{"id":7918,"date":"2017-02-15T08:17:10","date_gmt":"2017-02-15T14:17:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/?p=7918"},"modified":"2017-02-15T08:17:42","modified_gmt":"2017-02-15T14:17:42","slug":"word-of-the-day-93","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/2017\/02\/15\/word-of-the-day-93\/","title":{"rendered":"Word of the Day"},"content":{"rendered":"

Collateral estoppel<\/em>:<\/p>\n

Collateral estoppel<\/b> (CE), known in modern terminology as issue preclusion<\/b>, is a common law<\/a> estoppel<\/a> doctrine that prevents a person from relitigating an issue. One summary is that, “once a court has decided an issue of fact or law necessary to its judgment, that decision … preclude[s] relitigation of the issue in a suit on a different cause of action<\/a> involving a party to the first case”.[1]<\/a><\/sup> The rationale behind issue preclusion is the prevention of legal harassment and the prevention of abuse of judicial resources<\/a>. [Wikipedia<\/strong><\/em><\/a>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Used on Lawfare<\/strong><\/em> by Samuel Bray:<\/p>\n

Many other objections to the national injunction exist (some are raised in this article<\/a>). It is an end-run around the requirements for class actions. Notably even in a class action, the remedy is supposed to protect the plaintiff class, not other people. National injunctions are also in tension with a number of technical doctrines of federal courts. These include doctrines about collateral estoppel against the government, limited authority for a single district judge to make precedent or \u201cclearly established law,\u201d and the narrow scope of who can bring contempt proceedings to enforce an order.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Collateral estoppel: Collateral estoppel (CE), known in modern terminology as issue preclusion, is a common law estoppel doctrine that prevents a person from relitigating an issue. One summary is that, “once a court has decided an issue of fact or law necessary to its judgment, that decision … preclude[s] relitigation \u2026 Continue reading → <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7918","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7918","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7918"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7918\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8103,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7918\/revisions\/8103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7918"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7918"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7918"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}