in my book), there may in fact be widespread agreement with the remarks.  For example, we conducted some recent analysis of perceptions of the Confederate flag, and found that 72% of white evangelicals say that they see the Confederate flag more as a symbol of southern pride than as a symbol of racism.

It’s fairly damning. The mixing of politics and theology is, as ever, a potent and poisonous mixture.

If the organization that succeeds the Republican Party as representative of the conservative wing of the country wishes to do better than these last dregs of the GOP are doing, those are just some of the principles to keep in mind. Negative, even exclusionary, that’s how it’s reading to me: toxic proposals deserve to be tossed in the trash and never seen again, no matter how much prestige the proposer has.

And it’s up the press, unbiased media, to bring these bad practices to light.

Belated Movie Reviews

Yes! Yes! Pull my hair in anger! It makes me feel … alive!

Tormented (1960) suffers from a sloppy story. Whether Tom Stewart, supreme jazz pianist and the star attraction at an island wedding, is psychologically unstable, or if his former girlfriend, Vi, really is a supernatural critter from Hell, he’s in a helluva pickle – but we really can’t tell which is which, because we know virtually nothing about him. We end up watching Vi fall from the dilapidated light tower at which she requested they meet, and then wonder at his self-judgment that that his refusal to render aid in a crisis leaves him blameless. Did she deserve to be saved? Is he just a moral coward? Or was he distracted by his upcoming wedding to another woman?

And, apparently, Vi is fairly irritable as well, not to mention mildly monomaniacal. She might be dead, or a talking plastic head on his table – take your pick – but she still wants the pleasure of being married to him.

There might be an interesting story in there somewhere. The hopeful other bride, Meg, has a little sister who does fairly well at stealing scenes and typifying moral dilemmas. But the story’s really a mess, the special effects made me giggle, and my Arts Editor was cringing at this jazz musician’s efforts.

My advice is a little light sauce to get started, and try substituting your own lines for the characters’ lines. It’ll make this movie a little easier on the stomach.

And check out the actors’ bodies! In our print, at least, they all looked malformed, as if the film had been oddly stretched at some point.

Or you could get on with your life, instead.

How To Win Friends and Influence People

Try beating these people up in Portland and see what that does for your reputation, whether you’re President Trump or a truncheon swinging anonymous Customs and Border Protection officer:

We’re more holier than thou, you jerks!

Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law.

That’s a pillar of the American experiment, as I’ve argued many times. From the homeless to the President, none are exempt, none get special treatment just because of who they are or the position they occupy. SCOTUS agrees. And if it seems like we don’t always practice it, it remains our ideal.

And that’s an element of my argument why Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA), up for reelection this November, really deserves to be upended and sent home. Here’s the hypocrisy flowing from her mouth:

U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst said Friday that the Senate should hold hearings on any Supreme Court nomination President Donald Trump might make this year, even if he loses November’s election.

“(If) it is a lame-duck session, I would support going ahead with any hearings that we might have,” Ernst, a Republican, said during a taping of the Iowa Press show on Iowa PBS. “And if it comes to an appointment prior to the end of the year, I would be supportive of that.” …

U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley, a Republican, drew Democrats’ condemnation in 2016 when, as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, he blocked confirmation hearings for President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland.

That seat became vacant when Justice Antonin Scalia died unexpectedly in February 2016. Obama made his appointment shortly after, but Grassley led the effort to block Garland’s confirmation.

At the time, Grassley cited “the Biden Rule” — a guideline stemming from a speech given by then-Senator Joe Biden in 1992 — in holding up the process. Grassley said the decision to fill the vacancy should be made by whomever was elected president in November 2016 — nine months after the seat became vacant.

Ernst publicly agreed with Grassley’s decision. [Des Moines Register]

This “Biden rule” had never been taken seriously, I’d never heard of it, so I think Grassley was full of shit at the time, although, to his credit, he reiterated his support for that position recently (see above article).

Ernst did not follow suit. And her reasoning was such utter crap that she should be embarrassed to have uttered the words:

It’s very different than what we have seen in the past. We have seen … a president of a different party and a Senate of a different party in previous scenarios. But in this scenario, we have the same party that is the majority in the Senate and the same party that is in the White House.

Previous to this explanation, the most accurate description of the general Republican view that they can nominate, debate, and confirm a SCOTUS Justice when Trump is in office, but they’re somehow bound by a “Biden rule” when Obama was in office was just power-mad hypocrisy.

But it’s more than that, as Ernst makes clear. It’s the revelation that Republicans cannot be bound by the concept that all are equal before the law. That this rule, whether it’s a strong tradition or a bullshit tradition or simply a pack of lies concerning why Judge Merrick would not even be considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee, only applies to Democratic nominees and not Republican nominees, is a clear sneer at an American foundational stone, one of the most conservative elements of American society and the American legal system.

Ernst’s excuse is, in reality, simply putting that arrogant We’re more holier than thou, you jerks! attitude into concrete words.

This is why Ernst should be ejected from her powerful seat this November by outraged Iowa Republican voters who prefer to have true conservatives, by which I mean people of the caliber of the late Senator Lugar (R-IN), and not this Trump-loving denizen of the TrumpSwamp (current TrumpScore: 91%), in office. This is one reason her poll numbers have been far below where they should be in conservative Iowa. More importantly, this is why the entire Republican Party has been falling into national disrepute, and will need to be rebuilt on principles recalling the foundations of America someday.

Not the principles of a financial-quarter based failing business owner.

And perhaps it’s just the prism I stare through, but I am fascinated how the importation of the people and processes of the private sector into the public have been so steadily a disaster.

I Missed This Story

This is from my pre-blogging days, but I was becoming more politically conscious at the time, which was 2009. Steve Benen provides it:

In early 2009, congressional Republicans were eager to condemn the Democratic Recovery Act, which rescued the U.S. economy from the Great Recession. To that end, some on the right came up with a weird claim: the stimulus package included $1 billion to build a magnetic-levitation train from Los Angeles to Las Vegas.

There was no such provision, but Republicans became so invested in the falsehood that they started to believe it. A California-based journalist sat down with then-Rep. Mary Bono Mack (R-Calif.) in March 2009, and she pointed to the non-existent element of the Democratic plan as proof of its flaws. When the journalist reminded the congresswoman of reality, Bono Mack directed her staff to retrieve the bill. “It’s right there,” the GOP lawmaker said at the time. “Show him.”

A few minutes later, an aide emerged with a copy of the bill and quietly conceded, “It’s not in the bill.”

The congresswoman wasn’t intentionally trying to deceive anyone; she’d simply made the assumption that her party’s talking points were accurate and reliable. They were not.

Yes, there really is schadenfreude pie. So rich it rots your teeth out, roots first.

What a delicious story. Benen connects it to a similar incident that occurred over the weekend between the President and Chris Wallace of Fox News regarding Trump’s claims that Biden will defund the police if elected, which I saw. While I generally think we’d all be better off if Fox News sank into the swamp that it’s “opinion” aka propaganda shows have created, I think I’d jump into that fetid swamp to rescue Wallace. He’s had several incidents of not accepting bullshit from anyone, including the President. And he interviews fairly darn well on The Late Show.

Squeezing A Balloon

From WaPo:

The Trump administration is trying to block billions of dollars for states to conduct testing and contact tracing in the upcoming coronavirus relief bill, people involved in the talks said Saturday.

The administration is also trying to block billions of dollars that GOP senators want to allocate for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and billions more for the Pentagon and State Department to address the pandemic at home and abroad, the people said.

The administration’s posture has angered some GOP senators, the officials said, and some lawmakers are trying to push back and ensure that the money stays in the bill. The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to reveal confidential deliberations, cautioned that the talks were fluid and the numbers were in flux.

So … they want to conceal the extent of the pandemic by failing to measure it via testing.

Don’t these guys get it? Or are they so tied up in short-term thinking that it never occurs to them that there are proxies for metrics, such, say, hospitals so full of critically ill patients that they’re falling out the windows? President Trump’s frantic assertions that the virus will just “disappear,” emblematic of magical thinking, certainly is part of this strategy.

I think they can’t think beyond the end of their noses. They’re blinded by their ideology of the virtues of small government and the evils of big government, a sentiment I still get from some conservative friends, and so they push blindly onward, trying to cripple anything that smacks of it.

Meanwhile, people die and the economy continues to deteriorate. There’s a reason the rest of the world pities us.

Word Of The Day

Ghost food hall:

Enter Ghostline, an establishment that will gather several chefs cooking in different styles to offer takeout, delivery and limited patio seating in the Glover Park neighborhood starting Sept. 1, without serving customers inside. This “ghost food hall” is among a few food establishments whose owners are betting on an unusual business model to carry them through a crisis shaking the foundations of the restaurant industry.

Ghost food halls combine “ghost kitchens” — which serve meals exclusively by delivery — and food halls, both of which have become popular in recent years, said Alex Susskind, associate dean for academic affairs at the Cornell School of Hotel Administration. With the pandemic making indoor dining less safe than before, he said many people who were skeptical of takeout and delivery are suddenly using those services frequently and finding themselves hungry for new food options. [“The pandemic has hit restaurants hard, but experts say the ‘ghost food hall’ concept might save them,” Marisa Iati, WaPo]

Decision Of The Day

SCOTUS declined to hear this appeal:

Al Johnson’s Swedish restaurant has been a popular attraction for anyone traveling to Door County for its grass-covered roof and its herd of grass trimmers.

But a lawsuit by a New York attorney against Al Johnson’s sought to cancel the “Goats on a roof of grass” trademark owned by the well-known restaurant in Sister Bay.

That years-long petition has been denied by the U.S. Supreme Court. The court’s decision not to hear the case has ended the debate.

The lawsuit has been trying to strip the restaurant of its trademark since 2011. Attorney Todd Bank claimed it was demeaning to goats. [WMTV]

Demeaning to goats? Or was there something more going on here? I’m not sure I want to know. There are some limits to human knowledge I’d rather not breach.

(h/t GD)

That Win For Minorities, Ctd

The consequences of McGirt v. Oklahoma, the 5-4 decision in which the Native Americans won jurisdiction over eastern Oklahoma, are just beginning to become clear:

Instead of dealing with business-friendly regulators from the state of Oklahoma, oil producers may soon have to contend with both tribes and the federal government, which often manages land for Native Americans.

“The reality is that there’s something potentially that could be very detrimental to the oil and gas industry,” said Dewey Bartlett, a former Tulsa mayor who runs Keener Oil & Gas Company, a five-person oil and gas production and exploration firm with most of its wells now in Indian country. …

In a teleconference organized by the Petroleum Alliance of Oklahoma trade group soon after the July 9 decision, Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter (R) sought to reassure oil producers that their business wouldn’t be upended and the state would keep their interests in mind. …

On Thursday, Hunter and the five tribes came to an agreement for a legislative proposal to Congress that would give the Native American groups the right to collect taxes and grant them some authority over anything deemed to threaten the “welfare” of a tribe — a potential, though not certain, opening for environmental regulations.

The Petroleum Alliance of Oklahoma said it needed to study the agreement more before commenting. [WaPo]

From MacroTrends.

It sounds like the Native American tribes are getting off on the right foot. It’s their luck that the oil industry is in turmoil, even with the termination of the Russian / Saudi Arabian oil price war, due to a great slackening in demand for their product.

This may seem contrary, but I say it because, even at this great distance and with no personal connections to the Native American community, I perceive that their priorities are not that of the general American business community. The latter are all about the dollar; Native Americans, from coast to coast, reiterate their concerns for the health of the land. And the oil industry can be tough on the land. I look forward to how this story turns out.

And it just occurred to me to wonder how this decision will affect the physical health of the tribes involved. That psychic damage has been done by their oppression by the European invaders is undeniable. Will this victory in court, with consequent changes in their physical fortunes, help with the health of the Native American communities involved? I hope so.

Let the oil industry suffer a bit. It almost tastes like … the start of justice.

That Harshly Fair Question

Presidents should always be subjected to tough questions, so I was a little disappointed in Fox News‘ Chris Wallace’s response to a President Trump reaction to one of his questions:

In Sunday’s interview, Wallace noted that new cases had far outpaced increases in testing over the past month. He also confronted Trump about his incorrect and oft-repeated predictions that the virus would “disappear.”

“I will be right eventually,” Trump told the host. “You know I said, ‘It’s going to disappear.’ I’ll say it again.”

“Does that discredit you?” Wallace asked.

Trump said he didn’t think so. “It’s going to disappear, and I’ll be right,” he said. [WaPo]

The problem, of course, is that it’s an open-ended question, although even at that the novel coronavirus, aka SARS-CoV-2, may become part of the background population of human-affective viruses for centuries.

But the proper response from Wallace should have been,

Mr. President, how many more Americans will become infected and die before SARS-CoV-2 disappears?

And if the President doesn’t walk away on that question, a splendid follow up would be this:

Do you approve of “magical thinking” in Presidents? Doesn’t that simply lead to governmental paralysis as we wait for God to reach down and snuff out the virus?

That would have been far more revealing?