{"id":18905,"date":"2019-01-10T07:31:03","date_gmt":"2019-01-10T13:31:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/?p=18905"},"modified":"2019-01-10T07:31:03","modified_gmt":"2019-01-10T13:31:03","slug":"thinking-about-walls","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/2019\/01\/10\/thinking-about-walls\/","title":{"rendered":"Thinking About Walls"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In <em><strong>WaPo<\/strong><\/em> Marc Thiessen <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/trump-won-the-night-schumer-and-pelosi-lost\/2019\/01\/08\/890ce9d8-13bd-11e9-b6ad-9cfd62dbb0a8_story.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">makes the case<\/a> that President Trump&#8217;s address to the nation was a big win for the embattled President:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>And he laid out his solution, which he explained was \u201cdeveloped by law enforcement professionals and border agents\u201d and includes funds for cutting-edge technology, more border agents, more immigration judges, more bed space and medical support \u2014 and $5.7 billion for a \u201cphysical barrier\u201d that he called \u201cjust common sense.\u201d Without naming her, Trump responded to the absurd charge from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that a wall is \u201cimmoral.\u201d Democrats voted repeatedly for physical barriers until he was elected president, he noted. If a wall is immoral, Trump asked, \u201cwhy do wealthy politicians build walls, fences and gates around their homes? They don\u2019t build walls because they hate the people on the outside, but because they love the people on the inside.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Thiessen, of course, is well-known as a Trump apologist who has <a href=\"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/2018\/10\/18\/deep-intellectual-confusion\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">twisted himself inside out<\/a> on occasion to justify Trump&#8217;s record. Steve Benen&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.com\/rachel-maddow-show\/coming-terms-the-point-trumps-cynical-oval-office-address\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">reading<\/a> of the situation is hardly correlational with Thiessen&#8217;s:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>He probably won\u2019t admit it publicly, but Donald Trump reportedly didn\u2019t even want to deliver his Oval Office address last night.<\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0<em>New York Times\u00a0<\/em>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/01\/08\/us\/politics\/donald-trump-speech.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">reported<\/a>, \u201c[P]rivately, Mr. Trump dismissed his own new strategy as pointless. In an off-the-record lunch with television anchors hours before the address, he made clear in blunt terms that he was not inclined to give the speech or go to Texas, but was talked into it by advisers, according to two people briefed on the discussion who asked not to be identified sharing details.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The president, of course,\u00a0<a class=\" vilynx_listened\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/politics\/white-house\/trump-s-oval-office-address-shows-he-s-losing-border-n956526\" rel=\"nofollow\">delivered the speech<\/a>\u00a0anyway, and by any objective measure, it was a transparent failure. As became painfully obvious over the course of his nine minutes, Trump has no plan. He has no new material. He has no offer to extend to his rivals. He has no bill to promote or lobby on behalf of. He has\u00a0<a class=\" vilynx_listened\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/politics\/politics-news\/fact-check-trump-claims-southern-border-crisis-n956421\" rel=\"nofollow\">no facts<\/a>, as evidenced by the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/politics\/fact-checker\/fact-checking-president-trumps-oval-office-address-on-immigration\/2019\/01\/09\/0c42ac02-82df-4035-a69d-7a024175b399_story.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">avalanche<\/a>of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/01\/08\/us\/politics\/trump-speech.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">falsehoods<\/a>\u00a0he peddled to the nation. He has no support, with polls showing broad American opposition to his demands for a border wall.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Benen, too, reads the events of the day through his prism, and while I have more sympathy for his take on things &#8211; and in particular his reference to polls which document the lack of public support for Trump&#8217;s wall &#8211; it comes to mind that, in reality, it&#8217;s better to wait for polls to emerge indicating whether the citizenry was swayed, or not, by the President, by the Democratic response &#8211; or if they just didn&#8217;t give a shit. Either or both of these writers may hope to sway opinions.<\/p>\n<p>But while I was contemplating the various spins presented, it seems that after these two and more years, one fact about walls finally tapped me on the shoulder and asked me why I hadn&#8217;t mentioned it yet. It&#8217;s this:<\/p>\n<p>Do walls at zoos exist to keep visitors out? Or the animals in? How about prisons?<\/p>\n<p>Did the Berlin Wall exist to keep the Western hordes out?\u00a0Or to keep the citizens of Communist Germany <strong>IN<\/strong>? If my reader is too young to remember the Berlin Wall, go look up the statistics on how many people were killed by the Communist guards for attempting to go over the wall, and their identities.<\/p>\n<p>For those readers who prefer to interpret reality through the prism of fantasy, consider the purpose of the wall at the\u00a0Tower of Cirith Ungol.<\/p>\n<p>Now, I&#8217;m not really sure how this all applies to our particular situation. Perhaps it doesn&#8217;t. But in all the yelling and screaming from both sides, it&#8217;s worth remembering that walls can keep people <strong>in<\/strong> as well as <strong>out<\/strong>. And that&#8217;s an infringement on our freedom, now isn&#8217;t it?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In WaPo Marc Thiessen makes the case that President Trump&#8217;s address to the nation was a big win for the embattled President: And he laid out his solution, which he explained was \u201cdeveloped by law enforcement professionals and border agents\u201d and includes funds for cutting-edge technology, more border agents, more \u2026 <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/2019\/01\/10\/thinking-about-walls\/\"> Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr; <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18905","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18905"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18905\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18909,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18905\/revisions\/18909"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/huewhite.com\/umb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}