Dr. James Lovelock, a name familiar to anyone interested in ecology and a few other sciences, remains unrepentant at age 100 for his blasphemy:<\/p>\n
You have come under fire for some of your attitudes, like your pro-nuclear energy views.<\/b><\/p>\n
Has it occurred to you that most of the large money that circulates in this country comes from the fossil fuel industries? And they probably spend huge sums of money on anti-nuclear propaganda.<\/p>\n
So you think it is a contrived argument?<\/b><\/p>\n
Yes, the anti-nuclear argument is very much so. It\u2019s so safe, it\u2019s almost ridiculous. And it\u2019s improving. The latest form of nuclear energy being worked on uses thorium, rather than uranium, and it\u2019s almost impossible to get it to go into a runaway chain reaction or to do anything nasty. [NewScientist<\/strong><\/a>]<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
His biography says “independent scientist,” and he’s not kidding.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Dr. James Lovelock, a name familiar to anyone interested in ecology and a few other sciences, remains unrepentant at age 100 for his blasphemy: You have come under fire for some of your attitudes, like your pro-nuclear energy views. Has it occurred to you that most of the large money \u2026 Continue reading