{"id":24118,"date":"2019-02-17T10:00:40","date_gmt":"2019-02-17T16:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/?p=24118"},"modified":"2019-02-17T10:00:40","modified_gmt":"2019-02-17T16:00:40","slug":"word-of-the-day-452","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/2019\/02\/17\/word-of-the-day-452\/","title":{"rendered":"Word Of The Day"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Clade<\/em>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A\u00a0<b>clade<\/b>\u00a0(from\u00a0<a class=\"mw-redirect\" title=\"Ancient Greek language\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ancient_Greek_language\">Ancient Greek<\/a>:\u00a0<span lang=\"grc\"><span lang=\"grc\" title=\"Ancient Greek language text\">\u03ba\u03bb\u03ac\u03b4\u03bf\u03c2<\/span><\/span>,\u00a0<i>klados<\/i>, &#8220;branch&#8221;), also known as monophyletic group, is a group of\u00a0<a title=\"Organism\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Organism\">organisms<\/a>\u00a0that consists of a\u00a0<a title=\"Common descent\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Common_descent\">common ancestor<\/a>\u00a0and all its\u00a0<a title=\"Lineal descendant\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lineal_descendant\">lineal descendants<\/a>, and represents a single &#8220;branch&#8221; on the &#8220;<a class=\"mw-redirect\" title=\"Tree of life (science)\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tree_of_life_(science)\">tree of life<\/a>&#8220;.<sup id=\"cite_ref-1\" class=\"reference\"><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Clade#cite_note-1\" data-vivaldi-spatnav-clickable=\"1\">[1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>The common ancestor may be an individual, a\u00a0<a title=\"Population\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Population\">population<\/a>, a\u00a0<a title=\"Species\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Species\">species<\/a> (<a class=\"mw-redirect\" title=\"Extinct\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Extinct\">extinct<\/a>\u00a0or\u00a0<a class=\"mw-redirect\" title=\"Extant taxon\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Extant_taxon\">extant<\/a>), and so on right up to a\u00a0<a title=\"Kingdom (biology)\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Kingdom_(biology)\">kingdom<\/a>\u00a0and further. Clades are nested, one in another, as each branch in turn splits into smaller branches. These splits reflect\u00a0<a class=\"mw-redirect\" title=\"Evolutionary history\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Evolutionary_history\">evolutionary history<\/a>\u00a0as populations diverged and evolved independently. Clades are termed\u00a0<a title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Monophyly\">monophyletic<\/a>\u00a0(Greek: &#8220;one clan&#8221;) groups.\u00a0<em>[<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Clade\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Wikipedia<\/strong><\/a>]<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;ve been hearing about clades for decades, but don&#8217;t really know much about the concept. Noted in &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/mg24132140-200-human-or-hybrid-the-big-debate-over-what-a-species-really-is\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Human or hybrid? The big debate over what a species really is<\/em><\/a>,&#8221; (sheesh, ending a sentence with &#8220;is&#8221; seems ugly),\u00a0Colin Barras, <em><strong>NewScientist<\/strong><\/em> (26 January 2019, paywall)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Perhaps, instead, the ultimate solution is simply to remove the word \u201cspecies\u201d from the scientific lexicon. In 2018, [Brent] Mishler [at UCB] and John Wilkins at the University of Melbourne, Australia, set out this argument. They suggested that we should focus on another division of life, the \u201cclade\u201d, a group sharing a common ancestor and so comprising a separate twig on the tree of life. They say we could classify organisms as the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.3998\/ptpbio.16039257.0010.001\">Smallest Named and Registered Clade<\/a>, or SNaRC, rather than as species. So, for example, Neanderthals, Denisovans and living humans would be three distinct SNaRCs. There is nothing intrinsically special about SNaRCs, according to Mishler: they might interbreed or not, and the groups that fit the classification would vary across the tree of life, forcing us to accept that there is no common currency. By abandoning \u201cspecies\u201d and turning to \u201cSNaRCs\u201d, he argues, biologists would have a blank slate for thinking about biodiversity.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Which leads one to wonder, into just which <em>SNaRC<\/em> does a <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Snark_(Lewis_Carroll)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>snark<\/em><\/a> belong?<\/p>\n<p>And just because it caught me by surprise, in the same article is this:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In the past century, scientists have redefined what a species is time and again, heaping confusion upon confusion (see \u201cParsing nature\u201d). [Frank Zachos at the Natural History Museum Vienna, Austria] identifies no fewer than 32 competing definitions in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/gp\/book\/9783319449647\">his 2016 book on the subject<\/a>,\u00a0<i>Species Concepts in Biology<\/i>, and notes that two more have been added since then.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><em><strong>32?! <\/strong><\/em>No<em><strong>, 34!?\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>Sometimes Nature doesn&#8217;t cooperate with our categorization schemes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Clade: A\u00a0clade\u00a0(from\u00a0Ancient Greek:\u00a0\u03ba\u03bb\u03ac\u03b4\u03bf\u03c2,\u00a0klados, &#8220;branch&#8221;), also known as monophyletic group, is a group of\u00a0organisms\u00a0that consists of a\u00a0common ancestor\u00a0and all its\u00a0lineal descendants, and represents a single &#8220;branch&#8221; on the &#8220;tree of life&#8220;.[1] The common ancestor may be an individual, a\u00a0population, a\u00a0species (extinct\u00a0or\u00a0extant), and so on right up to a\u00a0kingdom\u00a0and further. Clades are \u2026 <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/2019\/02\/17\/word-of-the-day-452\/\"> Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr; <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24118","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24118","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24118"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24118\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24127,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24118\/revisions\/24127"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24118"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}